Suppr超能文献

注意力控制方面的个体差异解释了创伤后应激症状患者中与威胁相关的注意力偏向的差异表达,并预测了长达一年后的症状维持情况。

Individual differences in attentional control explain the differential expression of threat-related attentional bias among those with posttraumatic stress symptomatology and predict symptom maintenance up to one year later.

作者信息

Bardeen Joseph R, Daniel Thomas A, Gordon Robert D, Hinnant J Benjamin, Weathers Frank W

机构信息

Auburn University, USA.

Westfield State University, USA.

出版信息

Behav Res Ther. 2020 Oct;133:103709. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2020.103709. Epub 2020 Aug 10.

Abstract

Individual differences in attentional control may explain null findings and inconsistent patterns of threat-related attentional bias (ABT) that are common in the posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) literature. At Time 1 (T1), trauma-exposed community participants (N = 89) completed a clinical interview, self-report measures, and an eye-tracking task developed to assess ABT. Participants completed follow-up assessments online 6 (T2) and 12 (T3) months later. Those with higher PTSD symptoms and deficits in attentional control exhibited a pattern of undercontrol, characterized by attention maintenance on threat and increased arousal. In contrast, those with higher PTSD symptoms and relatively better attentional control exhibited a pattern of overcontrol, characterized by threat avoidance and reduced arousal. These effects were specific to threat stimuli. Among PTSD symptom clusters, symptoms of hyperarousal were of central importance to the observed effects. Results from the longitudinal analysis indicate that both of these patterns of ABT are maladaptive, resulting in symptom maintenance at T2 and T3. These results have implications for (a) reconciling tensions between disparate models of ABT (i.e., vigilance-avoidance vs. attention maintenance), (b) precision medicine based approaches to targeting PTSD-related ABT, and (c) understanding the transdiagnostic role that attentional control may play in influencing ABT expression.

摘要

注意力控制方面的个体差异可能解释了创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)文献中常见的与威胁相关的注意力偏差(ABT)的无效结果和不一致模式。在时间1(T1),暴露于创伤的社区参与者(N = 89)完成了临床访谈、自我报告测量以及一项为评估ABT而开发的眼动追踪任务。参与者在6个月(T2)和12个月(T3)后在线完成随访评估。那些PTSD症状较重且注意力控制存在缺陷的人表现出一种控制不足的模式,其特征是对威胁的注意力维持和唤醒增加。相比之下,那些PTSD症状较重但注意力控制相对较好的人表现出一种过度控制的模式,其特征是回避威胁和唤醒降低。这些效应特定于威胁刺激。在PTSD症状群中,过度唤醒症状对观察到的效应至关重要。纵向分析结果表明,这两种ABT模式都是适应不良的,导致在T2和T3时症状持续存在。这些结果对以下方面具有启示意义:(a)调和ABT不同模型之间的矛盾(即警觉-回避与注意力维持),(b)基于精准医学的方法来针对与PTSD相关的ABT,以及(c)理解注意力控制在影响ABT表达中可能发挥的跨诊断作用。

相似文献

4
Attention bias toward threatening faces in women with PTSD: eye tracking correlates by symptom cluster.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2019 Feb 13;10(1):1568133. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1568133. eCollection 2019.
7
Gender Differences in Threat Biases: Trauma Type Matters in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.
J Trauma Stress. 2019 Oct;32(5):701-711. doi: 10.1002/jts.22439. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
8
Attentional bias and attentional control in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.
J Anxiety Disord. 2014 Mar;28(2):203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.10.001. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
10
Attention to threat in posttraumatic stress disorder as indexed by eye-tracking indices: a systematic review.
Psychol Med. 2019 Apr;49(5):705-726. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718002313. Epub 2018 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining attentional avoidance in post-traumatic stress disorder: an exploratory 'Face in the Crowd' paradigm using eye-tracking.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2462489. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2462489. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
3
Effects of MDMA-assisted therapy for PTSD on self-experience.
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 10;19(1):e0295926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295926. eCollection 2024.
4
Why We Need a Developmentally Appropriate Trauma Diagnosis for Children: a 10-Year Update on Developmental Trauma Disorder.
J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2021 Nov 19;16(2):403-418. doi: 10.1007/s40653-021-00415-4. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Attention allocation in posttraumatic stress disorder: an eye-tracking study.
Psychol Med. 2021 Feb 26:1-10. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721000581.

本文引用的文献

1
Heterogeneity of the Anxiety-Related Attention Bias: A Review and Working Model for Future Research.
Clin Psychol Sci. 2019 Sep 1;7(5):879-899. doi: 10.1177/2167702619838474. Epub 2019 May 14.
2
Dissociating Attention and Eye Movements in a Quantitative Analysis of Attention Allocation.
Front Psychol. 2017 May 17;8:715. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00715. eCollection 2017.
4
Relationships among attention networks and physiological responding to threat.
Brain Cogn. 2017 Feb;111:63-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2016.09.012. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
5
The interaction effect of attentional bias and attentional control on dispositional anxiety among adolescents.
Br J Psychol. 2017 Aug;108(3):564-582. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12225. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
6
The Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5): Development and Evaluation Within a Veteran Primary Care Sample.
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Oct;31(10):1206-11. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3703-5. Epub 2016 May 11.
7
The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation.
J Trauma Stress. 2015 Dec;28(6):489-98. doi: 10.1002/jts.22059. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
8
Effect of Attention Training on Attention Bias Variability and PTSD Symptoms: Randomized Controlled Trials in Israeli and U.S. Combat Veterans.
Am J Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;172(12):1233-41. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.14121578. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
9
636,120 Ways to Have Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Nov;8(6):651-62. doi: 10.1177/1745691613504115.
10
Confirmatory factor analyses of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in psychiatric samples differing in Criterion A status.
J Anxiety Disord. 2015 Aug;34:15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.05.009. Epub 2015 Jun 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验