• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骶骨肿瘤切除术:大容量综合性癌症中心的围手术期结果。

Sacrectomy for sacral tumors: perioperative outcomes in a large-volume comprehensive cancer center.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905 USA.

出版信息

Spine J. 2021 Nov;21(11):1908-1919. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.05.004. Epub 2021 May 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2021.05.004
PMID:34000375
Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Sacral tumors are incredibly rare lesions affecting fewer than one in every 10,000 persons. Reported perioperative morbidity rates range widely, varying from 30% to 70%, due to the relatively low volumes seen by most centers. Factors affecting perioperative outcome following sacrectomy remain ill-defined.

PURPOSE

To characterize perioperative outcomes of sacral tumor patients undergoing sacrectomy and identify independent risk factors of perioperative morbidity STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study at a single comprehensive cancer center PATIENT SAMPLE: Consecutively treated sacral tumor patients (primary or metastatic) undergoing sacrectomy for oncologic resection between April 2013 and April 2020 OUTCOME MEASURES: Perioperative complications, hospital length of stay, non-home discharge, 30-day readmission, and 30-day reoperation METHODS: Details were gathered about tumor pathology and morphology, surgery performed, baseline medical comorbidities, preoperative lab data, and patient demographics. Stepwise multivariable regressions were conducted to identify independent risk factors of perioperative outcomes while evaluating predictive accuracy.

RESULTS

57 sacral tumor patients were included (mean age 55.5±13.0 years; 60% female). The complication, non-home discharge, 30-day readmission, and 30-day reoperation rates were 39%, 56%, 16%, and 14%, respectively. Independent predictors of perioperative complications included ASA>2 (OR=10.7; 95%CI [1.3, 86.0]; p=0.026), radicular pain (OR=10.9; p=0.014), platelet count (OR=0.989 per 10³/μL; p=0.049), and instrumentation (OR=10.7; p=0.009). Independent predictors of length of stay included iliac vessel involvement (β=15.8; p=0.005), larger tumor volume (β=0.027 per cm³; p<0.001), a staged procedure (β=10.0; p=0.018), and S1 nerve root sacrifice (OR=15.8; p=.011). The optimal model predictive of non-home discharge included bilateral S3-S5 or higher nerve root sacrifice (OR=3.9; p=0.054), instrumentation (OR=8.6; p=0.005), and vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap closure (OR=5.3; p=0.067). 30-day readmission was independently predicted by history of chronic kidney disease (OR=26.7; p=0.021), radicular pain (OR=8.1; p=0.039), and preoperative saddle anesthesia (OR=12.6; p=0.026). All multivariable models achieved good discrimination (AUC>0.8 and R>0.7).

CONCLUSION

Clinical and operative factors were important predictors of complications and 30-day readmission, while tumor-related and operative factors accounted for most of the variability in length of stay and non-home discharge.

摘要

背景语境

骶骨肿瘤是一种罕见的病变,发病率低于每 10000 人中的 1 人。由于大多数中心的病例数量相对较少,报告的围手术期发病率差异很大,从 30%到 70%不等。影响骶骨切除术后围手术期结果的因素仍未明确。

目的

描述接受骶骨肿瘤切除术的骶骨肿瘤患者的围手术期结果,并确定围手术期发病率的独立危险因素。

研究设计/设置:单中心综合癌症中心的回顾性队列研究

患者样本

2013 年 4 月至 2020 年 4 月期间接受骶骨肿瘤切除术以进行肿瘤切除的连续治疗的骶骨肿瘤患者(原发性或转移性)

结局指标

围手术期并发症、住院时间、非居家出院、30 天内再入院和 30 天内再次手术

方法

收集了肿瘤病理和形态、手术方式、基线合并症、术前实验室数据和患者人口统计学数据的详细信息。进行逐步多变量回归以确定围手术期结果的独立危险因素,同时评估预测准确性。

结果

共纳入 57 例骶骨肿瘤患者(平均年龄 55.5±13.0 岁;60%为女性)。并发症、非居家出院、30 天内再入院和 30 天内再次手术的发生率分别为 39%、56%、16%和 14%。围手术期并发症的独立预测因素包括 ASA>2(OR=10.7;95%CI [1.3, 86.0];p=0.026)、神经根痛(OR=10.9;p=0.014)、血小板计数(OR=每 10³/μL 增加 0.989;p=0.049)和器械使用(OR=10.7;p=0.009)。住院时间的独立预测因素包括髂血管受累(β=15.8;p=0.005)、更大的肿瘤体积(β=每立方厘米增加 0.027;p<0.001)、分期手术(β=10.0;p=0.018)和 S1 神经根牺牲(OR=15.8;p=0.011)。非居家出院的最佳预测模型包括双侧 S3-S5 或更高水平的神经根牺牲(OR=3.9;p=0.054)、器械使用(OR=8.6;p=0.005)和垂直腹直肌肌皮瓣闭合(OR=5.3;p=0.067)。30 天内再入院的独立预测因素包括慢性肾脏病病史(OR=26.7;p=0.021)、神经根痛(OR=8.1;p=0.039)和术前鞍区麻醉(OR=12.6;p=0.026)。所有多变量模型均具有良好的区分度(AUC>0.8 和 R>0.7)。

结论

临床和手术因素是并发症和 30 天内再入院的重要预测因素,而肿瘤相关和手术因素则是住院时间和非居家出院的主要影响因素。

相似文献

1
Sacrectomy for sacral tumors: perioperative outcomes in a large-volume comprehensive cancer center.骶骨肿瘤切除术:大容量综合性癌症中心的围手术期结果。
Spine J. 2021 Nov;21(11):1908-1919. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.05.004. Epub 2021 May 14.
2
A novel online calculator to predict nonroutine discharge, length of stay, readmission, and reoperation in patients undergoing surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors.一种新型在线计算器,可预测行脊髓髓内肿瘤手术患者的非常规出院、住院时间、再入院和再手术。
Spine J. 2022 Aug;22(8):1345-1355. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.03.005. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
3
Thirty-day readmission and reoperation after surgery for spinal tumors: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis.脊柱肿瘤手术后30天再入院及再次手术:一项国家外科质量改进计划分析。
Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Aug;41(2):E5. doi: 10.3171/2016.5.FOCUS16168.
4
Drivers of Readmission and Reoperation After Surgery for Vertebral Column Metastases.脊柱转移瘤手术后再入院和再次手术的驱动因素。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Oct;154:e806-e814. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.08.015. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
5
[Surgical Treatment of Sacral Chordoma].[骶骨脊索瘤的外科治疗]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2022;89(4):300-308.
6
What Are the Conditional Survival and Functional Outcomes After Surgical Treatment of 115 Patients With Sacral Chordoma?115例骶骨脊索瘤患者接受手术治疗后的条件生存和功能结果如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Mar;475(3):620-630. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4773-8.
7
Dialysis is an independent risk factor for perioperative adverse events, readmission, reoperation, and mortality for patients undergoing elective spine surgery.透析是择期脊柱手术患者围手术期不良事件、再入院、再次手术和死亡的独立危险因素。
Spine J. 2018 Nov;18(11):2033-2042. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.04.007. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
8
Implications of surgical infection on surgical and hospital outcomes after spine surgery: A NSQIP study of 410,930 patients.脊柱手术后手术部位感染对手术和医院结局的影响:一项针对 410930 例患者的 NSQIP 研究。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Oct;245:108505. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108505. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
9
Outcome and Complications following Vertical Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap Surgery to Reconstruct Sacrectomy Defects.垂直腹直肌肌皮瓣手术重建骶骨切除术缺陷的结果和并发症。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Nov;142(5):1327-1335. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004890.
10
Impact of Multidisciplinary Intraoperative Teams on Thirty-Day Complications After Sacral Tumor Resection.多学科术中团队对骶骨肿瘤切除术后 30 天并发症的影响。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Aug;152:e558-e566. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.06.040. Epub 2021 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Partial sacrectomy with en bloc tumor resection without instrumentation. What level is safe?不使用内固定器械进行整块肿瘤切除的部分骶骨切除术。安全的切除平面是什么?
Brain Spine. 2025 Mar 27;5:104246. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104246. eCollection 2025.
2
Optimizing bone health for the prevention of revision adult spinal deformity surgery: a break-even analysis.优化骨骼健康以预防成人脊柱畸形翻修手术:一项盈亏平衡分析。
Spine Deform. 2025 Apr 11. doi: 10.1007/s43390-025-01070-7.
3
Comparison of Different Fusion Radiomics for Predicting Benign and Malignant Sacral Tumors: A Pilot Study.
不同融合影像组学预测骶骨良恶性肿瘤的比较:一项初步研究。
J Imaging Inform Med. 2024 Oct;37(5):2415-2427. doi: 10.1007/s10278-024-01134-6. Epub 2024 May 8.
4
Complication Pattern of Sacral Primary Tumor Resection: A Study on the Risk Factors of Surgical Site Infection and Bowel or Bladder Dysfunction and Their Associations with Length of Hospital Stay.骶骨原发性肿瘤切除术的并发症模式:关于手术部位感染、肠道或膀胱功能障碍的危险因素及其与住院时间的关联的研究
Asian Spine J. 2023 Oct;17(5):851-861. doi: 10.31616/asj.2022.0404. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
5
A Novel Construct to Treat Destructive Osteomyelitis of the Lumbar Spine in a Patient With Pre-existing Paraplegia.一种用于治疗一名已有截瘫患者的腰椎破坏性骨髓炎的新型构建物。
Cureus. 2022 May 20;14(5):e25162. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25162. eCollection 2022 May.