• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用眼动追踪技术研究接管前视觉接触对自动驾驶中情境意识的影响。

Using eye-tracking to investigate the effects of pre-takeover visual engagement on situation awareness during automated driving.

机构信息

School of Industrial Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States.

Ford Motor Company, Dearborn, MI, United States.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jul;157:106143. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106143. Epub 2021 May 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2021.106143
PMID:34010743
Abstract

Automated driving systems are becoming increasingly prevalent throughout society. In conditionally automated vehicles, drivers may engage in non-driving-related tasks (NDRTs), which can negatively affect their situation awareness (SA) and preparedness to resume control of the vehicle, when necessary. Previous work has investigated engagement in NDRTs, but questions remain unanswered regarding its effect on drivers' SA during a takeover event. The objective of the current study is to use eye-tracking to aid in understanding how visual engagement in NDRTs affects changes in SA of the driving environment after a takeover request (TOR) has been issued. Thirty participants rode in a simulated SAE Level 3 automated driving environment and engaged in three separate pre-TOR tasks (Surrogate Reference Task, Monitoring Task, and Peripheral Detection Task) until presented with a TOR. Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT) scores and gaze behavior were recorded during the post-TOR segment. Overall, longer times spent viewing the driving scene, and more dispersed visual attention allocation, were observed to be associated with better overall SA. Also, location-based eye tracking metrics show most promise in differentiating between task conditions with significantly different SAGAT scores. Findings from this work can inform the development of real-time SA assessment techniques using eye movements and ultimately contribute to improved operator roadway awareness for next-generation automated transportation.

摘要

自动驾驶系统在社会中越来越普及。在条件自动化车辆中,驾驶员可能会从事与驾驶无关的任务(NDRTs),这可能会降低他们的情境意识(SA)和对车辆进行恢复控制的准备,在必要时。以前的工作已经研究了从事 NDRTs 的情况,但对于其对接管事件期间驾驶员 SA 的影响,仍有一些问题尚未得到解答。本研究的目的是使用眼动追踪来帮助理解在发出接管请求(TOR)后,视觉参与 NDRTs 如何影响驾驶环境的 SA 变化。三十名参与者在模拟 SAE 级别 3 自动驾驶环境中行驶,并在接到 TOR 之前进行了三个单独的预 TOR 任务(替代参考任务、监控任务和周边检测任务)。在 TOR 后段记录了情境意识全局评估技术(SAGAT)得分和注视行为。总体而言,观察到花在查看驾驶场景上的时间更长,视觉注意力分配更分散,与整体 SA 更好相关。此外,基于位置的眼动追踪指标在区分具有显著不同 SAGAT 得分的任务条件方面显示出最大的潜力。这项工作的结果可以为使用眼动追踪来开发实时 SA 评估技术提供信息,并最终有助于提高下一代自动化交通的操作人员对道路的认识。

相似文献

1
Using eye-tracking to investigate the effects of pre-takeover visual engagement on situation awareness during automated driving.利用眼动追踪技术研究接管前视觉接触对自动驾驶中情境意识的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jul;157:106143. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106143. Epub 2021 May 16.
2
Supervising the self-driving car: Situation awareness and fatigue during highly automated driving.监管自动驾驶汽车:高度自动化驾驶中的情境意识和疲劳。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Jul;187:107068. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107068. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
3
The effects of takeover request lead time on drivers' situation awareness for manually exiting from freeways: A web-based study on level 3 automated vehicles.接管请求提前期对驾驶员从高速公路手动驶出的情境意识的影响:基于网络的 3 级自动驾驶汽车研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Apr;168:106593. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106593. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
4
Impact of duration of monitoring before takeover request on takeover time with insights into eye tracking data.接管请求前监测持续时间对接管时间的影响,并深入分析眼动追踪数据。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Jun;185:107018. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107018. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
5
Behavioral Changes to Repeated Takeovers in Highly Automated Driving: Effects of the Takeover-Request Design and the Nondriving-Related Task Modality.高度自动驾驶中多次接管的行为变化:接管请求设计和非驾驶相关任务模式的影响。
Hum Factors. 2019 Aug;61(5):839-849. doi: 10.1177/0018720818814963. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
6
Predicting driver takeover performance in conditionally automated driving.预测条件自动化驾驶中的驾驶员接管性能。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Dec;148:105748. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105748. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
7
Enhancing safety in conditionally automated driving: Can more takeover request visual information make a difference in hazard scenarios with varied hazard visibility?提高有条件自动化驾驶的安全性:在具有不同危险可见度的危险场景中,更多接管请求视觉信息是否会产生影响?
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Sep;205:107687. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107687. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
8
Effects of Task-Induced Fatigue in Prolonged Conditional Automated Driving.任务诱导疲劳对长时间条件自动化驾驶的影响。
Hum Factors. 2019 Nov;61(7):1186-1199. doi: 10.1177/0018720818816226. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
9
Psychophysiological responses to takeover requests in conditionally automated driving.条件自动化驾驶中接管请求的心理生理响应。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Dec;148:105804. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105804. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
10
Impact of non-driving related tasks while operating automated driving systems (ADS): A systematic review.驾驶相关任务对操作自动驾驶系统(ADS)的影响:系统评价。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Aug;188:107076. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107076. Epub 2023 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of Landmark Salience on Drivers' Spatial Cognition and Takeover Performance in Autonomous Driving Scenarios.地标显著性对自动驾驶场景中驾驶员空间认知及接管性能的影响
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 16;15(7):966. doi: 10.3390/bs15070966.
2
Explicit metrics for implicit emotions: investigating physiological and gaze indices of learner emotions.用于隐性情绪的明确指标:探究学习者情绪的生理和注视指标
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 13;15:1440425. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1440425. eCollection 2024.
3
Exploring the Relationship Between Drivers' Stationary Gaze Entropy and Situation Awareness in a Level-3 Automation Driving Simulation.
在三级自动化驾驶模拟中探索驾驶员静止注视熵与态势感知之间的关系。
Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2024 Sep;68(1):879-884. doi: 10.1177/10711813241275910. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
4
Analyzing Factors Influencing Situation Awareness in Autonomous Vehicles-A Survey.分析影响自动驾驶汽车情境意识的因素——综述
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Apr 18;23(8):4075. doi: 10.3390/s23084075.
5
(Mis-)use of standard Autopilot and Full Self-Driving (FSD) Beta: Results from interviews with users of Tesla's FSD Beta.标准自动驾驶仪和完全自动驾驶(FSD)测试版的(误)用:对特斯拉FSD测试版用户的访谈结果
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 23;14:1101520. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1101520. eCollection 2023.
6
Driving Activity Recognition Using UWB Radar and Deep Neural Networks.基于超宽带雷达和深度神经网络的驾驶行为识别
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jan 10;23(2):818. doi: 10.3390/s23020818.
7
Impact of Post-Covid-19 on driver behaviour: A perspective towards pandemic-sustained transportation.新冠疫情后对驾驶员行为的影响:关于疫情持续期间交通运输的一种观点。
J Transp Health. 2023 Jan;28:101563. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2022.101563. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
8
Visual Attention of Anesthesia Providers in Simulated Anesthesia Emergencies Using Conventional Number-Based and Avatar-Based Patient Monitoring: Prospective Eye-Tracking Study.在模拟麻醉紧急情况中,使用传统数字式和基于虚拟人的患者监测时麻醉医护人员的视觉注意力:前瞻性眼动追踪研究
JMIR Serious Games. 2022 Mar 22;10(1):e35642. doi: 10.2196/35642.