Wulandari Laksmi, Soegiarto Gatot, Febriani Anna, Fatmawati Farah
Thoracic Oncology Division, Department of Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga - Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Jl. Mayjen Prof. Dr. Moestopo no. 6-8, Surabaya, 60286 Indonesia.
Clinical Immunology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga - Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, 60286 Indonesia.
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2021 Apr;12(Suppl 1):65-71. doi: 10.1007/s13193-020-01046-1. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
The ctDNA plasma testing is one of the methods to examine biomarkers for lung adenocarcinoma in order to detect a mutation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene. The advantages of ctDNA testing over tissue biopsy and lung tumor cytology include less invasive, faster result, cheaper, and minimum risk of complication for the patient. We analyzed and compare the detection of EFGR mutation in peripheral blood plasma (liquid biopsy) with cytological specimens of patients with lung adenocarcinoma. We conducted ctDNA plasma testing in 124 lung adenocarcinoma patients who visited our hospital from January to December 2018. The ctDNA testing results were compared with the results of EGFR detection from the previous cytological specimen examination. Most of the patients were males, aged 55-59 years, nonsmokers, and had stage IVA lung adenocarcinoma, with most metastasis found in the pleura. We found a correlation between EGFR prevalence with nonsmoking status and patient's age. The ctDNA plasma testing detected 27.4% common EGFR mutation and 72.6% wild-type EGFR. The figures of EGFR mutation detection from cytological specimens were 47.6% and 52.4%, respectively. Compared to cytological specimens, the EGFR mutation detection in ctDNA had a sensitivity of 48.3%, with a specificity of 90.9%, PPV of 82.35%, NPV of 66.7%, and 70.97% concordance rate. EGFR mutation with cytological specimen examination was more accurate than ctDNA.
循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)血浆检测是检测肺腺癌生物标志物以检测表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)基因突变的方法之一。与组织活检和肺肿瘤细胞学检查相比,ctDNA检测具有侵入性小、结果出得快、成本低以及患者并发症风险最小等优点。我们分析并比较了肺腺癌患者外周血血浆(液体活检)中EGFR突变的检测结果与细胞学标本的检测结果。我们对2018年1月至12月来我院就诊的124例肺腺癌患者进行了ctDNA血浆检测。将ctDNA检测结果与先前细胞学标本检查的EGFR检测结果进行比较。大多数患者为男性,年龄在55 - 59岁之间,不吸烟,患有IVA期肺腺癌,大部分转移发生在胸膜。我们发现EGFR的患病率与不吸烟状态和患者年龄之间存在相关性。ctDNA血浆检测发现27.4%的常见EGFR突变和72.6%的野生型EGFR。细胞学标本中EGFR突变检测的比例分别为47.6%和52.4%。与细胞学标本相比,ctDNA中EGFR突变检测的灵敏度为48.3%,特异性为90.9%,阳性预测值为82.35%,阴性预测值为66.7%,一致性率为70.97%。细胞学标本检查的EGFR突变比ctDNA检测更准确。