Olander Megan, Waring Stephen, Stenehjem David D, Taran Allise, Ranelli Paul, Brown Jacob T
College of Pharmacy University of Minnesota.
Essentia Health.
Innov Pharm. 2018 Apr 25;9(2):1-12. doi: 10.24926/iip.v9i2.970. eCollection 2018.
Considerable progress has been made in the way of pharmacogenetic research and the development of clinical recommendations; however, its implementation into clinical practice has been slower than anticipated. We sought to better understand its lack of clinical uptake within primary care.
The primary objective of this survey was to ascertain primary care clinicians' perceptions of pharmacogenetic use and implementation in an integrated health system of metropolitan and rural settings across several states.
Primary care clinicians (including MDs, DOs, NPs, and PAs) were invited to participate in a survey via email. Questions about pharmacogenetics knowledge and perceptions were presented to assess current understanding and usage of pharmacogenetics in practice.
The rate of response for the survey was 17%. Of the 90 respondents, 58% were female, 69% were MDs/DOs, 20% were NPs, and 11% were PAs. Fifty-eight percent of respondents received their clinical degree in or after 2000. Ninety percent of respondents noted that they were uncomfortable ordering a pharmacogenetics test, with 76% stating they were uncomfortable applying the results of a pharmacogenetic test. Notably, 78% of respondents were interested in having pharmacogenetic testing available through Medication Therapy Management (MTM) services, although PAs were significantly less interested as compared to NPs and MD/DOs. Ninety-five percent of respondents were interested in a clinical decision support tool relevant to pharmacogenetic results.
As a whole, prescribing clinicians in primary care clinics are uncomfortable in the ordering, interpreting, and applying pharmacogenetic results to individual patients. However, favorable attitudes towards providing pharmacogenetic testing through existing MTM clinics provides the opportunity for pharmacists to advance existing practices.
药物遗传学研究及临床建议的制定已取得显著进展;然而,其在临床实践中的应用却比预期的要慢。我们试图更好地理解其在基层医疗中缺乏临床应用的原因。
本次调查的主要目的是确定基层医疗临床医生对药物遗传学在多个州的大都市和农村地区综合卫生系统中的使用和实施情况的看法。
通过电子邮件邀请基层医疗临床医生(包括医学博士、骨科学博士、执业护士和助理医师)参与调查。提出了有关药物遗传学知识和看法的问题,以评估目前在实践中对药物遗传学的理解和使用情况。
调查的回复率为17%。在90名受访者中,58%为女性,69%为医学博士/骨科学博士,20%为执业护士,11%为助理医师。58%的受访者在2000年或之后获得临床学位。90%的受访者表示他们对开具药物遗传学检测单感到不自在,76%的受访者表示他们对应用药物遗传学检测结果感到不自在。值得注意的是,78%的受访者对通过药物治疗管理(MTM)服务进行药物遗传学检测感兴趣,尽管与执业护士和医学博士/骨科学博士相比,助理医师的兴趣明显较低。95%的受访者对与药物遗传学结果相关的临床决策支持工具感兴趣。
总体而言,基层医疗诊所的开处方临床医生在为个体患者开具、解读和应用药物遗传学结果方面感到不自在。然而,对通过现有MTM诊所提供药物遗传学检测持积极态度为药剂师改进现有做法提供了机会。