Center for Individualized and Genomic Medicine Research (CIGMA) (H.G., J. Luzum, T.D.B., K.W., D.E.L.), Henry Ford Hospital.
Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit (R.S., J. Li).
Circ Genom Precis Med. 2021 Jun;14(3):e003140. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.120.003140. Epub 2021 May 17.
It remains unclear whether the plasma proteome adds value to established predictors in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We sought to derive and validate a plasma proteomic risk score (PRS) for survival in patients with HFrEF (HFrEF-PRS).
Patients meeting Framingham criteria for HF with EF<50% were enrolled (N=1017) and plasma underwent SOMAscan profiling (4453 targets). Patients were randomly divided 2:1 into derivation and validation cohorts. The HFrEF-PRS was derived using Cox regression of all-cause mortality adjusted for clinical score and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide), then was tested in the validation cohort. Risk stratification improvement was evaluated by C statistic, integrated discrimination index, continuous net reclassification index, and median improvement in risk score for 1-year and 3-year mortality.
Participants' mean age was 68 years, 48% identified as Black, 35% were female, and 296 deaths occurred. In derivation (n=681), 128 proteins associated with mortality, 8 comprising the optimized HFrEF-PRS. In validation (n=336) the HFrEF-PRS associated with mortality (hazard ratio, 2.27 [95% CI, 1.84-2.82], =6.3×10), Kaplan-Meier curves differed significantly between HFrEF-PRS quartiles (=2.2×10), and it remained significant after adjustment for clinical score and NT-proBNP (hazard ratio, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.05-1.79], =0.021). The HFrEF-PRS improved metrics of risk stratification (C statistic change, 0.009, =0.612; integrated discrimination index, 0.041, =0.010; net reclassification index=0.391, =0.078; median improvement in risk score=0.039, =0.016) and associated with cardiovascular death and HF phenotypes (eg, 6-minute walk distance, EF change). Most HFrEF-PRS proteins had little known connection to HFrEF.
A plasma multiprotein score improved risk stratification in patients with HFrEF and identified novel candidates.
目前尚不清楚血浆蛋白质组是否能为射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)的既定预测因子提供附加价值。我们试图为 HFrEF 患者(HFrEF-PRS)的生存推导和验证一个血浆蛋白质组风险评分(PRS)。
符合弗雷明汉心力衰竭 EF<50%标准的患者被纳入(N=1017),并对其进行 SOMAscan 分析(4453 个靶点)。患者被随机分为 2:1 的推导和验证队列。使用全因死亡率的 Cox 回归对所有临床评分和 NT-proBNP(N 末端 pro-B 型利钠肽)进行调整,推导 HFrEF-PRS,然后在验证队列中进行测试。通过 C 统计量、综合鉴别指数、连续净重新分类指数和 1 年和 3 年死亡率的风险评分中位数改善来评估风险分层改善。
参与者的平均年龄为 68 岁,48%为黑人,35%为女性,296 人死亡。在推导队列(n=681)中,有 128 种与死亡率相关的蛋白质,其中 8 种构成了优化的 HFrEF-PRS。在验证队列(n=336)中,HFrEF-PRS 与死亡率相关(风险比,2.27 [95%CI,1.84-2.82],=6.3×10),HFrEF-PRS 四分位数的 Kaplan-Meier 曲线差异有统计学意义(=2.2×10),并且在调整临床评分和 NT-proBNP 后仍然显著(风险比,1.37 [95%CI,1.05-1.79],=0.021)。HFrEF-PRS 改善了风险分层的指标(C 统计量变化,0.009,=0.612;综合鉴别指数,0.041,=0.010;净重新分类指数=0.391,=0.078;风险评分中位数改善=0.039,=0.016),并与心血管死亡和心力衰竭表型相关(例如,6 分钟步行距离,EF 变化)。大多数 HFrEF-PRS 蛋白与 HFrEF 几乎没有已知的联系。
一种血浆多蛋白评分提高了 HFrEF 患者的风险分层,并确定了新的候选者。