Newton J T, Sturmey P
Plymouth Polytechnic, Devon, England.
J Ment Defic Res. 1988 Apr;32 ( Pt 2):87-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1988.tb01394.x.
The Aberrant Behaviour Checklist was administered to 209 British mentally handicapped adults in two large residential facilities. This sample included a substantial proportion (45%) of non-ambulant people not included in previous studies. The five-factor solution originally reported by Aman et al. (1985a) was replicated using both four-point ratings and dichotomously recoded rating. For both methods of scoring, the five scales derived from Aman et al.'s original factor analysis remained highly internally consistent. Dichotomously coded ratings may offer the advantage over four-point ratings of retaining the same factor structure with better reliability.
对两家大型寄宿机构中的209名英国成年智障人士进行了异常行为检查表评估。该样本包括很大比例(45%)的非行走能力者,这部分人群未被纳入以往研究。使用四点评分法和二分法重新编码评分法,重复了阿曼等人(1985a)最初报告的五因素解决方案。对于两种评分方法,从阿曼等人最初的因素分析中得出的五个量表在内部仍然高度一致。二分法编码评分可能比四点评分具有优势,即能以更好的可靠性保持相同的因素结构。