Research Institute of Petroleum Processing, Sinopec, Beijing 100083, China; State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.
Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, The First Hospital Affiliated with Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong 250014, China.
Environ Int. 2021 Nov;156:106637. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106637. Epub 2021 May 13.
Associations between per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and the incidence of type 2 diabetes are controversial in epidemiological studies. In addition, limited data are available for assessing the health effects of novel PFAS alternatives. Our study evaluated the effects of PFAS exposure on type 2 diabetes by estimating the associations of PFASs in human serum with the risk of type 2 diabetes and levels of glycemic biomarkers and lipid fractions. The case-control study consisted of 304 participants from Shandong Province, East China, half of which were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Logistic regression showed that most PFASs were inversely associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes after adjusting for age, sex, and body mass index. However, concentrations of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in the control group were positively associated with fasting plasma glucose levels (β = 0.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.0003, 0.08), which may promote the development of type 2 diabetes. Furthermore, each log-unit increase in the concentrations of perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), perfluoroundecanoic acid (PFUnDA), and 6:2 chlorinated polyfluoroalkyl ether sulfonic acid (Cl-PFESA) were associated with a total cholesterol increase (i.e., 17.49% (95% CI: 0.93%, 34.90%), 17.49% (95% CI: 4.71%, 31.83%), and 17.49% (95% CI: 4.71%, 31.83%), respectively). Positive associations were also observed between PFNA, PFUnDA, perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), and 6:2 Cl-PFESA and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. However, no associations between PFASs and hemoglobin A1c, triglycerides, or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol reached statistical significance, nor associations between PFAS mixtures and outcomes of interest. In conclusion, the significant correlations between serum PFASs and glycemic biomarkers and lipid fractions indicated that PFAS exposure may be a potential diabetogenic factor. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the associations between novel Cl-PFESAs and type 2 diabetes, although the inverse associations observed require clarification in future studies.
全氟及多氟烷基物质(PFAS)与 2 型糖尿病之间的关联在流行病学研究中存在争议。此外,用于评估新型 PFAS 替代品健康影响的数据有限。我们的研究通过估计人体血清中 PFAS 与 2 型糖尿病风险以及血糖生物标志物和脂质分数之间的关联,评估了 PFAS 暴露对 2 型糖尿病的影响。这项病例对照研究包括来自中国华东地区山东省的 304 名参与者,其中一半被诊断患有 2 型糖尿病。逻辑回归显示,在调整年龄、性别和体重指数后,大多数 PFAS 与 2 型糖尿病的风险呈负相关。然而,对照组中全氟辛酸(PFOA)的浓度与空腹血糖水平呈正相关(β=0.04,95%置信区间(CI):0.0003,0.08),这可能促进 2 型糖尿病的发展。此外,浓度每增加一个对数单位的全氟壬酸(PFNA)、全氟十一酸(PFUnDA)和 6:2 氯代全氟烷磺酸(Cl-PFESA),总胆固醇就会增加(即分别为 17.49%(95%CI:0.93%,34.90%)、17.49%(95%CI:4.71%,31.83%)和 17.49%(95%CI:4.71%,31.83%))。PFNA、PFUnDA、全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)和 6:2 Cl-PFESA 与低密度脂蛋白胆固醇之间也存在正相关。然而,PFAS 与血红蛋白 A1c、甘油三酯或高密度脂蛋白胆固醇之间没有达到统计学意义的关联,PFAS 混合物与研究结果之间也没有关联。总之,血清 PFAS 与血糖生物标志物和脂质分数之间的显著相关性表明,PFAS 暴露可能是潜在的致糖尿病因素。据我们所知,这是第一项评估新型 Cl-PFESAs 与 2 型糖尿病之间关联的研究,尽管观察到的反比关联需要在未来的研究中加以澄清。