• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考察 COMLEX-USA 水平 2-认知评估与 COMLEX-USA 水平 2-表现评估之间的同时效度。

Examining concurrent validity between COMLEX-USA Level 2-Cognitive Evaluation and COMLEX-USA Level 2-Performance Evaluation.

机构信息

National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners, Chicago, IL, USA.

National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Osteopath Med. 2021 May 13;121(8):687-691. doi: 10.1515/jom-2021-0007.

DOI:10.1515/jom-2021-0007
PMID:33979903
Abstract

CONTEXT

The Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination of the United States of America (COMLEX-USA) is a three level examination used as a pathway to licensure for students in osteopathic medical education programs. COMLEX-USA Level 2 includes a written assessment of Fundamental Clinical Sciences for Osteopathic Medical Practice (Level 2-Cognitive Evaluation [L2-CE]) delivered in a computer based format and separate performance evaluation (Level 2-Performance Evaluation [L2-PE]) administered through live encounters with standardized patients. L2-PE was designed to augment L2-CE. It is expected that the two examinations measure related yet distinct constructs.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the concurrent validity of L2-CE with L2-PE.

METHODS

First attempt test scores were obtained from the National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners database for 6,639 candidates who took L2-CE between June 2019 and May 2020 and matched to the students' L2-PE scores. The sample represented all colleges of osteopathic medicine and 97.5% of candidates who took L2-CE during the complete 2019-2020 test cycle. We calculated disattenuated correlations between the total score for L2-CE, the L2-CE scores for the seven competency domains (CD1 through CD7), and the L2-PE scores for the Humanistic Domain (HM) and Biomedical/Biomechanical Domain (BM). All scores were on continuous scales.

RESULTS

Pearson correlations ranged from 0.10 to 0.88 and were all statically significant (p<0.01). L2-CE total score was most strongly correlated with CD2 (0.88) and CD3 (0.85). Pearson correlations between the L2-CE competency domain subscores ranged from 0.17 to 0.70, and correlations which included either HM or BM ranged from 0.10 to 0.34 with the strongest of those correlations being between BM and L2-CE total score (0.34) as well as between HM and BM (0.28).The largest increase between corresponding Pearson and disattenuated correlations was for pairs of scores with lower reliabilities such as CD5 and CD6, which had a Pearson correlation of 0.17 and a disattenuated correlation of 0.68. The smallest increase in correlations was observed in pairs of scores with larger reliabilities such as L2-CE total score and HM, which had a Pearson correlation of 0.23 and a disattenuated correlation of 0.28. The reliability of L2-CE was 0.87, 0.81 for HM, and 0.73 for BM. The reliabilities for the L2-CE competency domain scores ranged from 0.22 to 0.74. The small to moderate correlations between the L2-CE total score and the two L2-PE support the expectation that these examinations measure related but distinct constructs. The correlations between L2-PE and L2-CE competency domain subscores reflect the distribution of items defined by the L2-PE blueprint, providing evidence that the examinations are performing as designed.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence supporting the validity of the blueprints for constructing COMLEX-USA Levels 2-CE and 2-PE examinations in concert with the purpose and nature of the examinations.

摘要

背景

美国整骨医学许可考试(COMLEX-USA)是一种三级考试,是骨医学教育项目学生获得行医执照的途径之一。COMLEX-USA 第 2 级包括基础临床科学的书面评估,用于骨医学实践(第 2 级认知评估[L2-CE]),以计算机为基础的格式提供,以及通过与标准化患者进行现场接触进行的单独绩效评估(第 2 级绩效评估[L2-PE])。L2-PE 的设计目的是增强 L2-CE。预计这两项考试将测量相关但不同的结构。

目的

探讨 L2-CE 与 L2-PE 的并行效度。

方法

从全国骨医学考试委员会数据库中获得了 6639 名考生的首次尝试考试成绩,这些考生于 2019 年 6 月至 2020 年 5 月参加了 L2-CE,并与学生的 L2-PE 分数相匹配。该样本代表了所有的骨医学院和 97.5%的在整个 2019-2020 考试周期中参加 L2-CE 的考生。我们计算了 L2-CE 总分、七个能力领域(CD1 至 CD7)的 L2-CE 分数与人文领域(HM)和生物医学/生物力学领域(BM)的 L2-PE 分数之间的去衰减相关系数。所有分数均为连续尺度。

结果

皮尔逊相关系数范围为 0.10 至 0.88,均具有统计学意义(p<0.01)。L2-CE 总分与 CD2(0.88)和 CD3(0.85)相关性最强。L2-CE 能力领域分项分数之间的皮尔逊相关系数范围为 0.17 至 0.70,包括 HM 或 BM 的相关系数范围为 0.10 至 0.34,其中最强的相关性是 BM 与 L2-CE 总分(0.34)以及 HM 与 BM(0.28)之间的相关性。相应的皮尔逊和去衰减相关系数之间最大的增加是对应分数可靠性较低的情况,例如 CD5 和 CD6,它们的皮尔逊相关系数为 0.17,去衰减相关系数为 0.68。相关性的增加最小的情况是分数可靠性较大的情况,例如 L2-CE 总分和 HM,它们的皮尔逊相关系数为 0.23,去衰减相关系数为 0.28。L2-CE 的可靠性为 0.87,HM 的可靠性为 0.81,BM 的可靠性为 0.73。L2-CE 能力领域分数的可靠性范围为 0.22 至 0.74。L2-CE 总分与两个 L2-PE 之间的小到中度相关性支持这样一种期望,即这些考试测量相关但不同的结构。L2-PE 与 L2-CE 能力领域分项分数之间的相关性反映了 L2-PE 蓝图定义的项目分布,这为考试按设计进行提供了证据。

结论

本研究为 COMLEX-USA 第 2 级 CE 和 2 级 PE 考试蓝图的构建提供了支持,与考试的目的和性质一致。

相似文献

1
Examining concurrent validity between COMLEX-USA Level 2-Cognitive Evaluation and COMLEX-USA Level 2-Performance Evaluation.考察 COMLEX-USA 水平 2-认知评估与 COMLEX-USA 水平 2-表现评估之间的同时效度。
J Osteopath Med. 2021 May 13;121(8):687-691. doi: 10.1515/jom-2021-0007.
2
A validity study of COMLEX-USA Level 3 with the new test design.采用新测试设计对美国执业医师综合执照考试第3级进行的效度研究。
J Osteopath Med. 2024 Mar 19;124(6):257-265. doi: 10.1515/jom-2023-0011. eCollection 2024 Jun 1.
3
Prediction of Osteopathic Medical School Performance on the basis of MCAT score, GPA, sex, undergraduate major, and undergraduate institution.基于医学院入学考试(MCAT)成绩、平均绩点(GPA)、性别、本科专业和本科院校对整骨医学院表现的预测。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2012 Apr;112(4):175-81.
4
The Predictive Validity of the National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners' COMLEX-USA Examinations With Regard to Outcomes on American Board of Family Medicine Examinations.美国骨科医师协会(National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners)的美国骨科医师执照考试(COMLEX-USA)对于美国家庭医学委员会(American Board of Family Medicine)考试结果的预测效度。
Acad Med. 2016 Nov;91(11):1568-1575. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001254.
5
Relationship of Clinical Skills Performance in Medical School With COMLEX-USA Level 2-Performance Evaluation.医学院临床技能表现与 COMLEX-USA 水平 2 表现评估的关系。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2020 Apr 1;120(4):245-252. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2020.041.
6
Relationship between COMLEX-USA scores and performance on the American Osteopathic Board of Emergency Medicine Part I certifying examination.美国骨病医学会综合骨科医学执照考试(COMLEX - USA)成绩与美国急诊医学骨病医学委员会第一部分认证考试表现之间的关系。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2014 Apr;114(4):260-6. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2014.051.
7
Relationships between the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Achievement Test (COMAT) subject examinations and the COMLEX-USA Level 2-Cognitive Evaluation.综合整骨医学成就测试(COMAT)科目考试与美国骨科学术水平考试-2认知评估(COMLEX-USA Level 2-Cognitive Evaluation)之间的关系。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2014 Sep;114(9):714-21. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2014.140.
8
Preparation Strategies of Osteopathic Medical Students for the COMLEX-USA Level 2-PE.美国骨病医学院学生针对美国骨病医学执照考试第二部分——实践考试(COMLEX-USA Level 2-PE)的备考策略
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2016 Apr;116(4):234-42. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2016.048.
9
Predictive relationship of osteopathic manual medicine grades and COMLEX-USA Level 1 total scores and osteopathic principles and practice subscores.整骨手法医学成绩与美国综合骨科医学执照考试一级总分及整骨疗法原理与实践子分数之间的预测关系。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2014 Jun;114(6):480-5. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2014.097.
10
Association Between Undergraduate Performance Predictors and Academic and Clinical Performance of Osteopathic Medical Students.本科成绩预测指标与整骨医学生学业及临床成绩之间的关联
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2018 Feb 1;118(2):106-114. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2018.025.

引用本文的文献

1
Conducting an objective structured clinical examination under COVID-restricted conditions.在 COVID 限制条件下进行客观结构化临床考试。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jul 25;24(1):801. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05774-8.