Department of Psychology, West University of Timișoara, Timișoara, Romania.
Teacher Training Department, West University of Timișoara, Timișoara, Romania.
PLoS One. 2021 May 17;16(5):e0250125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250125. eCollection 2021.
We analyzed prosocial behaviors in a field experiment (N = 307) conducted in an urban context (Timisoara, Banat region, Romania), starting from a classical Cross-Cultural Psychology research organized in UK and Iran by Collet & O'Shea in 1976. If the evoked study is focused on comparing prosocial behaviors in two very different national cultures (UK vs. Iran), we compared helping strangers strategies within the same national culture in relation to the regional identities of the help-seeking subjects. A behavioral scenario was created by asking naïve participants to offer support and give directions to a place even if they did not know its whereabouts. Drawing on social identity theory, it was tested whether regional belonging of the help-seeker (in-group vs. out-group) predicts the availability of help-givers for offering help, their availability for giving wrong directions, as well as their emotional expressiveness. Results are interpreted within the perspective of social distance between groups and show that the more distant regional identities are perceived to be, the less generous help-givers are, both in terms of their decision to help and to give wrong directions, as well as in their expressed emotions.
我们在一个城市背景下(罗马尼亚的蒂米什瓦拉,巴纳特地区)进行了一项田野实验(N=307),对亲社会行为进行了分析,该实验源自 1976 年科莱特和奥谢在英国和伊朗组织的一项经典跨文化心理学研究。如果被唤起的研究集中于比较两种截然不同的民族文化(英国与伊朗)中的亲社会行为,那么我们就在同一民族文化中,根据求助者的地区身份,比较帮助陌生人的策略。通过要求天真的参与者提供支持并为一个地方指路,即使他们不知道该地方的位置,从而创建了一个行为场景。借鉴社会认同理论,我们测试了求助者的地区归属(内群体与外群体)是否可以预测帮助者提供帮助的意愿、提供错误方向的意愿以及他们的情绪表达能力。结果是从群体之间的社会距离的角度来解释的,结果表明,地区身份被认为越遥远,帮助者就越吝啬,无论是在他们帮助和提供错误方向的决定方面,还是在他们表达的情感方面。