• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交焦虑障碍认知行为疗法期间及之后的注意偏向动态变化与症状严重程度

Attention bias dynamics and symptom severity during and following CBT for social anxiety disorder.

作者信息

Davis Michelle L, Rosenfield David, Bernstein Amit, Zvielli Ariel, Reinecke Andrea, Beevers Christopher G, Koster Ernst H W, Smits Jasper A J

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

Department of Psychology, Southern Methodist University.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Sep;84(9):795-802. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000125.

DOI:10.1037/ccp0000125
PMID:27362791
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Threat-related attention bias figures prominently in contemporary accounts of the maintenance of anxiety disorders, yet longitudinal intervention research relating attention bias to anxiety symptom severity is limited. Capitalizing on recent advances in the conceptualization and measurement of attention bias, we aimed to examine the relation between attention bias, indexed using trial-level bias scores (TLBSs) to quantify temporal dynamics reflecting dysregulation of attentional processing of threat (as opposed to aggregated mean bias scores) and social anxiety symptom severity over the course of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and 1-month follow-up.

METHOD

Adults with social anxiety disorder (N = 39) assigned to either yohimbine- or placebo-augmented CBT completed measures of attention bias and social anxiety symptom severity weekly throughout CBT (5 sessions) and at 1-week and 1-month posttreatment.

RESULTS

TLBSs of attention bias temporal dynamics showed stronger psychometric properties than mean aggregated scores and were highly interrelated, in line with within-subject temporal variability fluctuating in time between attentional overengagement and strategic avoidance from threat. Attention bias toward threat and temporal variability in attention bias (i.e., attentional dysregulation), but not attention bias away from threat, significantly reduced over the course of CBT. Cross-lag analyses revealed no evidence of a causal relation between reductions in attentional dysregulation leading to symptom severity reduction, or vice versa. Observed relations did not vary as a function of time.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence for attentional dysregulation as a causal mechanism for symptom reduction in CBT for social anxiety disorders. Implications for future research are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

目的

与威胁相关的注意偏向在当代焦虑障碍维持机制的描述中占据显著地位,但将注意偏向与焦虑症状严重程度相关联的纵向干预研究却很有限。利用注意偏向概念化和测量方面的最新进展,我们旨在考察注意偏向(使用试验水平偏差分数(TLBSs)进行索引,以量化反映威胁性注意加工失调的时间动态变化,而非汇总平均偏差分数)与社交焦虑症状严重程度在认知行为疗法(CBT)过程及1个月随访期间的关系。

方法

患有社交焦虑障碍的成年人(N = 39)被分配接受育亨宾增强或安慰剂增强的CBT,在整个CBT过程(5次疗程)中每周完成注意偏向和社交焦虑症状严重程度的测量,并在治疗后1周和1个月进行测量。

结果

注意偏向时间动态的TLBSs显示出比平均汇总分数更强的心理测量特性,且高度相关,这与个体内部时间变异性在对威胁的注意过度投入和策略性回避之间随时间波动一致。在CBT过程中,对威胁的注意偏向和注意偏向的时间变异性(即注意失调)显著降低,但对威胁的注意偏向则没有。交叉滞后分析没有发现注意失调减少导致症状严重程度降低,或反之亦然的因果关系证据。观察到的关系不随时间变化。

结论

我们没有发现注意失调是社交焦虑障碍CBT中症状减轻的因果机制的证据。讨论了对未来研究的启示。(PsycINFO数据库记录

相似文献

1
Attention bias dynamics and symptom severity during and following CBT for social anxiety disorder.社交焦虑障碍认知行为疗法期间及之后的注意偏向动态变化与症状严重程度
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Sep;84(9):795-802. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000125.
2
An integrative network approach to social anxiety disorder: The complex dynamic interplay among attentional bias for threat, attentional control, and symptoms.一种综合的网络方法来研究社交焦虑障碍:威胁注意偏向、注意控制和症状之间复杂的动态相互作用。
J Anxiety Disord. 2016 Aug;42:95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
3
A pilot randomized clinical trial of cognitive behavioral therapy versus attentional bias modification for social anxiety disorder: An examination of outcomes and theory-based mechanisms.一项认知行为疗法与注意偏向矫正治疗社交焦虑障碍的随机临床试验:对结果和基于理论机制的考察。
J Anxiety Disord. 2018 Oct;59:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
4
The influence of attention biases and adult attachment style on treatment outcome for adults with social anxiety disorder.注意偏向和成人依恋风格对社交焦虑障碍成人患者治疗结果的影响。
J Affect Disord. 2017 Aug 1;217:281-288. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.04.018. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
5
Attention bias modification augments cognitive-behavioral group therapy for social anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled trial.注意偏向修正增强认知行为团体治疗社交焦虑障碍:一项随机对照试验。
Psychol Med. 2018 Oct;48(13):2177-2185. doi: 10.1017/S003329171700366X. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
6
Attentional biases to threat in social anxiety disorder: time to focus our attention elsewhere?社交焦虑障碍中对威胁的注意力偏差:是时候将注意力转移到其他地方了吗?
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2018 Sep;31(5):555-570. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2018.1483497. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
7
Effects of attention bias modification with short and long stimulus-duration: A randomized experiment with individuals with subclinical social anxiety.注意偏向修正对短刺激时长和长刺激时长的影响:一项对亚临床社交焦虑个体的随机实验。
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Jun 30;240:80-87. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.04.019. Epub 2016 Apr 10.
8
Attention and interpretation bias modification treatment for social anxiety disorder: A randomized clinical trial of efficacy and synergy.社交焦虑障碍的注意力与解释偏差矫正治疗:一项关于疗效与协同作用的随机临床试验
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;59:19-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2017.10.006. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
9
Attention Bias Modification Treatment for Adolescents With Social Anxiety Disorder.注意偏向修正治疗对社交焦虑障碍青少年的作用。
Behav Ther. 2019 Jan;50(1):126-139. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2018.04.002. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
10
Cognitive bias modification and CBT as early interventions for adolescent social and test anxiety: Two-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.认知偏差矫正与认知行为疗法作为青少年社交焦虑和考试焦虑的早期干预措施:一项随机对照试验的两年随访
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;55:81-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.11.011. Epub 2016 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of Repeated Attachment Security Priming on Social Anxiety and Attention Bias: A Randomized Controlled Trial.重复依恋安全感启动对社交焦虑和注意偏向的影响:一项随机对照试验
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 May 16;13(5):420. doi: 10.3390/bs13050420.
2
Reliability of attention bias and attention bias variability to climate change images in the dot-probe task.点探测任务中对气候变化图像的注意偏向和注意偏向变异性的可靠性
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 12;13:1021858. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1021858. eCollection 2022.
3
The questionable validity of attention bias variability: Evidence from two conceptually unrelated cognitive tasks.
注意偏向变异性的有效性存疑:来自两项概念上不相关认知任务的证据。
J Affect Disord Rep. 2022 Dec;10. doi: 10.1016/j.jadr.2022.100411. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
4
Biased Maintenance of Attention on Sad Faces in Clinically Depressed Youth: An Eye-Tracking Study.临床抑郁青少年对悲伤面孔注意力偏向的维持:一项眼动研究。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2023 Feb;54(1):189-201. doi: 10.1007/s10578-021-01229-z. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
5
Heterogeneity of the Anxiety-Related Attention Bias: A Review and Working Model for Future Research.焦虑相关注意偏向的异质性:综述与未来研究的工作模型
Clin Psychol Sci. 2019 Sep 1;7(5):879-899. doi: 10.1177/2167702619838474. Epub 2019 May 14.
6
The stability and reliability of attentional bias measures in the dot-probe task: Evidence from both traditional mean bias scores and trial-level bias scores.点探测任务中注意偏向测量的稳定性和可靠性:来自传统平均偏向分数和试验水平偏向分数的证据。
Motiv Emot. 2020 Oct;44(5):657-669. doi: 10.1007/s11031-020-09834-6. Epub 2020 May 24.
7
Visual attention to emotional faces in adolescents with social anxiety disorder receiving cognitive behavioral therapy.社交焦虑障碍青少年接受认知行为治疗时对情绪面孔的视觉注意。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 22;14(11):e0225603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225603. eCollection 2019.
8
Dynamic Measures of Anxiety-Related Threat Bias: Links to Stress Reactivity.焦虑相关威胁偏差的动态测量:与应激反应性的联系
Motiv Emot. 2018 Aug;42(4):546-554. doi: 10.1007/s11031-018-9674-6. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
9
Depression: A cognitive perspective.抑郁:认知视角。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 Apr;69:51-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.06.008. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
10
Capturing Dynamics of Biased Attention: Are New Attention Variability Measures the Way Forward?捕捉偏向性注意力的动态变化:新的注意力变异性测量方法是前进的方向吗?
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 22;11(11):e0166600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166600. eCollection 2016.