• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制药行业自律与不透明:七个欧洲国家支付给医疗保健专业人员的款项的国家和公司层面分析。

Pharmaceutical industry self-regulation and non-transparency: country and company level analysis of payments to healthcare professionals in seven European countries.

机构信息

Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Lund University, Sweden.

Euros for Docs, Paris, France.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2021 Jul;125(7):915-922. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.04.015. Epub 2021 May 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.04.015
PMID:34006392
Abstract

The European pharmaceutical industry uses the alleged efficacy of self-regulation to question the need for transparency laws similar to the US Physician Payment Sunshine Act. We conducted a comparative analysis of 20 large companies' payment disclosures in seven European countries in 2017-2019. The data was extracted as part of eurosfordocs.eu, a novel transparency project that scrapes and integrates publicly available databases and disclosures. Our analysis of EUR 735 million showed marked differences in country payment patterns. For example, payment totals per registered doctor were substantially larger in Spain and lowest in Sweden. There were significant country and company differences in individualized data completeness. Only 19% of totals were reported with recipient names in Germany, compared to Ireland (59%), the United Kingdom (60%), Italy (67%), Switzerland (73%), Sweden (79%) and Spain (100%), with little or no improvement over time. Payment data in Spain was particularly difficult to extract. Thus, in no country did self-regulation generate comprehensive individualized data allowing for building an accurate picture of financial relationships between the industry and healthcare professionals. We conclude that the cultures and policies of countries and companies create structural problems of data inaccessibility and incompleteness within the self-regulatory framework. Therefore, this study supports calls for a Europe-wide "Sunshine Act" to achieve real transparency of drug company payments.

摘要

欧洲制药业利用所谓的自律功效来质疑是否需要类似于美国医师薪酬阳光法案的透明度法规。我们对 2017 年至 2019 年七个欧洲国家的 20 家大公司的支付披露情况进行了比较分析。这些数据是作为 eurosfordocs.eu 透明度项目的一部分提取的,该项目是一个新颖的项目,可抓取和整合公开可用的数据库和披露信息。我们对 7.35 亿欧元的分析显示,各国的支付模式存在明显差异。例如,按注册医生计算的支付总额在西班牙和瑞典之间存在显著差异,在西班牙明显较高,在瑞典则明显较低。在个性化数据完整性方面,各国和各公司之间存在显著差异。在德国,只有 19%的总额报告了收件人姓名,而爱尔兰(59%)、英国(60%)、意大利(67%)、瑞士(73%)、瑞典(79%)和西班牙(100%)则报告了更多的总额,而且随着时间的推移并没有明显改善。西班牙的支付数据尤其难以提取。因此,在任何国家,自律都没有生成全面的个性化数据,无法准确描绘行业与医疗保健专业人员之间的财务关系。我们的结论是,国家和公司的文化和政策造成了数据无法获取和不完整的结构性问题,而这种问题存在于自律框架内。因此,本研究支持呼吁在欧洲范围内实施“阳光法案”,以实现药品公司支付的真正透明度。

相似文献

1
Pharmaceutical industry self-regulation and non-transparency: country and company level analysis of payments to healthcare professionals in seven European countries.制药行业自律与不透明:七个欧洲国家支付给医疗保健专业人员的款项的国家和公司层面分析。
Health Policy. 2021 Jul;125(7):915-922. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.04.015. Epub 2021 May 4.
2
Tip of the Iceberg? Country- and Company-Level Analysis of Drug Company Payments for Research and Development in Europe.冰山一角?欧洲药企研发付费的国家和企业层面分析。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 19;11(12):2842-2859. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6575. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
3
Accessibility and quality of drug company disclosures of payments to healthcare professionals and organisations in 37 countries: a European policy review.37 个国家/地区的制药公司向医疗保健专业人员和组织披露支付款项的可及性和质量:一项欧洲政策审查。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 16;11(12):e053138. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053138.
4
International comparison of pharmaceutical industry payment disclosures in the UK and Japan: implications for self-regulation, public regulation, and transparency.英国和日本制药行业支付披露的国际比较:对自我监管、公共监管和透明度的影响。
Global Health. 2023 Mar 3;19(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00902-9.
5
Sunshine Policies and Murky Shadows in Europe: Disclosure of Pharmaceutical Industry Payments to Health Professionals in Nine European Countries.欧洲的阳光政策与阴暗面:九个欧洲国家向卫生专业人员披露制药业付款情况。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jun 1;7(6):504-509. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.20.
6
Disclosure of Pharmaceutical Industry Funding of Patient Organisations in Nordic Countries: Can Industry Self-Regulation Deliver on its Transparency Promise?北欧国家制药行业对患者组织资助的披露:行业自律能否兑现其透明度承诺?
Int J Health Serv. 2022 Jul;52(3):347-362. doi: 10.1177/00207314221083871. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
7
Payments reported by the pharmaceutical industry in Ireland from 2015 to 2019: An observational study.爱尔兰制药行业2015年至2019年报告的付款情况:一项观察性研究。
Health Policy. 2021 Oct;125(10):1297-1304. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.07.016. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
8
Evaluation of Pharmaceutical Company Payments and Conflict of Interest Disclosures Among Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Authors in Japan.评价日本肿瘤临床实践指南作者的制药公司支付情况和利益冲突披露
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e192834. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.2834.
9
Voluntary disclosures of payments from pharmaceutical companies to healthcare professionals in Germany: a descriptive study of disclosures in 2015 and 2016.德国制药公司向医疗保健专业人员支付款项的自愿披露情况:2015年和2016年披露情况的描述性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 17;10(9):e037395. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037395.
10
Drug company methodologies used for reporting in the UK pharmaceutical industry payment transparency database between 2015 and 2019: A content analysis.2015 年至 2019 年期间,英国制药行业支付透明度数据库中报告使用的药物公司方法:内容分析。
Health Policy. 2024 Nov;149:105155. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105155. Epub 2024 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-Sectional Analysis of Research and Non-Research Payments From the Medical Device Industry to Healthcare Professionals and Organisations in Japan in 2022.2022年日本医疗器械行业向医疗保健专业人员和组织支付研究与非研究款项的横断面分析
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Mar;31(2):e70066. doi: 10.1111/jep.70066.
2
Pharmaceutical industry payments to healthcare professional organisations in the United Kingdom: a seven-year cross-sectional analysis of the Disclosure UK database from 2015 to 2021.英国制药行业向医疗专业组织的付款:对2015年至2021年英国披露数据库的七年横断面分析。
J R Soc Med. 2025 Jan;118(1):16-25. doi: 10.1177/01410768241297441. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
3
Pharmaceutical industry payments to NHS trusts in England: A four-year analysis of the Disclosure UK database.
英国制药业向国民保健制度信托基金的付款:英国披露数据库的四年分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 1;18(11):e0290022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290022. eCollection 2023.
4
Comparing pharmaceutical company payments in the four UK countries: a cross-sectional and social network analysis.比较英国四个国家的制药公司支付款项:一项横断面和社会网络分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 29;13(3):e061591. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061591.
5
International comparison of pharmaceutical industry payment disclosures in the UK and Japan: implications for self-regulation, public regulation, and transparency.英国和日本制药行业支付披露的国际比较:对自我监管、公共监管和透明度的影响。
Global Health. 2023 Mar 3;19(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00902-9.
6
Interaction between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: A scoping review for developing a policy brief.医生与制药行业的互动:制定政策简报的范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 12;10:1072708. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1072708. eCollection 2022.
7
Industry influence in healthcare harms patients: myth or maxim?医疗保健行业的影响对患者有害:是谬论还是真理?
Breathe (Sheff). 2022 Jun;18(2):220010. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0010-2022. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
8
Physicians' attitudes towards disclosure of payments from pharmaceutical companies in a nationwide voluntary transparency database: a cross-sectional survey.医生对全国性自愿透明度数据库中制药公司支付款项披露态度的调查:一项横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 24;12(6):e055963. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055963.
9
Health Services and Policy Research in Canada: An Editor's Reflections.加拿大的卫生服务与政策研究:编辑的反思。
Healthc Policy. 2022 Feb;17(3):42-48. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2022.26729.
10
National patient groups in Canada and their disclosure of relationships with pharmaceutical companies: a cross-sectional study.加拿大国家患者群体及其与制药公司关系的披露:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 9;12(3):e055287. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055287.