Sato Hideaki, Nakamura Hidetoshi, Nishida Yuki, Shirahata Toru, Yogi Sanehiro, Akagami Tomoe, Soma Machika, Inoue Kaiji, Niitsu Mamoru, Mio Tomohiko, Miyashita Tatsuyuki, Nagata Makoto, Nakae Satoshi, Yamada Yosuke, Tanaka Shigeho, Katsukawa Fuminori
Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
National Institute of Health and Nutrition, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Tokyo, Japan.
ERJ Open Res. 2021 May 4;7(2). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00407-2020. eCollection 2021 Apr.
Although weight loss suggests poor prognosis of COPD, only a few studies have examined total energy expenditure (TEE) or physical activity level (PAL) using the doubly labelled water (DLW) method. We evaluated TEE and PAL using the DLW method together with a triaxial accelerometer to elucidate the relationships between TEE, PAL and clinical parameters leading to a practical means of monitoring COPD physical status. This study evaluated 50- to 79-year-old male patients with mild to very severe COPD (n=28) or at risk for COPD (n=8). TEE, activity energy expenditure for 2 weeks and basal metabolic rate were measured by DLW, an accelerometer and indirect calorimetry, respectively. All patients underwent pulmonary function, chest-computed tomography, 6-min walk test, body composition and grip strength tests. Relationships between indices of energy expenditure and clinical parameters were analysed. Bland-Altman analysis was used to examine the agreement of TEE and PAL between the DLW method and the accelerometer. TEE and PAL using DLW in the total population were 2273±445 kcal·day and 1.80±0.20, respectively. TEE by DLW correlated well with that from the accelerometer and grip strength (p<0.0001), and PAL by DLW correlated well with that from the accelerometer (p<0.0001), grip strength and 6-min walk distance (p<0.001) among various clinical parameters. However, the accelerometer underestimated TEE (215±241 kcal·day) and PAL (0.18±0.16), with proportional biases in both indices. TEE and PAL can be estimated by accelerometer in patients with COPD if systematic errors and relevant clinical factors such as muscle strength and exercise capacity are accounted for.
尽管体重减轻提示慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)预后不良,但仅有少数研究使用双标记水(DLW)法检测了总能量消耗(TEE)或身体活动水平(PAL)。我们使用DLW法并结合三轴加速度计评估TEE和PAL,以阐明TEE、PAL与临床参数之间的关系,从而找到一种监测COPD身体状况的实用方法。本研究评估了50至79岁的男性患者,其中轻度至非常严重的COPD患者28例,COPD高危患者8例。分别通过DLW法、加速度计和间接测热法测量TEE、2周的活动能量消耗和基础代谢率。所有患者均接受了肺功能、胸部计算机断层扫描、6分钟步行试验、身体成分和握力测试。分析了能量消耗指标与临床参数之间的关系。采用Bland-Altman分析来检验DLW法与加速度计在TEE和PAL方面的一致性。总体人群中,使用DLW法测得的TEE和PAL分别为2273±445千卡/天和1.80±0.20。在各种临床参数中,DLW法测得的TEE与加速度计测得的TEE以及握力显著相关(p<0.0001),DLW法测得的PAL与加速度计测得的PAL、握力以及6分钟步行距离显著相关(p<0.001)。然而,加速度计低估了TEE(215±241千卡/天)和PAL(0.18±0.16),且两个指标均存在比例偏差。如果考虑到系统误差以及肌肉力量和运动能力等相关临床因素,加速度计可用于估算COPD患者的TEE和PAL。