• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纽约五个奶牛场五种垫料材料的特性及其与散装罐牛奶质量的关系

Description of the Characteristics of Five Bedding Materials and Association With Bulk Tank Milk Quality on Five New York Dairy Herds.

作者信息

Alanis Valeria M, Zurakowski Michael, Pawloski Deb, Tomazi Tiago, Nydam Daryl V, Ospina Paula A

机构信息

Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.

Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Cobleskill, NY, United States.

出版信息

Front Vet Sci. 2021 Apr 30;8:636833. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.636833. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fvets.2021.636833
PMID:33996966
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8119788/
Abstract

Environmental mastitis represents a major challenge on dairy farms where contagious pathogens are controlled by improved milking procedures. Therefore, research focused on the environment is important to improve udder health programs. The objectives of this prospective and descriptive study were to (1) describe bedding bacterial counts, pH, and dry matter (DM) of five different bedding types (organic: manure solids, straw, paper fiber; inorganic: sand, recycled sand) and (2) explore the association between bedding bacterial counts with bulk tank milk quality. This study took place within five conveniently selected commercial dairy herds, each with a predominant bedding material in lactating pens. Bedding samples (used = 237; fresh = 53) were collected monthly from July 2018 to July 2019 following a standard operating procedure (SOP) to minimize sampling variability. Additionally, a bulk tank (BT) milk sample ( = 40) was collected on the same day unless milk had been picked up prior to arrival. Both BT and bedding samples were submitted to the laboratory for culture and bacterial identification and quantification of spp, coliforms, and non-coliforms as well as detection of several pathogens of mastitis importance. Somatic cell count was evaluated in BT samples. Within bedding type, the correlation between bedding characteristics and bacterial counts in bedding was evaluated using Pearson correlation. Within bedding type, the correlation between bacterial counts in bedding samples and bacterial counts in BT were determined. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to evaluate the bacterial count by bedding type and to evaluate BT somatic cell count differences based on bedding type. In fresh bedding, bacterial counts were generally higher for manure solids for all bacterial groups compared with other materials. In used samples, organic materials had the highest levels of all bacterial groups. The proportion of samples with detectable organisms of mastitis importance varied within and among herds in both bedding and BT samples throughout the study period. In bedding samples, a higher DM content had the lowest levels of bacterial growth compared with those with lower DM content. Most bedding samples were on the alkaline side within a pH range of 8-11. No relationship between bacterial counts and pH was observed. No associations between BT bacteria counts and bedding bacterial counts were observed. No association between bulk tank somatic cell counts based on bedding type were observed. Despite using an SOP for bedding sampling in an effort to consistently collect samples, we still observed a large amount of variability both within and among bedding samples. This variability may have obscured any potential association between BT milk quality and bedding type.

摘要

环境性乳腺炎是奶牛场面临的一项重大挑战,在这些奶牛场中,传染性病原体通过改进挤奶程序来控制。因此,针对环境的研究对于改善乳房健康计划很重要。这项前瞻性描述性研究的目的是:(1)描述五种不同垫料类型(有机垫料:粪便固体、稻草、纸纤维;无机垫料:沙子、再生沙)的垫料细菌计数、pH值和干物质(DM);(2)探讨垫料细菌计数与奶罐牛奶质量之间的关联。本研究在五个方便选取的商业奶牛群中进行,每个牛群在泌乳栏中都有一种主要的垫料材料。从2018年7月至2019年7月,按照标准操作程序(SOP)每月采集垫料样本(使用过的 = 237份;新鲜的 = 53份),以尽量减少采样变异性。此外,除非在到达之前牛奶已被取走,否则在同一天采集奶罐(BT)牛奶样本( = 40份)。BT样本和垫料样本都提交到实验室进行培养、细菌鉴定以及对葡萄球菌属、大肠菌群和非大肠菌群进行定量,同时检测几种对乳腺炎有重要影响的病原体。在BT样本中评估体细胞计数。在垫料类型内,使用Pearson相关性评估垫料特征与垫料中细菌计数之间的相关性。在垫料类型内,确定垫料样本中的细菌计数与BT中的细菌计数之间的相关性。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验按垫料类型评估细菌计数,并基于垫料类型评估BT体细胞计数差异。在新鲜垫料中,与其他材料相比,粪便固体中所有细菌组的细菌计数通常更高。在使用过的样本中,有机材料中所有细菌组的含量最高。在整个研究期间,在垫料和BT样本中,具有重要乳腺炎意义的可检测生物体的样本比例在牛群内部和牛群之间有所不同。在垫料样本中,与DM含量较低的样本相比,DM含量较高的样本细菌生长水平最低。大多数垫料样本的pH值在8 - 11范围内,呈碱性。未观察到细菌计数与pH值之间的关系。未观察到BT细菌计数与垫料细菌计数之间的关联。未观察到基于垫料类型的奶罐体细胞计数之间的关联。尽管为了持续采集样本而对垫料采样使用了SOP,但我们仍然观察到垫料样本内部和之间存在大量变异性。这种变异性可能掩盖了BT牛奶质量与垫料类型之间的任何潜在关联。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/8119788/f55254b1a041/fvets-08-636833-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/8119788/41a9c4eed6cd/fvets-08-636833-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/8119788/6f5bd311d98b/fvets-08-636833-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/8119788/e418b8302448/fvets-08-636833-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/8119788/63ae911c77b9/fvets-08-636833-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/8119788/6e024c2e0247/fvets-08-636833-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/8119788/e3178a41eaa3/fvets-08-636833-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/8119788/b8d8100f8a8b/fvets-08-636833-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/8119788/318d895ff6c1/fvets-08-636833-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/8119788/f55254b1a041/fvets-08-636833-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/8119788/41a9c4eed6cd/fvets-08-636833-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/8119788/6f5bd311d98b/fvets-08-636833-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/8119788/e418b8302448/fvets-08-636833-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/8119788/63ae911c77b9/fvets-08-636833-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/8119788/6e024c2e0247/fvets-08-636833-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/8119788/e3178a41eaa3/fvets-08-636833-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/8119788/b8d8100f8a8b/fvets-08-636833-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/8119788/318d895ff6c1/fvets-08-636833-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/8119788/f55254b1a041/fvets-08-636833-g0009.jpg

相似文献

1
Description of the Characteristics of Five Bedding Materials and Association With Bulk Tank Milk Quality on Five New York Dairy Herds.纽约五个奶牛场五种垫料材料的特性及其与散装罐牛奶质量的关系
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Apr 30;8:636833. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.636833. eCollection 2021.
2
Relationships among bedding materials, bedding bacteria counts, udder hygiene, milk quality, and udder health in US dairy herds.美国奶牛场中垫料、垫料细菌数量、乳房卫生、牛奶质量和乳房健康之间的关系。
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Nov;102(11):10213-10234. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16692. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
3
Bacterial concentrations in bedding and their association with dairy cow hygiene and milk quality.床上用品中的细菌浓度及其与奶牛卫生和牛奶质量的关系。
Animal. 2020 May;14(5):1052-1066. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119002787. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
4
Cross-sectional study of the relationships among bedding materials, bedding bacteria counts, and intramammary infection in late-lactation dairy cows.奶牛产后晚期卧床垫料、垫料细菌数量与乳房内感染的横断面研究。
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Dec;102(12):11384-11400. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17074. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
5
Comparisons of recycled manure solids and wood shavings/sawdust as bedding material-Implications for animal welfare, herd health, milk quality, and bedding costs in Swedish dairy herds.再生粪肥固体与木屑/锯末作为垫料的比较-对瑞典奶牛场动物福利、畜群健康、牛奶质量和垫料成本的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2024 Aug;107(8):5779-5793. doi: 10.3168/jds.2023-24192. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
6
Bacterial counts on teat skin and in new sand, recycled sand, and recycled manure solids used as bedding in freestalls.奶牛舍卧床使用的新沙子、回收沙子和回收粪便固体以及乳头皮肤上的细菌计数。
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Aug;99(8):6594-6608. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10674. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
7
The impact of dairy cows' bedding material and its microbial content on the quality and safety of milk - A cross sectional study of UK farms.奶牛垫料及其微生物含量对牛奶质量和安全的影响——英国农场的横断面研究。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2018 Mar 23;269:36-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.12.022. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
8
Guidelines for monitoring bulk tank milk somatic cell and bacterial counts.大容量储奶罐牛奶体细胞和细菌计数监测指南。
J Dairy Sci. 2004 Oct;87(10):3561-73. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73493-1.
9
Association of bedding types with management practices and indicators of milk quality on larger Wisconsin dairy farms.威斯康星州大型奶牛场垫料类型与管理实践及牛奶质量指标的关联
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Nov;98(11):7865-85. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9866. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
10
Milking time hygiene interventions on dairy farms reduce spore counts in raw milk.奶牛场挤奶时间卫生干预可降低生奶中的孢子计数。
J Dairy Sci. 2020 May;103(5):4088-4099. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17499. Epub 2020 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of lime-based conditioner against environmental udder pathogens in different bedding materials.基于石灰的调理剂对不同垫料中环境性乳房病原体的功效。
Vet Anim Sci. 2025 May 1;28:100459. doi: 10.1016/j.vas.2025.100459. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
A multi-strain, biofilm-forming cocktail of spp. and spp. alters the microbial composition on polyethylene calf housing surfaces.一种由[具体菌种1]和[具体菌种2]组成的多菌株生物膜形成混合菌液改变了聚乙烯犊牛饲养舍表面的微生物组成。
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Jul;13(7):e0330224. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03302-24. Epub 2025 May 28.
3
Impact of sample refrigeration and freezing on the bacteriological counts of different bedding materials for dairy cows.

本文引用的文献

1
Bacterial concentrations in bedding and their association with dairy cow hygiene and milk quality.床上用品中的细菌浓度及其与奶牛卫生和牛奶质量的关系。
Animal. 2020 May;14(5):1052-1066. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119002787. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
2
Cross-sectional study of the relationships among bedding materials, bedding bacteria counts, and intramammary infection in late-lactation dairy cows.奶牛产后晚期卧床垫料、垫料细菌数量与乳房内感染的横断面研究。
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Dec;102(12):11384-11400. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17074. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
3
Relationships among bedding materials, bedding bacteria counts, udder hygiene, milk quality, and udder health in US dairy herds.
样品冷藏和冷冻对不同奶牛垫料细菌计数的影响。
BMC Vet Res. 2024 Sep 12;20(1):410. doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-04247-w.
4
Effect of a lime-based bedding conditioner on physical-chemical characteristics and microbiological counts of recycled manure solids.基于石灰的垫料调节剂对再生粪便固体理化特性和微生物计数的影响。
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Jul 15;11:1408798. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1408798. eCollection 2024.
5
Conditioner application improves bedding quality and bacterial composition with potential beneficial impacts for dairy cow's health.使用护发素可改善卧床环境质量和细菌组成,对奶牛健康具有潜在的有益影响。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Apr 2;12(4):e0426323. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04263-23. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
6
Elucidation of the Bovine Intramammary Bacteriome and Resistome from healthy cows of Swiss dairy farms in the Canton Tessin.对提契诺州瑞士奶牛场健康奶牛的牛乳房细菌群落和耐药基因组的解析。
Front Microbiol. 2023 Jul 31;14:1183018. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1183018. eCollection 2023.
7
Evaluation of Suitability of New Bedding Material Obtained after Straw Biogasification for Dairy Cows.秸秆厌氧发酵后获得的新型奶牛垫料材料适用性评估
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jun 7;13(12):1905. doi: 10.3390/ani13121905.
美国奶牛场中垫料、垫料细菌数量、乳房卫生、牛奶质量和乳房健康之间的关系。
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Nov;102(11):10213-10234. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16692. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
4
Bedding and bedding management practices are associated with mesophilic and thermophilic spore levels in bulk tank raw milk.床具和床上用品管理措施与散装原料奶中嗜温及嗜热孢子水平有关。
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Aug;102(8):6885-6900. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-16022. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
5
Pathogen-specific production losses in bovine mastitis.牛乳腺炎中的病原体特异性生产损失。
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Oct;101(10):9493-9504. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-14824. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
6
The impact of dairy cows' bedding material and its microbial content on the quality and safety of milk - A cross sectional study of UK farms.奶牛垫料及其微生物含量对牛奶质量和安全的影响——英国农场的横断面研究。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2018 Mar 23;269:36-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.12.022. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
7
A 100-Year Review: Mastitis detection, management, and prevention.一百年回顾:乳腺炎的检测、管理和预防。
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Dec;100(12):10381-10397. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13023.
8
Effects of alternative deep bedding options on dairy cow preference, lying behavior, cleanliness, and teat end contamination.替代深垫料方案对奶牛偏好、躺卧行为、清洁度和乳头末端污染的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Jan;101(1):530-536. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-12358. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
9
Anatomical characteristics of teats and premilking bacterial counts of teat skin swabs of primiparous cows exposed to different types of bedding.不同垫料类型对初产奶牛乳头解剖特征及乳头皮肤拭子挤奶前细菌计数的影响
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Feb;100(2):1436-1444. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11514. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
10
Associations of selected bedding types with incidence rates of subclinical and clinical mastitis in primiparous Holstein dairy cows.初产荷斯坦奶牛中选定垫料类型与亚临床和临床乳腺炎发病率的关联。
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Jun;99(6):4707-4717. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10675. Epub 2016 Apr 6.