• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《经血管栓塞术使用药物洗脱微球标准操作技术推荐的中国专家共识》

Chinese expert consensus on technical recommendations for the standard operation of drug-eluting beads for transvascular embolization.

作者信息

Shao Guoliang, Zou Yinghua, Lucatelli Pierleone, Tsilimigras Diamantis I, Shimise Shigeo, Kawaguchi Takumi

机构信息

Department of Intervention, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China.

Department of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2021 Apr;9(8):714. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-1678.

DOI:10.21037/atm-21-1678
PMID:33987412
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8106009/
Abstract

Liver cancer is among the 10 most common tumors globally. In China, liver cancer ranks 4 for prevalence and 3 for mortality among all malignant tumors. With respect to the treatment of primary liver cancer, there are a number of therapies currently available, including surgical resection, liver transplantation, ablation, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), systemic chemotherapy, radiation therapy, targeted drug therapy and immunotherapy. Clinical practice and research have shown that, compared with conventional TACE (cTACE), drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) can achieve a higher response rate and longer survival time in patients with primary liver cancer. Compared with that of cTACE, DEB-TACE has more favorable basic conditions for achieving uniformity, which could facilitate the standardization of operation techniques. China is the country with the highest incidence of primary liver cancer, accounting for more than 50% of the global patients, and its etiology and epidemiology in Chinese patients differ from those in Europeans and Americans. Therefore, experts in China have drafted these technical recommendations for the standard operation of drug-eluting beads for the treatment of liver cancer on the basis of accumulated abundant clinical experience and evidence-based medical data.

摘要

肝癌是全球十大常见肿瘤之一。在中国,肝癌在所有恶性肿瘤中的发病率排名第4,死亡率排名第3。关于原发性肝癌的治疗,目前有多种治疗方法,包括手术切除、肝移植、消融、经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)、全身化疗、放射治疗、靶向药物治疗和免疫治疗。临床实践和研究表明,与传统TACE(cTACE)相比,载药微球TACE(DEB-TACE)在原发性肝癌患者中可实现更高的缓解率和更长的生存时间。与cTACE相比,DEB-TACE在实现均匀性方面具有更有利的基础条件,这有助于手术技术的标准化。中国是原发性肝癌发病率最高的国家,占全球患者的50%以上,其病因和流行病学在中国患者与欧美患者中有所不同。因此,中国专家在积累了丰富临床经验和循证医学数据的基础上,起草了这些肝癌治疗载药微球标准操作的技术建议。

相似文献

1
Chinese expert consensus on technical recommendations for the standard operation of drug-eluting beads for transvascular embolization.《经血管栓塞术使用药物洗脱微球标准操作技术推荐的中国专家共识》
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Apr;9(8):714. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-1678.
2
Comparison of Treatment Response and Survival Profiles Between Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization and Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization in Chinese Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.比较载药微球与常规经导管动脉化疗栓塞术治疗中国肝细胞癌患者的疗效和生存预后:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Oncol Res. 2019 May 7;27(5):583-592. doi: 10.3727/096504018X15368325811545.
3
CalliSpheres® drug-eluting beads (DEB) transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is equally efficient and safe in liver cancer patients with different times of previous conventional TACE treatments: a result from CTILC study.CalliSpheres® 载药微球(DEB)经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)治疗在不同时间接受过传统 TACE 治疗的肝癌患者中同样有效且安全:来自 CTILC 研究的结果。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2019 Feb;21(2):167-177. doi: 10.1007/s12094-018-1902-8. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
4
Conventional transarterial chemoembolization versus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.传统经动脉化疗栓塞术与载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗肝细胞癌的比较
BMC Cancer. 2015 Jun 10;15:465. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1480-x.
5
Comparison of lipiodol infusion and drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma in a real-life setting.在实际临床环境中肝细胞癌的碘油灌注与载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞术的比较
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul;54(7):905-912. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1632925. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
6
Conventional Versus Small Doxorubicin-eluting Bead Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Treating Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage 0/A Hepatocellular Carcinoma.常规与小剂量阿霉素洗脱微球经导管动脉化疗栓塞治疗巴塞罗那临床肝癌 0/A 期肝细胞癌。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020 Jan;43(1):55-64. doi: 10.1007/s00270-019-02349-9. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
7
CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads versus lipiodol transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a short-term efficacy and safety study.载药微球与碘化油动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌的短期疗效及安全性比较:一项短期疗效和安全性研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Mar 27;16(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1368-8.
8
Comparison of treatment efficacy and safety between drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres microspheres and conventional transarterial chemoembolization as first-line treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.载药微球(CalliSpheres)经动脉化疗栓塞术与传统经动脉化疗栓塞术作为肝细胞癌患者一线治疗的疗效与安全性比较
Am J Transl Res. 2019 Dec 15;11(12):7456-7470. eCollection 2019.
9
Transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization in locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞术与传统经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗局部晚期肝细胞癌的比较
Hepat Med. 2016 Jun 20;8:69-74. doi: 10.2147/HMER.S105395. eCollection 2016.
10
Five-year outcome of conventional and drug-eluting transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.肝细胞癌患者接受传统及药物洗脱经动脉化疗栓塞术的五年疗效
BMC Gastroenterol. 2018 Aug 3;18(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12876-018-0848-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison and trend analysis of cancer incidence in China and globally in 2022.2022年中国与全球癌症发病率的比较及趋势分析。
World J Clin Oncol. 2025 Jun 24;16(6):107016. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i6.107016.
2
The Efficacy of Combined Use of Huaier Granules in the Treatment of Primary Liver Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.槐耳颗粒联合应用治疗原发性肝癌的疗效:一项更新的系统评价与Meta分析
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Jun 13;18(6):884. doi: 10.3390/ph18060884.
3
Comparison of drug-eluting bead with conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a randomized clinical trial.药物洗脱微球与常规经导管动脉化疗栓塞治疗合并门静脉癌栓肝癌的随机临床试验比较。
Int J Surg. 2024 Sep 1;110(9):5527-5537. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001691.
4
Prediction of initial objective response to drug-eluting beads transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma using CT radiomics-based machine learning model.基于CT影像组学的机器学习模型预测药物洗脱微球经动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌的初始客观反应
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jan 25;15:1315732. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1315732. eCollection 2024.
5
Efficacy of CalliSpheres® microspheres versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of refractory colorectal cancer liver metastasis.CalliSpheres® 微球与常规经动脉化疗栓塞治疗难治性结直肠癌肝转移的疗效比较。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Oct 12;23(1):970. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11350-y.
6
Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Bead TACE in the Treatment of Primary or Secondary Liver Cancer.载药微球动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性或继发性肝癌的疗效及安全性。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Apr 26;2023:5492931. doi: 10.1155/2023/5492931. eCollection 2023.
7
In vitro comparative study of multimodal imaging nano-assembled microspheres with two clinical drug-eluting beads loaded with doxorubicin.载多柔比星的两种临床载药微球的纳米组装型多功能成像微球的体外对比研究。
Drug Deliv. 2023 Dec;30(1):2197177. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2023.2197177.
8
Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization could improve the hepatic hemodynamics of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞可改善不可切除肝细胞癌患者的肝脏血流动力学:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023 Feb 28;14(1):302-311. doi: 10.21037/jgo-23-76. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
9
Drug-eluting Microspheres Compared to Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization as First Line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-center Retrospective Cost-utility Analysis.载药微球与常规经动脉化疗栓塞作为不可切除肝细胞癌一线治疗的比较:单中心回顾性成本效用分析。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023 Mar;46(3):319-326. doi: 10.1007/s00270-022-03335-4. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
10
Single medium-sized hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sequential conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) and microwave ablation at 4 weeks versus cTACE alone: a propensity score.4 周时序常规经导管动脉化疗栓塞(cTACE)联合微波消融与单纯 cTACE 治疗单个中等大小肝细胞癌的疗效比较:倾向评分匹配研究
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Jun 10;20(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02643-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization sequentially combined with radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of untreated and recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞序贯联合射频消融治疗初治及复发性肝细胞癌
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Aug 27;12(8):355-368. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v12.i8.355.
2
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios as predictors of tumor response in hepatocellular carcinoma after DEB-TACE.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和血小板与淋巴细胞比值可预测 DEB-TACE 后肝癌患者的肿瘤反应。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Oct;30(10):5663-5673. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06931-5. Epub 2020 May 19.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization by CalliSpheres in 275 Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: Results From the Chinese CalliSpheres Transarterial Chemoembolization in Liver Cancer (CTILC) Study.载药微球动脉化疗栓塞术治疗 275 例肝癌患者的疗效和安全性:来自中国载药微球肝癌化疗栓塞术(CTILC)研究的结果。
Oncol Res. 2020 Feb 7;28(1):75-94. doi: 10.3727/096504019X15662966719585. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
4
Transarterial Chemoembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Idarubicin-Loaded Tandem Drug-Eluting Embolics.载有伊达比星的串联药物洗脱栓塞剂经动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Jul 15;11(7):987. doi: 10.3390/cancers11070987.
5
Long-term Histopathologic Follow-up of a Spherical Embolic Agent; Observation of the Transvascular Migration of HepaSphere.球形栓塞剂的长期组织病理学随访;HepaSphere经血管迁移的观察
BJR Case Rep. 2019 Jan 25;5(1):20180066. doi: 10.1259/bjrcr.20180066. eCollection 2019 Feb.
6
Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) vs conventional TACE in treating hepatocellular carcinoma patients with multiple conventional TACE treatments history: A comparison of efficacy and safety.载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)与传统TACE治疗有多次传统TACE治疗史的肝细胞癌患者的疗效和安全性比较
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(21):e15314. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015314.
7
Multidisciplinary Taiwan Consensus Recommendations for the Use of DEBDOX-TACE in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment.台湾多学科关于在肝细胞癌治疗中使用载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞术(DEBDOX-TACE)的共识推荐
Liver Cancer. 2018 Oct;7(4):312-322. doi: 10.1159/000487608. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
8
Updated use of TACE for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment: How and when to use it based on clinical evidence.基于临床证据的肝细胞癌 TACE 治疗更新:如何以及何时使用。
Cancer Treat Rev. 2019 Jan;72:28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
9
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
10
Efficacy and safety of raltitrexed-based transarterial chemoembolization for colorectal cancer liver metastases.基于雷替曲塞的经动脉化疗栓塞治疗结直肠癌肝转移的疗效和安全性。
Anticancer Drugs. 2018 Nov;29(10):1021-1025. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000690.