• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于监测 COVID-19 大流行期间发病率、死亡率和病死率随时间变化的地理差异的不平等指数。

Inequality indices to monitor geographic differences in incidence, mortality and fatality rates over time during the COVID-19 pandemic.

机构信息

Institute of Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 May 13;16(5):e0251366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251366. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0251366
PMID:33984055
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8118350/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is of interest to explore the variability in how the COVID-19 pandemic evolved geographically during the first twelve months. To this end, we apply inequality indices over regions to incidences, infection related mortality, and infection fatality rates. If avoiding of inequality in health is an important political goal, a metric must be implemented to track geographical inequality over time.

METHODS

The relative and absolute Gini index as well as the Theil index are used to quantify inequality. Data are taken from international data bases. Absolute counts are transformed to rates adjusted for population size.

RESULTS

Comparing continents, the absolute Gini index shows an unfavorable development in four continents since February 2020. In contrast, the relative Gini as well as the Theil index support the interpretation of less inequality between European countries compared to other continents. Infection fatality rates within the EU as well as within the U.S. express comparable improvement towards more equality (as measured by both Gini indices).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of inequality indices to monitor changes in geographic inequality over time for key health indicators is a valuable tool to inform public health policies. The absolute and relative Gini index behave complementary and should be reported simultaneously in order to gain a meta-perspective on very complex dynamics.

摘要

背景

探索 COVID-19 大流行在最初 12 个月期间在地理上的变化方式很有意义。为此,我们在各地区应用不平等指数来评估发病率、与感染相关的死亡率和感染病死率。如果避免健康方面的不平等是一个重要的政治目标,那么必须实施一种指标来跟踪随时间推移的地理不平等。

方法

使用相对基尼系数和绝对基尼系数以及 Theil 指数来量化不平等。数据取自国际数据库。绝对计数转换为按人口规模调整后的比率。

结果

从大陆层面比较,自 2020 年 2 月以来,四个大陆的绝对基尼系数显示出不利的发展。相比之下,相对基尼系数和 Theil 指数支持这样的解释,即与其他大陆相比,欧洲国家之间的不平等程度较低。欧盟和美国内部的感染病死率都朝着更加平等(用基尼系数衡量)的方向表达了类似的改善。

结论

使用不平等指数来监测关键健康指标的地理不平等随时间的变化是为公共卫生政策提供信息的一个有价值的工具。绝对基尼系数和相对基尼系数具有互补性,应同时报告,以便从更复杂的动态中获得元视角。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b05/8118350/aadf84c6cc5f/pone.0251366.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b05/8118350/b5fb53b83955/pone.0251366.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b05/8118350/33176d6c7245/pone.0251366.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b05/8118350/9e71a97e47a8/pone.0251366.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b05/8118350/46709cf74a75/pone.0251366.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b05/8118350/aadf84c6cc5f/pone.0251366.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b05/8118350/b5fb53b83955/pone.0251366.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b05/8118350/33176d6c7245/pone.0251366.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b05/8118350/9e71a97e47a8/pone.0251366.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b05/8118350/46709cf74a75/pone.0251366.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b05/8118350/aadf84c6cc5f/pone.0251366.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Inequality indices to monitor geographic differences in incidence, mortality and fatality rates over time during the COVID-19 pandemic.用于监测 COVID-19 大流行期间发病率、死亡率和病死率随时间变化的地理差异的不平等指数。
PLoS One. 2021 May 13;16(5):e0251366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251366. eCollection 2021.
2
Association Between Income Inequality and County-Level COVID-19 Cases and Deaths in the US.美国收入不平等与县一级新冠病例和死亡的关联
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e218799. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8799.
3
Association of Social and Economic Inequality With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Incidence and Mortality Across US Counties.社会经济不平等与美国各县 2019 冠状病毒病发病率和死亡率的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2034578. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.34578.
4
Geographic health inequalities in Norway: a Gini analysis of cross-county differences in mortality from 1980 to 2014.挪威的地理健康不平等:1980 年至 2014 年县际死亡率差异的基尼分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 May 24;17(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0771-7.
5
Income inequality and risk of infection and death by COVID-19 in Brazil.巴西的收入不平等与新冠病毒感染及死亡风险
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2020 Oct 5;23:e200095. doi: 10.1590/1980-549720200095. eCollection 2020.
6
The Gini coefficient as a useful measure of malaria inequality among populations.基尼系数作为衡量人群中疟疾不平等的有用指标。
Malar J. 2020 Dec 2;19(1):444. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03489-x.
7
Unequal burdens of COVID-19 infection: a nationwide cohort study of COVID-19-related health inequalities in Korea.COVID-19 感染的不平等负担:韩国 COVID-19 相关健康不平等的全国队列研究。
Epidemiol Health. 2023;45:e2023068. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2023068. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
8
Influencing factors of health resource allocation and utilisation before and after COVID-19 based on RIF-I-OLS decomposition method: a longitudinal retrospective study in Guangdong Province, China.基于 RIF-I-OLS 分解方法的 COVID-19 前后卫生资源配置利用影响因素的纵向回顾性研究:中国广东省的一项研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 23;13(3):e065204. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065204.
9
Multilevel modeling of county-level excessive alcohol use, rurality, and COVID-19 case fatality rates in the US.对美国县级过度饮酒、农村地区和 COVID-19 病死率的多层次建模。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 17;16(6):e0253466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253466. eCollection 2021.
10
A County-Level Analysis of Socioeconomic and Clinical Predictors of COVID-19 Incidence and Case-Fatality Rates in Georgia, March-September 2020.2020 年 3 月至 9 月佐治亚州县级层面的 COVID-19 发病率和病死率的社会经济和临床预测因子分析。
Public Health Rep. 2021 Sep-Oct;136(5):626-635. doi: 10.1177/00333549211023267. Epub 2021 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantifying the Regional Disproportionality of COVID-19 Spread: Modeling Study.量化新冠病毒传播的区域不均衡性:建模研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 3;9:e59230. doi: 10.2196/59230.
2
Spatial-temporal distribution of incidence, mortality, and case-fatality ratios of coronavirus disease 2019 and its social determinants in Brazilian municipalities.2019 年冠状病毒病的发病率、死亡率和病死率的时空分布及其在巴西各城市的社会决定因素。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 13;13(1):4139. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31046-4.
3
Inequities in ambulance allocation associated with transfer delay and mortality in acute coronary syndrome patients: evidence from 89 emergency medical stations in China.

本文引用的文献

1
Behavioral dynamics of COVID-19: estimating underreporting, multiple waves, and adherence fatigue across 92 nations.新冠疫情的行为动态:评估92个国家的漏报情况、多波疫情及依从性疲劳
Syst Dyn Rev. 2021 Jan-Mar;37(1):5-31. doi: 10.1002/sdr.1673. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
2
Case Numbers Beyond Contact Tracing Capacity Are Endangering the Containment of COVID-19.超出接触者追踪能力的病例数正危及新冠疫情的控制。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020 Nov 13;117(46):790-791. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0790.
3
The Gini coefficient as a useful measure of malaria inequality among populations.
中国 89 个急救医疗站的研究表明,与急性冠状动脉综合征患者的转院延迟和死亡率相关的救护车分配不均。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Dec 16;21(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01777-3.
基尼系数作为衡量人群中疟疾不平等的有用指标。
Malar J. 2020 Dec 2;19(1):444. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03489-x.
4
Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY.使用 OpenSAFELY 分析与 COVID-19 相关死亡的因素。
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7821):430-436. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
5
Health equity and COVID-19: global perspectives.卫生公平与 COVID-19:全球视角。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Jun 26;19(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01218-z.
6
Does asymmetry in patient recruitment in large critical care trials follow the Pareto principle?大型重症监护试验中患者招募的不均衡是否遵循帕累托原则?
Trials. 2020 May 5;21(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04279-1.
7
Real estimates of mortality following COVID-19 infection.新冠病毒感染后死亡率的实际估计值。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;20(7):773. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30195-X. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
8
Gini coefficients for measuring the distribution of sexually transmitted infections among individuals with different levels of sexual activity.用于衡量不同性活动水平个体中性传播感染分布情况的基尼系数。
PeerJ. 2020 Jan 20;8:e8434. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8434. eCollection 2020.
9
Identification of the Differential Effect of City-Level on the Gini Coefficient of Health Service Delivery in Online Health Community.识别城市层面在在线健康社区卫生服务提供基尼系数上的差异效应。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 29;16(13):2314. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132314.
10
Availability and inequality in accessibility of health centre-based primary healthcare in Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚以卫生中心为基础的初级卫生保健的可及性和公平性。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 29;14(3):e0213896. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213896. eCollection 2019.