Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Departments of Medicine and Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart and Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/dlbhattmd.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 May 18;77(19):2366-2377. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.03.298.
THEMIS (The Effect of Ticagrelor on Health Outcomes in Diabetes Mellitus Patients Intervention Study) (n = 19,220) and its pre-specified THEMIS-PCI (The Effect of Ticagrelor on Health Outcomes in Diabetes Mellitus Patients Intervention Study-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) (n = 11,154) subanalysis showed, in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (median duration 10.0 years; HbA 7.1%) and stable coronary artery disease without prior myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke, that ticagrelor plus aspirin (compared with placebo plus aspirin) produced a favorable net clinical benefit (composite of all-cause mortality, MI, stroke, fatal bleeding, and intracranial bleeding) if the patients had a previous percutaneous coronary intervention.
In these post hoc analyses, the authors examined whether the primary efficacy outcome (cardiovascular death, MI, stroke: 3-point major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE]), primary safety outcome (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction-defined major bleeding) and net clinical benefit varied with diabetes-related factors.
Outcomes were analyzed across baseline diabetes duration, HbA, and antihyperglycemic medications.
In THEMIS, the incidence of 3-point MACE increased with diabetes duration (6.7% for ≤5 years, 11.1% for >20 years) and HbA (6.4% for ≤6.0%, 11.8% for >10.0%). The relative benefits of ticagrelor plus aspirin on 3-point MACE reduction (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.90; p = 0.04) were generally consistent across subgroups. Major bleeding event rate (overall: 1.6%) did not vary by diabetes duration or HbA and was increased similarly by ticagrelor across all subgroups (HR: 2.32; p < 0.001). These findings were mirrored in THEMIS-PCI. The efficacy and safety of ticagrelor plus aspirin did not differ by baseline antihyperglycemic therapy. In THEMIS-PCI, but not THEMIS, ticagrelor generally produced favorable net clinical benefit across diabetes duration, HbA, and antihyperglycemic medications.
Ticagrelor plus aspirin yielded generally consistent and favorable net clinical benefit across the diabetes-related factors in THEMIS-PCI but not in the overall THEMIS population.
THEMIS(替格瑞洛对糖尿病患者健康结局的影响研究)(n=19220)及其预先指定的 THEMIS-PCI(替格瑞洛对糖尿病患者健康结局的影响研究-经皮冠状动脉介入治疗)(n=11154)亚分析表明,在患有 2 型糖尿病(中位数病程 10.0 年;HbA7.1%)和稳定型冠状动脉疾病且无既往心肌梗死(MI)或卒中的患者中,如果患者曾接受过经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,替格瑞洛加阿司匹林(与安慰剂加阿司匹林相比)产生了有利的净临床获益(全因死亡率、MI、卒中和致命性出血、颅内出血的复合终点)。
在这些事后分析中,作者检查了主要疗效结局(心血管死亡、MI、卒中等 3 点主要不良心血管事件[MACE])、主要安全性结局(溶栓治疗后 MI 定义的大出血)和净临床获益是否因糖尿病相关因素而不同。
根据基线时糖尿病病程、HbA 和抗高血糖药物对结局进行分析。
在 THEMIS 中,3 点 MACE 的发生率随糖尿病病程(5 年以下为 6.7%,20 年以上为 11.1%)和 HbA(6.0%以下为 6.4%,10.0%以上为 11.8%)而增加。替格瑞洛加阿司匹林对 3 点 MACE 减少的相对获益(风险比[HR]:0.90;p=0.04)在各亚组中基本一致。大出血事件发生率(总体:1.6%)不受糖尿病病程或 HbA 的影响,并且在所有亚组中替格瑞洛的增加程度相似(HR:2.32;p<0.001)。THEMIS-PCI 中也观察到了同样的结果。替格瑞洛加阿司匹林的疗效和安全性与基线抗高血糖治疗无关。在 THEMIS-PCI 中,但不在 THEMIS 中,替格瑞洛在糖尿病病程、HbA 和抗高血糖药物方面总体上产生了有利的净临床获益。
在 THEMIS-PCI 中,替格瑞洛加阿司匹林在与糖尿病相关的各种因素中产生了一致且有利的净临床获益,但在总体 THEMIS 人群中并非如此。