Kennedy Krieger Institute and Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, United States.
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Apr;34(4):1190-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.01.002. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
Severe problem behaviors such as self-injury and aggression are frequently observed in young children under age 5 with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). Although early identification of problem behavior is critical to effective intervention, there are few standardized measures available that identify severe problem behavior in this population. The Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community (ABC-C; Aman & Singh, 1994) is a rating scale that measures the severity of a range of problem behaviors commonly observed in individuals with IDD. While it has been used with children under 5, investigations into the fit of the ABC-C for this population are sparse. The purpose of the present study was to report on ABC-C scores in a sample of 97 children under age 5 with problem behavior. Analyses included evaluating differences in scores between age groups, comparing sample norms to established norms for older children, and conducting a confirmatory factor analysis. Results indicated differences in mean scores based on age with younger children generally scoring higher on some subscales of the ABC-C. Furthermore, the original 5-factor structure of the ABC-C was not fully supported. In general, the ABC-C may over- or underestimate behavior problems in younger children; therefore more extensive investigation into the utility of the ABC-C for children under age 5 is warranted.
严重的问题行为,如自伤和攻击行为,在 5 岁以下有智力和发育障碍(ID)的幼儿中经常观察到。尽管早期识别问题行为对于有效干预至关重要,但目前可用的标准化措施很少能够识别出该人群中的严重问题行为。异常行为检查表-社区版(ABC-C;Aman 和 Singh,1994)是一种评定量表,用于测量在 ID 人群中常见的一系列问题行为的严重程度。虽然它已被用于 5 岁以下的儿童,但针对该人群的 ABC-C 适用性的研究很少。本研究的目的是报告在一个有问题行为的 97 名 5 岁以下儿童样本中的 ABC-C 得分。分析包括评估年龄组之间的得分差异,将样本规范与为年龄较大的儿童制定的规范进行比较,并进行验证性因素分析。结果表明,基于年龄的平均得分存在差异,年龄较小的儿童在 ABC-C 的某些分量表上的得分通常较高。此外,ABC-C 的原始 5 因素结构没有得到充分支持。总的来说,ABC-C 可能会高估或低估年龄较小的儿童的行为问题;因此,需要更广泛地研究 ABC-C 在 5 岁以下儿童中的应用。