Suppr超能文献

针对≥65 岁成年人的更新 PCV13 疫苗推荐意见的医师调查。

Physician survey regarding updated PCV13 vaccine recommendations for adults ≥65 years.

机构信息

Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Division of General Internal Medicine, Denver Health, Denver, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Sep;69(9):2612-2618. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17274. Epub 2021 May 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In June 2019, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended discontinuing the routine use of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) among adults aged ≥65 years and instead recommended PCV13 be used based on shared clinical decision making (SCDM).

OBJECTIVES

We wanted to assess among primary care physicians (1) knowledge and attitudes regarding the new SCDM PCV13 recommendation and (2) how the new recommendation will affect their likelihood of recommending PCV13 to adults aged ≥65 years.

DESIGN

This was done by mail and internet-based survey, which was conducted October 2019 through January 2020. The study was carried out on a nationally representative sample of general internists (GIMs) and family physicians (FPs).

RESULTS

The response rate was 64% (617/968, GIM 57%, FP 71%). Only 41% of respondents were aware of the SCDM PCV13 recommendation in adults aged ≥65 years; 76% agreed (37% "Strongly," 39% "Somewhat") that their patients aged ≥65 years will get confused by having a SCDM recommendation for PCV13 and a routine recommendation for the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23); 60% agreed (18% "Strongly," 42% "Somewhat") that they were unsure of what points to emphasize when having a SCDM conversation with an adult aged ≥65 years about receiving PCV13. Just over 50% reported they would be less likely to recommend PCV13 for adults aged ≥65 years as a result of the new recommendation, but 42% reported that their recommendation for PCV13 would not change.

CONCLUSIONS

Word of the new ACIP recommendation for PCV13 for adults aged ≥65 years needs to be further disseminated. Investigation into why some physicians do not plan to change their recommendations is warranted.

摘要

背景

2019 年 6 月,免疫实践咨询委员会建议停止对 65 岁以上成年人常规使用肺炎球菌结合疫苗(PCV13),转而建议根据共同临床决策(SCDM)使用 PCV13。

目的

我们希望评估初级保健医生(1)对新的 SCDM PCV13 推荐的知识和态度,以及(2)新建议将如何影响他们向 65 岁以上成年人推荐 PCV13 的可能性。

设计

这是通过邮件和互联网调查完成的,调查于 2019 年 10 月至 2020 年 1 月进行。该研究在全国代表性的普通内科医生(GIM)和家庭医生(FP)样本中进行。

结果

回复率为 64%(617/968,GIM 为 57%,FP 为 71%)。只有 41%的受访者知道 65 岁以上成年人的 SCDM PCV13 推荐;76%的人同意(37%“强烈同意”,39%“有些同意”),他们的 65 岁以上患者会因为对 PCV13 的 SCDM 推荐和对肺炎球菌多糖疫苗(PPSV23)的常规推荐而感到困惑;60%的人同意(18%“强烈同意”,42%“有些同意”),他们不确定在与 65 岁以上成年人进行 SCDM 对话时强调哪些要点;略多于 50%的人报告说,由于新建议,他们不太可能为 65 岁以上成年人推荐 PCV13,但 42%的人报告说,他们对 PCV13 的推荐不会改变。

结论

需要进一步传播新的 ACIP 关于 65 岁以上成年人 PCV13 的推荐建议。值得调查一些医生为何不打算改变他们的建议。

相似文献

1
Physician survey regarding updated PCV13 vaccine recommendations for adults ≥65 years.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Sep;69(9):2612-2618. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17274. Epub 2021 May 14.
2
US Primary Care Physicians' Viewpoints on HPV Vaccination for Adults 27 to 45 Years.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2021 Jan-Feb;34(1):162-170. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.01.200408.
4
Primary Care Physicians' Struggle with Current Adult Pneumococcal Vaccine Recommendations.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Jan-Feb;31(1):94-104. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.01.170216.
9
Recent Developments and Future Directions of Pneumococcal Vaccine Recommendations.
Clin Ther. 2015 May 1;37(5):928-34. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.03.025. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
10
Shared Clinical Decision-Making Recommendations for Adult Immunization: What Do Physicians Think?
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Aug;36(8):2283-2291. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06456-z. Epub 2021 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the future adult vaccine landscape-crowded schedules and new dynamics.
NPJ Vaccines. 2024 Feb 9;9(1):27. doi: 10.1038/s41541-024-00809-z.
3
Clinical and Public Health Considerations for HPV Vaccination in Midadulthood: A Narrative Review.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 11;10(1):ofad004. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad004. eCollection 2023 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Shared clinical decision making on vaccines: Nothing has really changed for pharmacists.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020 Nov-Dec;60(6):e91-e94. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2020.06.027. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of Pneumococcal Vaccination Policies and Uptake Programs in US Older Populations.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jun;68(6):1271-1278. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16373. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
3
Pneumococcal Vaccination in Adults Aged ≥65 Years: Cost-Effectiveness and Health Impact in U.S. Populations.
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Apr;58(4):487-495. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.10.022. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
6
Human Papillomavirus Vaccination for Adults: Updated Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Aug 16;68(32):698-702. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6832a3.
7
Realizing Shared Decision-making in Practice.
JAMA. 2019 Sep 3;322(9):811-812. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.9797.
9
Shared Decision-making and Lung Cancer Screening: Let's Get the Conversation Started.
Chest. 2019 Jan;155(1):21-24. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.10.013. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
10
A method for achieving high response rates in national surveys of U.S. primary care physicians.
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 23;13(8):e0202755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202755. eCollection 2018.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验