Suppr超能文献

使用集成在助听器中的加速度计估计中老年人日常生活活动中的能量消耗。

Energy expenditure estimation during activities of daily living in middle-aged and older adults using an accelerometer integrated into a hearing aid.

作者信息

Stutz Jan, Eichenberger Philipp A, Stumpf Nina, Knobel Samuel E J, Herbert Nicholas C, Hirzel Isabel, Huber Sacha, Oetiker Chiara, Urry Emily, Lambercy Olivier, Spengler Christina M

机构信息

Exercise Physiology Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Research & Development, Sonova AG, Stäfa, Switzerland.

出版信息

Front Digit Health. 2024 Jun 17;6:1400535. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1400535. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accelerometers were traditionally worn on the hip to estimate energy expenditure (EE) during physical activity but are increasingly replaced by products worn on the wrist to enhance wear compliance, despite potential compromises in EE estimation accuracy. In the older population, where the prevalence of hearing loss is higher, a new, integrated option may arise. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the accuracy and precision of EE estimates using an accelerometer integrated into a hearing aid and compare its performance with sensors simultaneously worn on the wrist and hip.

METHODS

Sixty middle-aged to older adults (average age 64.0 ± 8.0 years, 48% female) participated. They performed a 20-min resting energy expenditure measurement (after overnight fast) followed by a standardized breakfast and 13 different activities of daily living, 12 of them were individually selected from a set of 35 activities, ranging from sedentary and low intensity to more dynamic and physically demanding activities. Using indirect calorimetry as a reference for the metabolic equivalent of task (MET), we compared the EE estimations made using a hearing aid integrated device (Audéo) against those of a research device worn on the hip (ZurichMove) and consumer devices positioned on the wrist (Garmin and Fitbit). Class-estimated and class-known models were used to evaluate the accuracy and precision of EE estimates via Bland-Altman analyses.

RESULTS

The findings reveal a mean bias and 95% limit of agreement for Audéo (class-estimated model) of -0.23 ± 3.33 METs, indicating a slight advantage over wrist-worn consumer devices (Garmin: -0.64 ± 3.53 METs and Fitbit: -0.67 ± 3.40 METs). Class-know models reveal a comparable performance between Audéo (-0.21 ± 2.51 METs) and ZurichMove (-0.13 ± 2.49 METs). Sub-analyses show substantial variability in accuracy for different activities and good accuracy when activities are averaged over a typical day's usage of 10 h (+61 ± 302 kcal).

DISCUSSION

This study shows the potential of hearing aid-integrated accelerometers in accurately estimating EE across a wide range of activities in the target demographic, while also highlighting the necessity for ongoing optimization efforts considering precision limitations observed across both consumer and research devices.

摘要

背景

传统上,加速度计佩戴在髋部以估计身体活动期间的能量消耗(EE),但为了提高佩戴依从性,越来越多地被佩戴在手腕上的产品所取代,尽管这可能会在EE估计准确性方面有所妥协。在听力损失患病率较高的老年人群中,可能会出现一种新的集成选项。因此,本研究旨在调查使用集成在助听器中的加速度计估计EE的准确性和精密度,并将其性能与同时佩戴在手腕和髋部的传感器进行比较。

方法

60名中年至老年成年人(平均年龄64.0±8.0岁,48%为女性)参与了研究。他们进行了20分钟的静息能量消耗测量(过夜禁食后),随后是标准化早餐和13种不同的日常生活活动,其中12种是从35种活动中单独挑选出来的,范围从久坐和低强度活动到更具活力和体力要求更高的活动。使用间接量热法作为任务代谢当量(MET)的参考,我们将使用集成在助听器中的设备(奥迪欧)进行的EE估计与佩戴在髋部的研究设备(苏黎世移动)以及佩戴在手腕上的消费设备(佳明和Fitbit)进行的EE估计进行了比较。通过布兰德-奥特曼分析,使用类别估计模型和类别已知模型来评估EE估计的准确性和精密度。

结果

研究结果显示,奥迪欧(类别估计模型)的平均偏差和95%一致性界限为-0.23±3.33 METs,表明其比佩戴在手腕上的消费设备(佳明:-0.64±3.53 METs和Fitbit:-0.67±3.40 METs)略有优势。类别已知模型显示,奥迪欧(-0.21±2.51 METs)和苏黎世移动(-0.13±2.49 METs)的性能相当。子分析表明,不同活动的准确性存在很大差异,而当在典型的10小时日常使用中对活动进行平均时,准确性良好(+61±302千卡)。

讨论

本研究表明,集成在助听器中的加速度计在准确估计目标人群广泛活动中的EE方面具有潜力,同时也强调了考虑到在消费设备和研究设备中观察到的精度限制而持续进行优化努力的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e269/11215182/9f9910df261a/fdgth-06-1400535-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验