Gentry L O, Zeluff B J, Cooley D A
Infectious Diseases Section, St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, TX 77030.
Ann Thorac Surg. 1988 Aug;46(2):167-71. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)65890-0.
We undertook a prospective randomized evaluation of cefamandole nafate, cefuroxime sodium, and cefazolin sodium as prophylaxis in open-heart operations. A total of 903 patients having an elective procedure were enrolled in the study, and 620 of them were eventually considered evaluable. There were no significant differences between the three study groups. The overall rate of infection and the rate of infection according to demographic variables was not significantly different between the three antibiotics. Serious complications and deaths were also similar between the three agents. The presence of multiple severe underlying conditions was a risk factor for infection, independent of the antibiotic used. We conclude that there are no differences in the efficacies of the three agents in preventing postoperative infections in patients having open-heart operation. Cefuroxime, principally because of its every-12-hour dose, is far less expensive than cefamandole or cefazolin.
我们对头孢孟多酯钠、头孢呋辛钠和头孢唑林钠在心脏直视手术中作为预防用药进行了前瞻性随机评估。共有903例接受择期手术的患者纳入本研究,其中620例最终被认为可进行评估。三个研究组之间无显著差异。三种抗生素在总体感染率以及根据人口统计学变量的感染率方面无显著差异。三种药物在严重并发症和死亡率方面也相似。存在多种严重基础疾病是感染的一个危险因素,与所使用的抗生素无关。我们得出结论,三种药物在预防心脏直视手术患者术后感染的疗效上无差异。头孢呋辛主要因其每12小时给药一次,比头孢孟多或头孢唑林便宜得多。