Effects of analgesic and surgical modality on immune response in colorectal cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Different surgical methods, anesthesia, and analgesia are known to modify the surgical stress response, especially in patients with malignancy. We compared the impact of patient-controlled intravenous (PCA) versus epidural analgesia (EDA) on tumor-related mucosal immune response in patients undergoing open or laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.

METHODS

In a University Hospital subgroup (n = 43) of a larger cohort (n = 235) of patients undergoing open or laparoscopic surgery for colorectal carcinoma randomized to PCA or EDA, colorectal tissues were stained for interleukin-10 (IL-10), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and mast cell tryptase and then examined by immunofluorescence microscopy.

RESULTS

More IL-10-cells were found in patients undergoing open compared to laparoscopic surgery in the PCA (P < 0.05) and EDA group (P < 0.0005), respectively, and numbers of TNF-cells were higher in the open surgery group who received PCA (P < 0.05). No differences in IL-10 or TNF expressions were detected between EDA/PCA within the open or laparoscopic surgery groups, respectively. Fewer mast cells were observed in patients undergoing laparoscopic compared to open surgery combined with PCA (P < 0.05). Within the open surgery group, EDA resulted in fewer mucosal mast cells compared to the PCA group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical method, rather than type of analgesia, may have higher impact on peri-operative inflammation. Laparoscopic surgery when combined with EDA for colorectal cancer caused a decrease in the TNF and IL-10 expression and mast cells. EDA seems to have an anti-inflammatory effect on cancer-related inflammation during open surgery.