Suppr超能文献

拉丁美洲和加勒比地区糖尿病周围神经病变的患病率和发病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Prevalence and incidence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in Latin America and the Caribbean: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Grupo de Investigación Neurociencia, Efectividad y Salud Pública, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Perú.

Red de Eficacia Clínica y Sanitaria, REDECS, Lima, Perú.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 May 13;16(5):e0251642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251642. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

AIMS

The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to estimate the prevalence and incidence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE and LILACS databases of published observational studies in LAC up to December 2020. Meta-analyses of proportions were performed using random-effects models using Stata Program 15.1. Heterogeneity was evaluated through sensitivity, subgroup, and meta-regression analyses. Evidence certainty was performed with the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies from eight countries were included. The estimated prevalence of DPN was 46.5% (95%CI: 38.0-55.0) with a significant heterogeneity (I2 = 98.2%; p<0.01). Only two studies reported incidence, and the pooled effect size was 13.7% (95%CI: 10.6-17.2). We found an increasing trend of cumulative DPN prevalence over time. The main sources of heterogeneity associated with higher prevalence were diagnosis criteria, higher A1c (%), and inadequate sample size. We judge the included evidence as very low certainty.

CONCLUSION

The overall prevalence of DPN is high in LAC with significant heterogeneity between and within countries that could be explained by population type and methodological aspects. Significant gaps (e.g., under-representation of most countries, lack of incidence studies, and heterogenous case definition) were identified. Standardized and population-based studies of DPN in LAC are needed.

摘要

目的

本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是估计拉丁美洲和加勒比地区(LAC)糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)的患病率和发病率。

材料和方法

我们检索了 LAC 发表的观察性研究的 MEDLINE、SCOPUS、Web of Science、EMBASE 和 LILACS 数据库,截至 2020 年 12 月。使用 Stata Program 15.1 采用随机效应模型进行比例的荟萃分析。通过敏感性、亚组和荟萃回归分析评估异质性。使用 GRADE 方法评估证据确定性。

结果

纳入了来自 8 个国家的 29 项研究。DPN 的估计患病率为 46.5%(95%CI:38.0-55.0),存在显著异质性(I2 = 98.2%;p<0.01)。只有两项研究报告了发病率,汇总效应量为 13.7%(95%CI:10.6-17.2)。我们发现随着时间的推移,累积 DPN 患病率呈上升趋势。与更高患病率相关的主要异质性来源是诊断标准、更高的 A1c(%)和样本量不足。我们认为纳入的证据确定性非常低。

结论

LAC 中 DPN 的总体患病率较高,且各国之间和各国内部存在显著异质性,这可能与人群类型和方法学方面有关。确定了重大差距(例如,大多数国家代表性不足、缺乏发病率研究以及异质的病例定义)。需要在 LAC 进行标准化和基于人群的 DPN 研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a25/8118539/f08ad04873fb/pone.0251642.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验