Ferrell Anastasiya, Hadddad Linda, Harrison Elder Jennifer, Garvan Cyndi, Cook Christa L, Salloum Ramzi
School of Nursing, University of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, NC, USA.
College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Tob Use Insights. 2020 Sep 4;13:1179173X20953402. doi: 10.1177/1179173X20953402. eCollection 2020.
Rapid increase in youth use of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) led the state and the federal governments to implement minimum-age policies to restrict minors' access to vaping products. Limited success of the age restrictions fueled efforts to increase the distribution age of all tobacco products to 21 (ie, Tobacco 21 or T21 policies). With limited data on the T21 policies, the current study examines the prevalence of ENDS use and the perceptions about ENDS among youth in the pre- and post-policy-implementation periods for one of these bans in the state of Florida.
This study conducted secondary analysis on the responses from the 2014 and 2015 Florida Youth Tobacco Survey, which collected cross-sectional data.
Compared to the data from spring of 2014, the minimum-age policy enacted on July 1, 2014 did not lead to a significant decrease in Florida's high school and middle school students' ENDS use (14.9% in 2014 vs 25.8% in 2015) and ENDS use (7.5% in 2014 vs 12.4% in 2015). There was some ambiguity among students regarding the ENDS harm-more students in 2015 thought of ENDS as both equally (11.0% vs 7.7%) and less (32.4% vs 28%) harmful than cigarettes. There was a decrease in the proportion of students who were unsure about their answer to this question (51.5% vs 59.2%).
Policy change alone may not be effective in shifting the trend of ENDS use among middle and high school students. Although students may know about some of the ENDS effects, many of them are still not aware about the harms. Interventions in school and in the community should be aiming to raise this awareness.
青少年使用电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS)的人数迅速增加,促使州政府和联邦政府实施最低年龄政策,以限制未成年人获取电子烟产品。年龄限制措施成效有限,这推动了将所有烟草产品的销售年龄提高到21岁的努力(即“烟草21岁”或T21政策)。由于关于T21政策的数据有限,本研究调查了佛罗里达州一项此类禁令在政策实施前后青少年中电子烟使用的流行情况以及他们对电子烟的看法。
本研究对2014年和2015年佛罗里达青少年烟草调查的回复进行了二次分析,该调查收集了横断面数据。
与2014年春季的数据相比,2014年7月1日颁布的最低年龄政策并未使佛罗里达州高中和初中学生的电子烟使用率显著下降(2014年为14.9%,2015年为25.8%),以及当前电子烟使用率(2014年为7.5%,2015年为12.4%)。学生们对电子烟危害的看法存在一些模糊性——2015年更多学生认为电子烟与香烟危害相当(11.0%对7.7%)或危害更小(32.4%对28%)。对这个问题答案不确定的学生比例有所下降(51.5%对59.2%)。
仅靠政策改变可能无法有效扭转初高中学生使用电子烟的趋势。尽管学生们可能了解电子烟的一些影响,但他们中的许多人仍然没有意识到其危害。学校和社区的干预措施应旨在提高这种认识。