• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非法毒品市场对国家休闲大麻法律的反应。

Illegal drug market responses to state recreational cannabis laws.

机构信息

Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA.

Department of Business Administration, Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM), Mexico City, Mexico.

出版信息

Addiction. 2021 Dec;116(12):3433-3443. doi: 10.1111/add.15517. Epub 2021 May 17.

DOI:10.1111/add.15517
PMID:33998087
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8578142/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In the United States, 15 states and the District of Columbia have implemented recreational cannabis laws (RCLs) legalizing recreational cannabis use. We aimed to estimate the association between RCLs and street prices, potency, quality and law enforcement seizures of illegal cannabis, methamphetamine, cocaine, heroin, oxycodone, hydrocodone, morphine, amphetamine and alprazolam.

DESIGN

We pooled crowdsourced data from 2010-19 Price of Weed and 2010-19 StreetRx, and administrative data from the 2006-19 System to Retrieve Information from Drug Evidence (STRIDE) and the 2007-19 National Forensic Laboratory Information System (NFLIS). We employed a difference-in-differences design that exploited the staggered implementation of RCLs to compare changes in outcomes between RCL and non-RCL states.

SETTING AND CASES

Eleven RCL and 40 non-RCL US states.

MEASURES

The primary outcome was the natural log of prices per gram, overall and by self-reported quality. The primary policy was an indicator of RCL implementation, defined using effective dates.

FINDINGS

The street price of cannabis decreased by 9.2% [β = -0.092; 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.15-, -0.03] in RCL states after RCL implementation, with largest declines among low-quality purchases (β = -0.195; 95% CI = -0.282, -0.108). Price declines were accompanied by a 93% (β = -0.93; 95% CI = -1.51, -0.36) reduction in law enforcement seizures of cannabis in RCL states. Among illegal opioids, including heroin, oxycodone and hydrocodone, street prices increased and law enforcement seizures decreased in RCL states.

CONCLUSIONS

Recreational cannabis laws in US states appear to be associated with illegal drug market responses in those states, including reductions in the street price of cannabis. Changes in the street prices of illegal opioids analyzed may suggest that in states with recreational cannabis laws the markets for other illegal drugs are not independent of legal cannabis market regulation.

摘要

背景和目的

在美国,有 15 个州和哥伦比亚特区已经实施了娱乐用大麻合法化法律(RCL)。我们旨在评估 RCL 与街头价格、效力、质量以及非法大麻、冰毒、可卡因、海洛因、羟考酮、氢可酮、吗啡、安非他命和阿普唑仑的执法缉获量之间的关联。

设计

我们从 2010-19 年的“大麻价格”(Price of Weed)和 2010-19 年的“街头 Rx”(StreetRx)中汇集了众包数据,以及从 2006-19 年的“从毒品证据中检索信息系统”(System to Retrieve Information from Drug Evidence,STRIDE)和 2007-19 年的“国家法医实验室信息系统”(National Forensic Laboratory Information System,NFLIS)中获取的行政数据。我们采用了差异中的差异设计,利用 RCL 的交错实施来比较 RCL 州和非 RCL 州之间结果的变化。

设置和案例

11 个 RCL 州和 40 个非 RCL 州。

措施

主要结果是每克价格的自然对数,总体和按自我报告的质量。主要政策是 RCL 实施的指标,使用生效日期来定义。

发现

在 RCL 实施后,RCL 州的大麻街头价格下降了 9.2%(β=-0.092;95%置信区间[CI]:-0.15,-0.03),其中低质量购买的降幅最大(β=-0.195;95%CI:-0.282,-0.108)。价格下降伴随着 RCL 州执法部门对大麻缉获量减少了 93%(β=-0.93;95%CI:-1.51,-0.36)。在包括海洛因、羟考酮和氢可酮在内的非法阿片类药物中,RCL 州的街头价格上涨,执法缉获量下降。

结论

美国各州的娱乐用大麻法似乎与这些州的非法毒品市场反应有关,包括大麻街头价格的降低。分析的非法阿片类药物的街头价格变化可能表明,在有娱乐用大麻法的州,其他非法药物的市场与合法大麻市场的监管并非相互独立。

相似文献

1
Illegal drug market responses to state recreational cannabis laws.非法毒品市场对国家休闲大麻法律的反应。
Addiction. 2021 Dec;116(12):3433-3443. doi: 10.1111/add.15517. Epub 2021 May 17.
2
Recreational cannabis legalization and immigration enforcement: a state-level analysis of arrests and deportations in the United States, 2009-2020.娱乐用大麻合法化与移民执法:2009-2020 年美国逮捕和递解出境的州级分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 1;24(1):936. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18334-y.
3
Association of Recreational Cannabis Laws in Colorado and Washington State With Changes in Traffic Fatalities, 2005-2017.科罗拉多州和华盛顿州休闲大麻法律与 2005-2017 年交通死亡人数变化的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Aug 1;180(8):1061-1068. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1757.
4
Crowdsourcing black market prices for prescription opioids.众包获取处方阿片类药物的黑市价格。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 16;15(8):e178. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2810.
5
Risks, prices, and positions: A social network analysis of illegal drug trafficking in the world-economy.风险、价格与地位:世界经济中非法毒品贩运的社会网络分析。
Int J Drug Policy. 2014 Mar;25(2):235-43. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.12.004. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
6
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Cannabis Use Following Legalization in US States With Medical Cannabis Laws.美国有医用大麻法律的州大麻合法化后,种族和民族之间在大麻使用方面的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2127002. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.27002.
7
State Cannabis Legalization and Cannabis Use Disorder in the US Veterans Health Administration, 2005 to 2019.2005 年至 2019 年美国退伍军人事务部的州级大麻合法化与大麻使用障碍。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 1;80(4):380-388. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.0019.
8
Chronic Pain, Cannabis Legalization and Cannabis Use Disorder in Veterans Health Administration Patients, 2005 to 2019.2005年至2019年退伍军人健康管理局患者中的慢性疼痛、大麻合法化与大麻使用障碍
medRxiv. 2023 Jul 12:2023.07.10.23292453. doi: 10.1101/2023.07.10.23292453.
9
Recreational cannabis legalization and transitions in cannabis use: findings from a nationally representative longitudinal cohort in the United States.娱乐用大麻合法化与大麻使用转变:来自美国全国代表性纵向队列的研究结果。
Addiction. 2022 Oct;117(10):2651-2659. doi: 10.1111/add.15895. Epub 2022 May 26.
10
Association of Cannabis Legalization with Cannabis Positive Drug Screening in US Veterans.美国退伍军人中大麻合法化与大麻阳性药物筛查的关联
medRxiv. 2023 Dec 9:2023.12.08.23299731. doi: 10.1101/2023.12.08.23299731.

引用本文的文献

1
Post-legalization shifts in cannabis use among young adults in Georgia-A nationally representative study.佐治亚州年轻人在大麻合法化后的使用变化——一项全国代表性研究
Addiction. 2025 Feb;120(2):335-346. doi: 10.1111/add.16688. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
2
Germany's cannabis act: a catalyst for European drug policy reform?德国的大麻法案:欧洲毒品政策改革的催化剂?
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 May 14;42:100929. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100929. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Interpol Review of Drug Analysis 2019-2022.国际刑警组织2019 - 2022年毒品分析综述

本文引用的文献

1
Is Cannabis being used as a substitute for non-medical opioids by adults with problem substance use in the United States? A within-person analysis.在美国,有问题物质使用史的成年人是否将大麻用作非医疗用阿片类药物的替代品?一项个体内分析。
Addiction. 2021 May;116(5):1113-1121. doi: 10.1111/add.15228. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
2
Association Between Recreational Marijuana Legalization in the United States and Changes in Marijuana Use and Cannabis Use Disorder From 2008 to 2016.美国休闲大麻合法化与 2008 年至 2016 年期间大麻使用和大麻使用障碍变化的关联。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 1;77(2):165-171. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.3254.
3
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2023 Jan 5;6:100299. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100299. eCollection 2023.
4
The kids aren't alright: The effects of medical marijuana market size on adolescents.孩子们不太好:医用大麻市场规模对青少年的影响。
J Health Econ. 2023 Jan;87:102700. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2022.102700. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
5
Prenatal substance use policies and newborn health.产前物质使用政策与新生儿健康。
Health Econ. 2022 Jul;31(7):1452-1467. doi: 10.1002/hec.4518. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
6
Marijuana liberalization policies and perinatal health.大麻合法化政策与围产期健康。
J Health Econ. 2021 Dec;80:102537. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102537. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
Price and product variation in Washington's recreational cannabis market.
华盛顿娱乐大麻市场的价格和产品变化。
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 May;91:102547. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
4
Association between medical cannabis laws and opioid overdose mortality has reversed over time.医疗大麻法律与阿片类药物过量死亡率之间的关联随时间发生了逆转。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jun 25;116(26):12624-12626. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1903434116. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
5
Medical marijuana laws are associated with increases in substance use treatment admissions by pregnant women.医用大麻合法化与孕妇接受物质使用治疗的人数增加有关。
Addiction. 2019 Sep;114(9):1593-1601. doi: 10.1111/add.14661. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
6
Association Between US State Medical Cannabis Laws and Opioid Prescribing in the Medicare Part D Population.美国州医疗大麻法律与医疗保险处方中阿片类药物开方之间的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 May 1;178(5):667-672. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0266.
7
Association of Medical and Adult-Use Marijuana Laws With Opioid Prescribing for Medicaid Enrollees.医疗用大麻和成人使用大麻法律与医疗补助计划参保者开阿片类药物处方的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 May 1;178(5):673-679. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.1007.
8
Do medical marijuana laws reduce addictions and deaths related to pain killers?医用大麻合法化是否能减少与止痛药相关的成瘾和死亡?
J Health Econ. 2018 Mar;58:29-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.12.007. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
9
Trends and age, period and cohort effects for marijuana use prevalence in the 1984-2015 US National Alcohol Surveys.1984-2015 年美国国家酒精调查中大麻使用流行率的趋势及年龄、时期和队列效应。
Addiction. 2018 Mar;113(3):473-481. doi: 10.1111/add.14031. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
10
Loose regulation of medical marijuana programs associated with higher rates of adult marijuana use but not cannabis use disorder.对医用大麻项目的宽松监管与成年人更高的大麻使用率相关,但与大麻使用障碍无关。
Addiction. 2017 Nov;112(11):1985-1991. doi: 10.1111/add.13904. Epub 2017 Jul 17.