Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, USA.
Department of Psychology, Yale University, USA.
Cortex. 2021 Jul;140:128-144. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.02.032. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
Ecological stress during adolescent development may increase the sensitivity to negative emotional processes that can contribute to the onset and progression of internalizing behaviors during preadolescence. Although a small number of studies have considered the link among the relations between ecological stress, amygdala reactivity, and internalizing symptoms in childhood and adolescence, these studies have largely been small, cross-sectional, and often do not consider unique roles of parenting or sex. In the current study, we evaluated the interrelations between ecological stress, amygdala reactivity, subsequent internalizing symptoms, and the moderating roles of parenting and sex among 9- and 10-year-old preadolescents from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study ®. A subset of participants who met a priori quality control criteria for bilateral amygdala activation during the EN-back faces versus places contrast (N = 7,385; Mean Age = 120 months, SD = 7.52; 49.5% Female) were included in the study. A confirmatory factor analysis was performed to create a latent variable of ecological stress, and multiple structural equation models were tested to evaluate the association among baseline ecological stress and internalizing symptoms one year later, the mediating role of amygdala reactivity, and moderating effects of parental acceptance and sex. The results revealed a significant association between ecological stress and subsequent internalizing symptoms, which was greater in males than females. There was no association between amygdala reactivity during the Faces versus Places contrast and ecological stress or subsequent internalizing symptoms, and no mediating role of amygdala or moderating effect of parental acceptance on the association between ecological stress and internalizing symptoms. An alternative mediation model was tested which revealed that there was a small mediating effect of parental acceptance on the association between ecological stress and internalizing symptoms, demonstrating lower internalizing symptoms among preadolescents one year later. Given the lack of association in brain function, ecological stress and internalizing symptoms in preadolescents in this registered report, effects from comparable small studies should be reconsidered in larger samples.
青少年发育过程中的生态压力可能会增加对负面情绪过程的敏感性,从而导致青春期前内化行为的发生和发展。尽管少数研究考虑了生态压力、杏仁核反应性与儿童和青少年时期内化症状之间的关系,但这些研究规模较小、横断面研究居多,且往往不考虑育儿或性别的独特作用。在目前的研究中,我们评估了生态压力、杏仁核反应性、随后的内化症状之间的相互关系,以及育儿和性别的调节作用,研究对象为来自青少年大脑认知发展(ABCD)研究 ® 的 9-10 岁前青春期儿童。符合双侧杏仁核激活的事先质量控制标准的参与者子集(N=7385;平均年龄=120 个月,标准差=7.52;49.5%为女性)被纳入研究。进行了验证性因子分析以创建生态压力的潜在变量,并测试了多个结构方程模型,以评估基线生态压力与一年后内化症状之间的关联、杏仁核反应性的中介作用以及父母接纳和性别的调节作用。结果表明,生态压力与随后的内化症状之间存在显著关联,且在男性中比女性中更为明显。在 Faces 与 Places 对比期间,杏仁核反应性与生态压力或随后的内化症状之间没有关联,杏仁核或父母接纳的调节作用也没有对生态压力与内化症状之间的关联产生影响。测试了一种替代的中介模型,结果表明父母接纳对生态压力与内化症状之间的关联具有较小的中介作用,表明一年后前青春期儿童的内化症状较低。鉴于本注册报告中前青春期儿童的大脑功能、生态压力和内化症状之间缺乏关联,应该在更大的样本中重新考虑来自可比小研究的效果。