• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学智慧。

Medical Wisdom.

出版信息

Perspect Biol Med. 2021;64(2):251-270. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2021.0019.

DOI:10.1353/pbm.2021.0019
PMID:33994396
Abstract

Wise medical actions hinge on deliberative judgment. In the medical context, deliberation requires a grasp of a problem's relevant generalizations, its particulars, and their interactions. The process of generalization, rooted in the advancement and application of scientific knowledge and statistical methods, is well understood. But particularization, the process of teasing out relevant unique features of a case, is obscure, neglected, or even trivialized. Physicians must take the time necessary to identify, carefully disentangle, and weigh the various biological, interpersonal, contextual, technical, and ethical facets of a case. Not only are such details fundamental to making worthwhile and acceptably achievable medical decisions, but a practiced dealing with these details is a key feature of wisdom in medicine. This essay proposes a set of strategies to guide physicians in achieving a thorough understanding of individual cases and their constituent particulars, a proposal informed by extensive experiences in the clinic and classroom and by a review of the literature, and enriched by consultations with colleagues from multiple disciplines in medicine and the humanities.

摘要

明智的医疗行动取决于审慎的判断。在医学背景下,审慎的判断需要掌握问题的相关概括、细节及其相互作用。概括的过程源于科学知识和统计方法的推进和应用,这一过程是被充分理解的。但是,具体化——即梳理出病例中相关独特特征的过程——则是模糊的、被忽视的,甚至被轻视。医生必须花时间识别、仔细梳理并权衡病例中各种生物的、人际的、背景的、技术的和伦理的方面。这些细节不仅是做出有价值且可接受的医疗决策的基础,而且熟练地处理这些细节是医学智慧的一个关键特征。本文提出了一系列策略,旨在指导医生全面理解个体病例及其组成的细节,这一建议是基于丰富的临床和课堂经验、文献回顾,并通过与医学和人文学科的多个学科的同事进行咨询而得到充实的。

相似文献

1
Medical Wisdom.医学智慧。
Perspect Biol Med. 2021;64(2):251-270. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2021.0019.
2
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
3
A model for faculty development and continuing education in medical ethics: medicine and humanities consultations.医学伦理学教师发展与继续教育模式:医学与人文咨询
Tex Med. 1991 Feb;87(2):91-5.
4
How to evaluate the quality of an ethical deliberation? A pragmatist proposal for evaluation criteria and collaborative research.如何评估伦理审议的质量?评估标准和协作研究的实用主义建议。
Med Health Care Philos. 2022 Sep;25(3):309-326. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10091-2. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
5
Being skeptical about the medical humanities.对医学人文学科持怀疑态度。
J Med Humanit. 1995 Winter;16(4):265-77. doi: 10.1007/BF02276583.
6
Translational Metabolomics of Head Injury: Exploring Dysfunctional Cerebral Metabolism with Ex Vivo NMR Spectroscopy-Based Metabolite Quantification头部损伤的转化代谢组学:基于体外核磁共振波谱的代谢物定量分析探索脑代谢功能障碍
7
Teaching practical wisdom in medicine through clinical judgement, goals of care, and ethical reasoning.通过临床判断、护理目标和伦理推理来教授医学实践智慧。
J Med Ethics. 2010 Sep;36(9):558-62. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.035295.
8
The practice of health care: wisdom as a model.医疗保健实践:以智慧为典范。
Med Health Care Philos. 2007 Sep;10(3):233-44. doi: 10.1007/s11019-006-9033-3. Epub 2006 Nov 21.
9
The Shared Goals and Distinct Strengths of the Medical Humanities: Can the Sum of the Parts Be Greater Than the Whole?医学人文的共同目标与独特优势:各部分之和能否大于整体?
Acad Med. 2017 Dec;92(12):1661-1664. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001991.
10
The Biomedical Humanities program: merging humanities and science in a premedical curriculum at Hiram College.生物医学人文学科项目:在希拉姆学院的医学预科课程中将人文学科与科学融合。
Acad Med. 2003 Oct;78(10):993-6. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200310000-00010.

引用本文的文献

1
Transformations in medical education: A prudential perspective.医学教育的变革:一种审慎的视角。
Health Care Sci. 2024 Mar 18;3(2):73-77. doi: 10.1002/hcs2.86. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Discovering clinical phronesis.发现临床实践智慧。
Med Health Care Philos. 2024 Jun;27(2):165-179. doi: 10.1007/s11019-024-10198-8. Epub 2024 Mar 7.