• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

局部氧疗治疗糖尿病足溃疡:一项多中心、开放、随机对照临床试验。

Topical oxygen therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a multicentre, open, randomised controlled clinical trial.

机构信息

SerenaGroup Inc., Cambridge, MA, US.

Royal Research Corp., Pembroke Pines, FL, US.

出版信息

J Wound Care. 2021 May 1;30(Sup5):S7-S14. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2021.30.Sup5.S7.

DOI:10.12968/jowc.2021.30.Sup5.S7
PMID:33979229
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Perfusion and blood oxygen levels are frequently insufficient in patients with hard-to-heal wounds due to poor circulation, vascular disruption and vasoconstriction, reducing the wound's capacity to heal. This study aimed to investigate the effect of topical oxygen on healing rates in patients with hard-to-heal diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) (i.e., non-responsive over four weeks).

METHOD

This multicentre, open-label, community-based randomised clinical trial compared standard care (SOC) with or without continuous topical oxygen therapy (TOT) for 12 weeks in patients with DFUs or minor amputation wounds. SOC included debridement, offloading with total contact casting (TCC) and appropriate moisture balance. Primary endpoints were the number of patients to achieve complete wound closure and percentage change in ulcer size. Secondary endpoints were pain levels and adverse events.

RESULTS

For the study, 145 patients were randomised with index ulcers graded Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) 1 or 2, or Wagner 1 or 2. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 18/64 (28.1%) patients healed in the SOC group at 12 weeks compared with 36/81 (44.4%) in the SOC plus TOT group (p=0.044). There was a statistically significant reduction in wound area between the groups: SOC group mean reduction: 40% (standard deviation (SD) 72.1); SOC plus TOT group mean reduction: 70% (SD 45.5); per protocol p=0.005). There were no significant differences in changes to pain levels or adverse events.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the addition of TOT to SOC facilitates wound closure in patients with hard-to-heal DFUs.

摘要

目的

由于血液循环不良、血管破裂和血管收缩,导致难以愈合的伤口的灌注和血氧水平经常不足,从而降低了伤口的愈合能力。本研究旨在探讨局部氧疗对治疗难以愈合的糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)(即 4 周以上无反应)患者的愈合率的影响。

方法

这项多中心、开放性、社区为基础的随机临床试验比较了标准治疗(SOC)加或不加持续局部氧疗(TOT)12 周对 DFU 或小截肢伤口患者的治疗效果。SOC 包括清创、全接触加压包扎(TCC)和适当的水分平衡。主要终点是达到完全伤口闭合的患者数量和溃疡大小的百分比变化。次要终点是疼痛水平和不良事件。

结果

在这项研究中,145 名患者被随机分为指数溃疡分级美国传染病学会(IDSA)1 级或 2 级,或 Wagner 1 级或 2 级。在意向治疗分析中,SOC 组在 12 周时有 18/64(28.1%)名患者愈合,SOC 加 TOT 组有 36/81(44.4%)名患者愈合(p=0.044)。两组之间的伤口面积有统计学显著的减少:SOC 组平均减少 40%(标准差 72.1);SOC 加 TOT 组平均减少 70%(标准差 45.5);按方案分析,p=0.005)。疼痛水平或不良事件的变化无显著差异。

结论

本研究表明,SOC 加 TOT 有助于治疗难以愈合的 DFU 患者的伤口闭合。

相似文献

1
Topical oxygen therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a multicentre, open, randomised controlled clinical trial.局部氧疗治疗糖尿病足溃疡:一项多中心、开放、随机对照临床试验。
J Wound Care. 2021 May 1;30(Sup5):S7-S14. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2021.30.Sup5.S7.
2
Efficacy and safety of autologous whole blood clot in diabetic foot ulcers: a randomised controlled trial.自体全血凝块治疗糖尿病足溃疡的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验。
J Wound Care. 2024 Sep 2;33(9):688-700. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2024.0195. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
3
A prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre clinical trial examining healing rates, safety and cost to closure of an acellular reticular allogenic human dermis versus standard of care in the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers.一项前瞻性、随机、对照、多中心临床试验,旨在研究脱细胞异体人真皮网状层与标准治疗方法相比,在治疗慢性糖尿病足溃疡时的愈合率、安全性及愈合成本。
Int Wound J. 2017 Apr;14(2):307-315. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12600. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
4
A multicenter clinical trial evaluating the durability of diabetic foot ulcer healing in ulcers treated with topical oxygen and standard of care versus standard of care alone 1 year post healing.一项多中心临床试验评估了在治疗糖尿病足溃疡时,局部氧气治疗和标准治疗与单纯标准治疗相比在 1 年愈合后的耐用性。
Int Wound J. 2022 Nov;19(7):1838-1842. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13789. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
5
Poorly designed research does not help clarify the role of hyperbaric oxygen in the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers.设计不佳的研究无助于阐明高压氧在慢性糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的作用。
Diving Hyperb Med. 2016 Sep;46(3):133-134.
6
A Multinational, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Cyclical Topical Wound Oxygen (TWO2) Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcers: The TWO2 Study.多国多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究,评估周期性局部创面氧疗(TWO2)治疗慢性糖尿病足溃疡的疗效:TWO2 研究。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Mar;43(3):616-624. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0476. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
7
Efficacy of autologous platelet-rich plasma gel in patients with hard-to-heal diabetic foot ulcers: a multicentre study in Japan.富血小板血浆凝胶治疗难愈合糖尿病足溃疡的疗效:日本多中心研究。
J Wound Care. 2024 Jul 2;33(7):484-494. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2023.0088.
8
Management of hard-to-heal leg ulcers with an acid-oxidising solution versus standard of care: the MACAN study.使用酸化氧化溶液治疗难治性腿部溃疡与常规护理的对比:MACAN 研究。
J Wound Care. 2021 Sep 2;30(9):694-704. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2021.30.9.694.
9
Dehydrated Amnion Chorion Membrane versus standard of care for diabetic foot ulcers: a randomised controlled trial.脱水羊膜绒毛膜与糖尿病足溃疡的标准治疗比较:一项随机对照试验。
J Wound Care. 2024 Jul 1;33(Sup7):S4-S14. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2024.0139. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
10
Systematic reviews of wound care management: (3) antimicrobial agents for chronic wounds; (4) diabetic foot ulceration.伤口护理管理的系统评价:(3)慢性伤口的抗菌剂;(4)糖尿病足溃疡。
Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(21):1-237.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the efficacy of 12 interventions in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a network meta-analysis.12种干预措施治疗糖尿病足溃疡的疗效比较:一项网状Meta分析
PeerJ. 2025 Aug 11;13:e19809. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19809. eCollection 2025.
2
Use of Continuous Topical Oxygen Therapy to Treat Lower-Extremity Surgical Wound Dehiscence: A Retrospective Review.使用持续局部氧疗治疗下肢手术伤口裂开:一项回顾性研究。
Eplasty. 2025 Jul 1;25:e23. eCollection 2025.
3
Comparative efficacy of gas therapy for diabetic foot ulcers using network meta-analysis.
使用网状Meta分析比较气体疗法治疗糖尿病足溃疡的疗效
PeerJ. 2025 Jun 16;13:e19571. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19571. eCollection 2025.
4
Use of Continuous Topical Oxygen Therapy in Combination to Optimize the Chronic Wound Environment Prior to Cellular, Acellular, and Matrix-Like Product Application: A Retrospective Case Series.在应用细胞、无细胞和类基质产品之前,联合使用持续局部氧疗以优化慢性伤口环境:一项回顾性病例系列研究
Eplasty. 2024 Dec 6;24:e64. eCollection 2024.
5
[A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in treating chronic wound pain in patients].[非药物干预治疗慢性伤口疼痛患者有效性的系统评价与贝叶斯网络Meta分析]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2025 May 20;41(5):491-500. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20241213-00486.
6
Biodegradable Oxygen-Generating Microneedle Patches for Regenerative Medicine Applications.用于再生医学应用的可生物降解产氧微针贴片
Adv Nanobiomed Res. 2025 Jan;5(1):2400093. doi: 10.1002/anbr.202400093. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
7
Systematic review of the effects of topical oxygen therapy on wound healing.局部氧疗对伤口愈合影响的系统评价
JVS Vasc Insights. 2024;2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsvi.2023.100051. Epub 2023 Dec 30.
8
An Overview of Recent Clinical Trials for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Therapies.糖尿病足溃疡治疗近期临床试验概述
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 16;13(24):7655. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247655.
9
12. Retinopathy, Neuropathy, and Foot Care: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.12. 视网膜病变、神经病变与足部护理:2025年糖尿病护理标准
Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan 1;48(Supplement_1):S252-S265. doi: 10.2337/dc25-S012.
10
Harnessing Oil for Enhanced Skin Wound Healing: The Role of Reactive Oxygen Species Regulation.利用油脂促进皮肤伤口愈合:活性氧调节的作用
Pharmaceutics. 2024 Sep 30;16(10):1277. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16101277.