Suppr超能文献

使用理论领域框架将依从性干预措施与患者决定因素相匹配。

Matching Adherence Interventions to Patient Determinants Using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

作者信息

Allemann Samuel S, Nieuwlaat Robby, van den Bemt Bart J F, Hersberger Kurt E, Arnet Isabelle

机构信息

Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel Basel, Switzerland.

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2016 Nov 14;7:429. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00429. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Despite much research, interventions to improve medication adherence report disappointing and inconsistent results. Tailored approaches that match interventions and patient determinants of non-adherence were seldom used in clinical trials. The presence of a multitude of theoretical frameworks and models to categorize interventions and patient determinants complicated the development of common categories shared by interventions and determinants. We retrieved potential interventions and patient determinants from published literature on medication adherence, matched them like locks and keys, and categorized them according to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). We identified the most relevant literature reviews on interventions and determinants in a pragmatic literature search, extracted all interventions and determinants, grouped similar concepts to umbrella terms and assigned them to TDF categories. All steps were finalized in consensus discussion between the authors. Sixteen articles (5 with determinants, 11 with interventions) were included for analysis. We extracted 103 interventions and 42 determinants that we divided in 26 modifiable and 16 unmodifiable determinants. All interventions and modifiable determinants were matched within 11 categories (Knowledge; Skills; Social/professional role and identity; Beliefs about capabilities; Beliefs about consequences; Intentions; Memory, Attention and decision processes; Environmental context and resources; Social influences; Emotion; and Behavioral regulation). In published trials on medication adherence, the congruence between interventions and determinants can be assessed with matching interventions to determinants. To be successful, interventions in medication adherence should target current modifiable determinants and be tailored to the unmodifiable determinants. Modifiable and unmodifiable determinants need to be assessed at inclusion of intervention studies to identify the patients most in need of an adherence intervention. Our matched categories may be useful to develop interventions in trials that investigate the effectiveness of adherence interventions.

摘要

尽管进行了大量研究,但旨在提高药物治疗依从性的干预措施所报告的结果令人失望且不一致。在临床试验中,很少使用将干预措施与患者不依从的决定因素相匹配的定制方法。众多用于对干预措施和患者决定因素进行分类的理论框架和模型的存在,使得干预措施和决定因素共有的通用类别难以形成。我们从已发表的关于药物治疗依从性的文献中检索了潜在的干预措施和患者决定因素,将它们像锁和钥匙一样进行匹配,并根据理论领域框架(TDF)进行分类。我们在一次务实的文献检索中确定了关于干预措施和决定因素的最相关文献综述,提取了所有的干预措施和决定因素,将相似的概念归为总括性术语,并将它们分配到TDF类别中。所有步骤都在作者之间的共识讨论中最终确定。纳入了16篇文章(5篇关于决定因素,11篇关于干预措施)进行分析。我们提取了103项干预措施和42个决定因素,将后者分为26个可改变的和16个不可改变的决定因素。所有干预措施和可改变的决定因素在11个类别(知识;技能;社会/专业角色和身份;对能力的信念;对后果的信念;意图;记忆、注意力和决策过程;环境背景和资源;社会影响;情绪;以及行为调节)中进行了匹配。在已发表的关于药物治疗依从性的试验中,可以通过将干预措施与决定因素进行匹配来评估干预措施与决定因素之间的一致性。为了取得成功,药物治疗依从性方面的干预措施应针对当前可改变的决定因素,并根据不可改变的决定因素进行定制。在纳入干预研究时,需要评估可改变和不可改变的决定因素,以确定最需要依从性干预的患者。我们匹配的类别可能有助于在研究依从性干预措施有效性的试验中开发干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5386/5107738/f9fbd26126eb/fphar-07-00429-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验