Suppr超能文献

可切除结直肠腹膜转移的围手术期全身治疗与单独细胞减灭术和腹腔热灌注化疗的比较:一项 2 期随机临床试验。

Perioperative Systemic Therapy vs Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Alone for Resectable Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2021 Aug 1;156(8):710-720. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.1642.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

To date, no randomized clinical trials have investigated perioperative systemic therapy relative to cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) alone for resectable colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM).

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility and safety of perioperative systemic therapy in patients with resectable CPM and the response of CPM to neoadjuvant treatment.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An open-label, parallel-group phase 2 randomized clinical trial in all 9 Dutch tertiary centers for the surgical treatment of CPM enrolled participants between June 15, 2017, and January 9, 2019. Participants were patients with pathologically proven isolated resectable CPM who did not receive systemic therapy within 6 months before enrollment.

INTERVENTIONS

Randomization to perioperative systemic therapy or CRS-HIPEC alone. Perioperative systemic therapy comprised either four 3-week neoadjuvant and adjuvant cycles of CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin), six 2-week neoadjuvant and adjuvant cycles of FOLFOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin), or six 2-week neoadjuvant cycles of FOLFIRI (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan) and either four 3-week adjuvant cycles of capecitabine or six 2-week adjuvant cycles of fluorouracil with leucovorin. Bevacizumab was added to the first 3 (CAPOX) or 4 (FOLFOX/FOLFIRI) neoadjuvant cycles.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Proportions of macroscopic complete CRS-HIPEC and Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher postoperative morbidity. Key secondary outcomes were centrally assessed rates of objective radiologic and major pathologic response of CPM to neoadjuvant treatment. Analyses were done modified intention-to-treat in patients starting neoadjuvant treatment (experimental arm) or undergoing upfront surgery (control arm).

RESULTS

In 79 patients included in the analysis (43 [54%] men; mean [SD] age, 62 [10] years), experimental (n = 37) and control (n = 42) arms did not differ significantly regarding the proportions of macroscopic complete CRS-HIPEC (33 of 37 [89%] vs 36 of 42 [86%] patients; risk ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.88-1.23; P = .74) and Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher postoperative morbidity (8 of 37 [22%] vs 14 of 42 [33%] patients; risk ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.31-1.37; P = .25). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Objective radiologic and major pathologic response rates of CPM to neoadjuvant treatment were 28% (9 of 32 evaluable patients) and 38% (13 of 34 evaluable patients), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized phase 2 trial in patients diagnosed with resectable CPM, perioperative systemic therapy seemed feasible, safe, and able to induce response of CPM, justifying a phase 3 trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02758951.

摘要

重要性

迄今为止,尚无随机临床试验研究过围手术期全身治疗与单独的细胞减灭术和腹腔热灌注化疗(CRS-HIPEC)相比,在可切除的结直肠腹膜转移(CPM)患者中的作用。

目的

评估可切除 CPM 患者围手术期全身治疗的可行性和安全性,以及 CPM 对新辅助治疗的反应。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在所有 9 家荷兰三级 CPM 外科治疗中心进行的开放标签、平行组的 2 期随机临床试验,于 2017 年 6 月 15 日至 2019 年 1 月 9 日期间招募参与者。参与者为病理证实孤立可切除 CPM 的患者,在入组前 6 个月内未接受全身治疗。

干预措施

随机分配至围手术期全身治疗或单独 CRS-HIPEC。围手术期全身治疗包括 CAPOX(卡培他滨和奥沙利铂)4 个 3 周新辅助和辅助周期、FOLFOX(氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙和奥沙利铂)6 个 2 周新辅助和辅助周期、FOLFIRI(氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙和伊立替康)6 个 2 周新辅助周期,以及卡培他滨 4 个 3 周辅助周期或氟尿嘧啶联合亚叶酸钙 6 个 2 周辅助周期。贝伐单抗添加到前 3(CAPOX)或 4(FOLFOX/FOLFIRI)个新辅助周期中。

主要结果和测量指标

CPM 行 CRS-HIPEC 的宏观完全缓解率和 Clavien-Dindo 分级 3 级或更高的术后发病率。主要次要结局是评估 CPM 对新辅助治疗的客观放射学和主要病理学反应的中心评估率。在开始新辅助治疗的患者(实验组)或接受直接手术的患者(对照组)中进行了改良意向治疗分析。

结果

在 79 名纳入分析的患者(43 名[54%]男性;平均[SD]年龄 62[10]岁)中,实验组(n = 37)和对照组(n = 42)在 CRS-HIPEC 的宏观完全缓解率(33/37[89%]与 36/42[86%]患者;风险比,1.04;95%CI,0.88-1.23;P = 0.74)和 Clavien-Dindo 分级 3 级或更高的术后发病率(8/37[22%]与 14/42[33%]患者;风险比,0.65;95%CI,0.31-1.37;P = 0.25)方面无显著差异。无治疗相关死亡。CPM 对新辅助治疗的客观放射学和主要病理学反应率分别为 28%(32 名可评估患者中的 9 名)和 38%(34 名可评估患者中的 13 名)。

结论和相关性

在这项针对可切除 CPM 患者的随机 2 期试验中,围手术期全身治疗似乎是可行的、安全的,并且能够诱导 CPM 发生反应,这证明了进行 3 期试验的合理性。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02758951。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验