Popal Sadaf, Hall Stephen, Padela Aasim I
Touro College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York, USA.
Initiative on Islam and Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Avicenna J Med. 2021 Apr 19;11(2):63-69. doi: 10.4103/ajm.ajm_51_20. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.
Biotechnology has introduced a new physiological state, "brain death," that continues to attract controversy and confusion. While variability in diagnostic criteria for, and physician practices regarding, "brain death" has been studied, few studies examine physicians' normative views on the significance of "brain death" and how religiosity implicates these views.
The objective is to assess how Muslim physicians' views on death, and how their religiosity and acculturation, associate with their perceptions of "brain death."
A randomized national sample of 626 American Muslim physicians completed a mailed questionnaire assessing sociodemographic characteristics, religiosity, and views about death. Measures of religious practice and acculturation were analyzed as predictors of physician views at the bivariate and multivariable levels. In conducting the multivariate analysis, -values less than 0.05 were deemed statistically significant.
Two-hundred and fifty-five respondents completed the survey (41% response rate). Most participants agreed that death is the irreversible cessation of cardiac and respiratory function (90%), while half agreed or disagreed with other definitions of death, such as loss of personhood or the equivalence of cardiopulmonary and neurological criteria for death. Physicians who scored higher on the religious practice scale had significantly lower odds of agreeing with the statement; "brain death" signifies the departure of the soul from the body [odds ratio (OR) = 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.33-0.98]. Those who were born in the US, or immigrated to the US as a child, had greater odds of viewing death as the irreversible loss of personhood and consciousness [OR = 3.52, 95% CI: 1.62-7.63].
Physician characteristics such as religiosity and acculturation appear to influence their views on what constitutes death and how it should be diagnosed. In our sample of Muslim physicians, there appears to be significant reservation toward equating neurological and cardiopulmonary criteria to determine death and disquiet regarding the meaning of "brain death" in general.
生物技术引入了一种新的生理状态,即“脑死亡”,这一概念仍不断引发争议和困惑。虽然已经对“脑死亡”的诊断标准以及医生的相关实践差异进行了研究,但很少有研究考察医生对“脑死亡”意义的规范性观点,以及宗教信仰如何影响这些观点。
评估穆斯林医生对死亡的看法,以及他们的宗教信仰和文化适应程度如何与他们对“脑死亡”的认知相关联。
对626名美国穆斯林医生进行随机抽样,通过邮寄问卷的方式评估他们的社会人口学特征、宗教信仰以及对死亡的看法。在双变量和多变量层面,将宗教实践和文化适应程度的测量指标作为医生观点的预测因素进行分析。在进行多变量分析时,p值小于0.05被视为具有统计学意义。
255名受访者完成了调查(回复率为41%)。大多数参与者同意死亡是心脏和呼吸功能的不可逆停止(90%),而对于其他死亡定义,如人格丧失或心肺与神经学死亡标准的等同性,约一半的人表示同意或不同意。在宗教实践量表上得分较高的医生同意“脑死亡意味着灵魂离开身体”这一说法的几率显著较低[比值比(OR)=0.57,95%置信区间(CI):0.33 - 0.98]。那些在美国出生或幼年移民到美国的人,将死亡视为人格和意识不可逆丧失的几率更高[OR = 3.52,95% CI:1.62 - 7.63]。
宗教信仰和文化适应程度等医生特征似乎会影响他们对死亡构成以及应如何诊断死亡的看法。在我们的穆斯林医生样本中,对于将神经学和心肺学标准等同起来确定死亡存在显著保留意见,总体上对“脑死亡”的含义也感到不安。