Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, and Institute for Brain and Behaviour (IBBA) Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
CSI Lab, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Psychosis Studies, King's College London, London, UK.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;56(1):59-70. doi: 10.1177/00048674211010327. Epub 2021 May 18.
Recent findings suggest that diminished processing of positive contextual information about others during interactions may contribute to social impairment in the schizophrenia spectrum. This could be due to general social context processing deficits or specific biases against positive information. We studied the impact of positive and negative social contextual information during social interactions using functional neuroimaging and probed whether these neural mechanisms were associated with real-life social functioning in schizophrenia spectrum disorders.
Patients with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder ( = 23) and controls disorder ( = 25) played three multi-round trust games during functional magnetic resonance imaging scanning, with no, positive and negative information about the counterpart's trustworthiness, while all counterparts were programmed to behave trustworthy. The main outcome variable was the height of the shared amount in the trust game, i.e. investment, representing an indication of trust. The first investment in the game was considered to be basic trust, since no behavioural feedback was given yet. We performed region-of-interest analyses and examined the association with real-life social functioning using the experience sampling method.
Social contextual information had no effect on patients' first investments, whereas controls made the lowest investment after negative and the highest investments after positive contextual information was provided. Over trials, patients decreased investments, suggesting reduced social reward learning, whereas controls increased investments in response to behavioural feedback in the negative context. Patients engaged the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex less than controls during context presentation and showed reduced activity within the caudate during repayments. In patients, lower investments were associated with more time spent alone and social exclusion and lower caudate activation was marginally significantly associated with higher perceived social exclusion.
The failure to adapt trust to positive and negative social contexts suggests that patients have a general insensitivity to prior social information, indicating top-down processing impairments. In addition, patients show reduced sensitivity to social reward, i.e. bottom-up processing deficits. Moreover, lower trust and lower neural activation were related to lower real-life social functioning. Together, these findings indicate that improving trust and social interactions in schizophrenia spectrum needs a multi-faceted approach that targets both mechanisms.
最近的研究结果表明,在人际互动过程中,对他人积极背景信息的处理能力下降,可能导致精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的社交障碍。这种情况可能是由于一般社会背景处理缺陷,或者是对积极信息的特定偏见所致。我们使用功能磁共振成像研究了社交互动过程中积极和消极社会背景信息的影响,并探究了这些神经机制是否与精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的现实社交功能有关。
23 名精神分裂症谱系障碍患者和 25 名对照组参与者在功能磁共振成像扫描期间进行了三轮信任游戏,游戏中分别呈现了关于同伴可信度的无、正、负向社会情境信息,而所有同伴的行为都被设定为值得信任。主要的结果变量是信任游戏中的共享金额,即投资,代表信任的程度。游戏中的第一笔投资被认为是基本信任,因为此时还没有给出行为反馈。我们进行了感兴趣区域分析,并使用经验抽样法研究了与现实社交功能的关联。
社会情境信息对患者的第一笔投资没有影响,而对照组在呈现负向情境信息后做出的投资最少,在呈现正向情境信息后做出的投资最多。随着试验的进行,患者的投资减少,这表明他们的社会奖励学习能力下降,而对照组在负向情境中则根据行为反馈增加投资。与对照组相比,患者在呈现情境信息时背外侧前额叶皮层的活跃度较低,在回报阶段大脑纹状体的活跃度也较低。在患者中,较低的投资与独处时间和社会排斥感增加有关,而大脑纹状体的活跃度较低与感知到的社会排斥感增加呈边际显著相关。
患者无法根据积极和消极的社会情境调整信任,这表明他们对先前的社会信息普遍不敏感,提示存在自上而下的加工缺陷。此外,患者对社会奖励的敏感性降低,即存在自下而上的加工缺陷。此外,较低的信任和较低的神经激活与较低的现实社交功能有关。综上所述,改善精神分裂症谱系患者的信任和社交互动需要一种多方面的方法,同时针对这两种机制进行治疗。