• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于社区药房环境下现场培训对用药错误的影响。

Impact of Live Training on Medication Errors in a Community-Based Pharmacy Setting.

作者信息

Grant Morgan, Remines Jamie, Nadpara Pramit, Goode Jean-Venable Kelly R

机构信息

Kroger Pharmacy.

Academia SME, Kroger Health & Wellness - Mid-Atlantic.

出版信息

Innov Pharm. 2020 Jul 31;11(3). doi: 10.24926/iip.v11i3.3291. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.24926/iip.v11i3.3291
PMID:34007633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8075146/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare community-based pharmacy medication errors before and after a one-hour live interactive training session for both pharmacists and technicians.

METHODS

A one group pre-post intervention design study was conducted in 20 community-based pharmacies in a district of a large national community pharmacy chain. A one-hour live, interactive session was developed based on incident reports and medication error trends including medication error definition, ways in which medication errors occur, strategies for mitigating errors, information about human error, and methods and habits to improve patient safety. At least 50% of full-time staff for each of the 20 pharmacies were required to attend a training session between December 1, 2017-January 15, 2018. Participants completed a demographics survey documenting gender, age, credentials, number of years of experience, and years of service with the company. Pharmacies were categorized as low, medium or high volume based on prescription count. Medication errors were compared six months pre- and post-live education session. Data were analyzed using SAS version 9.4.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty- five errors and 111 errors were reported pre-and post-live training (mean 6.85 and 5.55, p < 0.301), respectively. Nine pharmacies were low, eight medium, and three high volume with the mean number of medication errors reported pre- and post-live training; low 4.33 vs 4.11 p<0.478, medium 9.37 vs 6.87 p<0.443, and high 7.66 vs 6.33 p<0.593, respectively. Sixty pharmacy staff (34 pharmacists, 26 technicians) attended one of the live training sessions; 73% female; most frequently reported age range 35-50 years; 23 Doctor of Pharmacy, 11 Bachelor of Science in Pharmacy, and 26 Certified Technician; and average number of years' experience was 13.6 and average service with the company was 8.6 years.

CONCLUSIONS

A live training session for both pharmacists and technicians did not significantly decrease medication errors, but could be incorporated as an element of a medication safety program. It should be considered for implementation in other districts of this large national pharmacy chain as a part of an improved patient safety effort.

摘要

目的

比较针对药剂师和技术人员开展的一小时现场互动培训课程前后社区药房的用药差错情况。

方法

在一家大型全国性社区药房连锁企业某一区的20家社区药房开展了一项单组前后干预设计研究。基于事件报告和用药差错趋势开发了一个一小时的现场互动课程,内容包括用药差错定义、用药差错发生的方式、减轻差错的策略、人为差错信息以及提高患者安全的方法和习惯。要求这20家药房中至少50%的全职员工在2017年12月1日至2018年1月15日期间参加一次培训课程。参与者完成了一份人口统计学调查问卷,记录性别、年龄、资质、工作年限以及在公司的服务年限。药房根据处方量分为低、中、高三个类别。对现场培训课程前后六个月的用药差错情况进行了比较。使用SAS 9.4版本对数据进行分析。

结果

现场培训前和培训后分别报告了135起和111起差错(均值分别为6.85和5.55,p<0.301)。九家药房为低处方量,八家中等处方量,三家高处方量,报告的现场培训前后用药差错平均数分别为:低处方量药房4.33对4.11,p<0.478;中等处方量药房9.37对6.87,p<0.443;高处方量药房7.66对6.33,p<0.593。60名药房工作人员(34名药剂师、26名技术人员)参加了其中一次现场培训课程;73%为女性;最常报告的年龄范围为35至50岁;23名药学博士、11名药学理学学士和26名认证技术人员;平均工作年限为13.6年,在公司的平均服务年限为8.6年。

结论

针对药剂师和技术人员的现场培训课程并未显著减少用药差错,但可作为用药安全计划的一个要素纳入其中。作为改善患者安全工作的一部分,应考虑在这家大型全国性药房连锁企业的其他地区实施该培训课程。

相似文献

1
Impact of Live Training on Medication Errors in a Community-Based Pharmacy Setting.基于社区药房环境下现场培训对用药错误的影响。
Innov Pharm. 2020 Jul 31;11(3). doi: 10.24926/iip.v11i3.3291. eCollection 2020.
2
Implementation of technician-driven medication therapy management program in community pharmacies.在社区药店实施技师驱动的药物治疗管理计划。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2019 Jul-Aug;59(4S):S156-S160.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2019.06.014.
3
Certified pharmacy technicians' views on their medication preparation errors and educational needs.认证药剂师对其药品调配错误及教育需求的看法。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2005 Oct 1;62(19):1992-7. doi: 10.2146/ajhp040549.
4
Pharmacy technician involvement in community pharmacy medication therapy management.药剂师参与社区药房药物治疗管理。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2018 Mar-Apr;58(2):179-185.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2017.12.011. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
5
Student observations of medication error reporting practices in community pharmacy settings.学生对社区药店药物错误报告实践的观察。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Jul;15(7):902-906. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.02.009. Epub 2019 Mar 3.
6
Comparison of two training methods in community pharmacy: Project VACCINATE.社区药房中两种培训方法的比较:疫苗接种项目
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2018 Jul-Aug;58(4S):S94-S100.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 May 9.
7
What predicts medication therapy management completion rates? The role of community pharmacy staff characteristics and beliefs about medication therapy management.是什么预测了药物治疗管理的完成率?社区药房工作人员的特征以及对药物治疗管理的信念所起的作用。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2018 Jul-Aug;58(4S):S7-S15.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 May 3.
8
Training pharmacy technicians to administer immunizations.培训药剂技术员进行免疫接种。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2018 Mar-Apr;58(2):174-178.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
9
Detection and correct handling of prescribing errors in Dutch hospital pharmacies using test patients.使用测试患者检测和正确处理荷兰医院药房的处方错误。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Dec;35(6):1188-202. doi: 10.1007/s11096-013-9848-y. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
10
The impact of face-to-face educational outreach on diarrhoea treatment in pharmacies.面对面教育推广对药店腹泻治疗的影响。
Health Policy Plan. 1996 Sep;11(3):308-18. doi: 10.1093/heapol/11.3.308.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of Medication Errors in Community Pharmacy Settings: A Retrospective Report.社区药房环境中用药错误的评估:一份回顾性报告。
J Pharm Technol. 2016 Apr;32(2):71-74. doi: 10.1177/8755122515617199. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
2
Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US.医疗差错——美国第三大死因。
BMJ. 2016 May 3;353:i2139. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2139.
3
The fate of pediatric prescriptions in community pharmacies.社区药房中儿科处方的去向
J Patient Saf. 2015 Jun;11(2):79-88. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182948a7d.
4
The relationships among work stress, strain and self-reported errors in UK community pharmacy.英国社区药房中工作压力、应变与自我报告错误之间的关系。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014 Nov-Dec;10(6):885-895. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.12.003. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
5
'Inattentional blindness': what captures your attention?“无意视盲”:是什么吸引了你的注意力?
P T. 2012 Oct;37(10):542-55.
6
Preventing medication errors in community pharmacy: root-cause analysis of transcription errors.预防社区药房的用药错误:转录错误的根本原因分析
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Aug;16(4):285-90. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.022053.
7
National observational study of prescription dispensing accuracy and safety in 50 pharmacies.对50家药店处方配药准确性和安全性的全国性观察性研究。
J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2003 Mar-Apr;43(2):191-200. doi: 10.1331/108658003321480731.
8
Human error: models and management.人为错误:模型与管理
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):768-70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.768.