Butte Nancy F, Wong William W, Wilson Theresa A, Adolph Anne L, Puyau Maurice R, Zakeri Issa F
From the USDA/Agricultural Research Service Children's Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX (NFB, WWW, TAW, ALA, and MRP), and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA (IFZ).
Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Jul;100(1):161-7. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.081703. Epub 2014 May 7.
Dietary Reference Intakes (DRI) for energy aim to balance energy expenditure at a level of physical activity consistent with health and support adequate growth in children. DRIs were derived from total energy expenditure (TEE) measured by using the doubly labeled water (DLW) method; however, the database was limited in the 3-5-y-old range.
We reexamined the DRI for energy for preschool-age children.
Ninety-seven healthy, normal-weight, preschool-age children (mean ± SD age: 4.5 ± 0.9 y) completed a 7-d DLW protocol while wearing accelerometer and heart rate-monitoring devices.
Mean TEE and physical activity level (PAL) averaged 1159 ± 171 kcal/d and 1.34 ± 0.14, respectively. TEE predicted by DRI equations agreed with observed TEE (+34 kcal/d or 3%) if the sedentary PAL category was assumed but was overestimated by using the low active (+219 kcal/d or 19%), active (398 kcal/d or 34%), and very active (593 kcal/d or 51%) PAL categories. PAL categories were redefined on the basis of the narrower PAL range observed in preschoolers (range: 1.05-1.70) compared with older children and adults (range: 1.0-2.5). Sex-specific nonlinear regression models were newly developed to predict TEE from age, weight, height, and new PAL categories. The mean absolute error of TEE prediction equations was 0.00 ± 35 kcal/d or 0.1 ± 3%. Ancillary measures, such as total accelerometer counts and total daily steps, that were significantly correlated (P = 0.01-0.05) with TEE (r = 0.26-0.38), TEE per kilogram (r = 0.31-0.41), and PAL (r = 0.36-0.48) may assist in the classification of preschoolers into PAL categories.
Current DRIs for energy overestimate energy requirements of preschool-age children because of the erroneous classification of children into PAL categories. New TEE prediction equations that are based on DLW and appropriate PAL categories are recommended for preschool-age children. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as H12067.
能量的膳食参考摄入量(DRI)旨在使能量消耗与健康相适应的身体活动水平保持平衡,并支持儿童的充分生长发育。DRI是通过使用双标水(DLW)法测量的总能量消耗(TEE)得出的;然而,该数据库在3至5岁年龄段的数据有限。
我们重新审视了学龄前儿童的能量DRI。
97名健康、体重正常的学龄前儿童(平均年龄±标准差:4.5±0.9岁)在佩戴加速度计和心率监测设备的同时,完成了为期7天的DLW方案。
平均TEE和身体活动水平(PAL)分别为1159±171千卡/天和1.34±0.14。如果假设为久坐PAL类别,DRI方程预测的TEE与观察到的TEE相符(+34千卡/天或3%),但使用低活动(+219千卡/天或19%)、活动(398千卡/天或34%)和非常活跃(593千卡/天或51%)PAL类别时则被高估。与大龄儿童和成年人(范围:1.0 - 2.5)相比,根据学龄前儿童观察到的更窄的PAL范围(范围:1.05 - 1.70)重新定义了PAL类别。新开发了性别特异性非线性回归模型,以根据年龄、体重、身高和新的PAL类别预测TEE。TEE预测方程的平均绝对误差为0.00±35千卡/天或0.1±3%。与TEE(r = 0.26 - 0.38)、每千克TEE(r = 0.31 - 0.41)和PAL(r = 0.36 - 0.48)显著相关(P = 0.01 - 0.05)的辅助测量指标(如总加速度计计数和每日总步数)可能有助于将学龄前儿童分类到PAL类别中。
由于将儿童错误分类到PAL类别中,目前的能量DRI高估了学龄前儿童的能量需求。建议为学龄前儿童使用基于DLW和适当PAL类别的新TEE预测方程。该试验在clinicaltrials.gov上注册为H12067。