Schultz Kurt S, Bansal Varun V, Wach Michael M, Bhutiani Neal, Godley Frederick A, Wang Jaeyun Jane, Waheed Muhammad Talha, Buchheit Joanna T, Papai Emily, Campbell Susan, Schleimer Lauren E, Su David G, Turaga Kiran K, Gunderson Craig G, White Michael G, Uppal Abhineet, Raghav Kanwal P S, Labow Daniel M, Sarpel Umut, Shergill Ardaman P, Shen John Paul, Eng Cathy, Foote Michael B, Baumgartner Joel M
Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17363-0.
BACKGROUND: The peritoneum is a common site of metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC), yet controversy exists regarding optimal treatment strategies. These guidelines describe the results of a national consensus addressing the management of CRC with peritoneal metastases (CRC-PM). METHODS: An update of the 2018 Chicago Consensus Guidelines was conducted using a modified Delphi technique. Two rounds of voting were performed to assess agreement levels on two clinical management pathways regarding synchronous and metachronous CRC-PM. Supporting evidence was evaluated via rapid literature reviews. RESULTS: The overall level of evidence was low in existing literature. Of 145 participants in the first round, 136 (96.8%) responded in the second round. Over 90% consensus was achieved in most pathway blocks. For both pathways, early referral to a peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) center should be made for patients with CRC-PM. For the synchronous pathway, upfront cytoreductive surgery was de-emphasized in favor of systemic therapy. For the metachronous pathway, risk stratification via clinical and pathologic features was revised. For both pathways, surveillance strategies were added, including only a weak recommendation for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing given limited evidence of its utility in detecting and monitoring PM. CONCLUSION: The consensus-driven clinical pathways provide valuable guidance for the management of CRC-PM. There remains a need for high-quality evidence and prospective multicenter trials in this domain.
背景:腹膜是结直肠癌(CRC)转移的常见部位,但关于最佳治疗策略仍存在争议。本指南描述了一项全国性共识的结果,该共识涉及结直肠癌伴腹膜转移(CRC-PM)的管理。 方法:采用改良的德尔菲技术对2018年芝加哥共识指南进行更新。进行了两轮投票,以评估关于同步性和异时性CRC-PM的两条临床管理途径的共识水平。通过快速文献综述评估支持证据。 结果:现有文献中的总体证据水平较低。第一轮的145名参与者中,136名(96.8%)在第二轮中做出了回应。大多数途径模块达成了超过90%的共识。对于这两条途径,CRC-PM患者均应尽早转诊至腹膜表面恶性肿瘤(PSM)中心。对于同步途径,不再强调 upfront 细胞减灭术,而是倾向于全身治疗。对于异时途径,通过临床和病理特征进行的风险分层得到了修订。对于这两条途径,均增加了监测策略,鉴于循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)检测在检测和监测PM方面的效用证据有限,仅对其进行了弱推荐。 结论:基于共识的临床途径为CRC-PM的管理提供了有价值的指导。该领域仍需要高质量的证据和前瞻性多中心试验。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025-6-25
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025-6-25
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025-6-25
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025-6-30
JAMA Netw Open. 2023-11-1
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024-3
N Engl J Med. 2023-5-4