Suppr超能文献

心血管手术围手术期抗菌药物预防。一项前瞻性随机试验,比较头孢呋辛两日预防用药与头孢唑林四日预防用药。

Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in cardiovascular surgery. A prospective randomized trial comparing two day cefuroxime prophylaxis with four day cefazolin prophylaxis.

作者信息

Geroulanos S, Oxelbark S, Turina M

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1986 May-Jun;27(3):300-6.

PMID:3514630
Abstract

In a randomized prospective study, two different regimens of antibiotic prophylaxis have been tested: four-day cefazolin prophylaxis (Kefzol 0.5 gr every 6 h) compared with two-day cefuroxime administration (Zinacef 1.5 gr every 12 h). A total of 569 patients in the two groups were studied in a 10 month period. Haematological, liver function, serum creatinine and urea measurement were made preoperatively and repeated daily for the first four days and after one week. At least five chest X-rays were taken during the hospitalisation. Body temperature was measured regularly every two hours in the ICU and a least twice a day thereafter. The wounds were examined daily and the patients were carefully observed for other infections. Bacteriological examinations of the tips of all inserted catheters and pacemaker wires were undertaken on removal in the first four months of the trial. Swabs of any tracheal or wound secretion or pus taken for bacteriological examinations as also blood cultures in any suspected septicaemia. Of the 569 patients three had to be withdrawn from the study. Of the assessable ones 285 received cefuroxime and 281 were given cefazolin. Seven patients (1.2%) died postoperatively. The total infection rate was 5.5%: 5.7% in the cefazolin group and 5.3% in the cefuroxime group. The overall wound infection rate was 1.8%: 2.5% in the cefazolin group and 1.1% in the cefuroxime group. Septicaemia occurred in 0.5% of the cases. Pneumonia occurred in 11 (1.9%) patients; 1.5% in the cefazolin and 2.5% in the cefuroxime group. Seven patients (1.2%) developed a urinary tract infection; 1.4% in the cefazolin group and 1.1% in the cefuroxime group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在一项随机前瞻性研究中,对两种不同的抗生素预防方案进行了测试:为期四天的头孢唑林预防(头孢唑林0.5克,每6小时一次)与为期两天的头孢呋辛给药(头孢呋辛1.5克,每12小时一次)。在10个月的时间里,对两组共569例患者进行了研究。术前进行血液学、肝功能、血清肌酐和尿素测量,并在头四天每天重复测量,一周后再次测量。住院期间至少拍摄五张胸部X光片。在重症监护病房每两小时定期测量体温,此后每天至少测量两次。每天检查伤口,并仔细观察患者是否有其他感染。在试验的前四个月,对所有插入的导管尖端和起搏器导线进行拔除时的细菌学检查。对任何气管或伤口分泌物或脓液进行拭子细菌学检查,以及对任何疑似败血症患者进行血培养。569例患者中有3例不得不退出研究。在可评估的患者中,285例接受了头孢呋辛,281例接受了头孢唑林。7例患者(1.2%)术后死亡。总感染率为5.5%:头孢唑林组为5.7%,头孢呋辛组为5.3%。总体伤口感染率为1.8%:头孢唑林组为2.5%,头孢呋辛组为1.1%。败血症发生率为0.5%。11例(1.9%)患者发生肺炎;头孢唑林组为1.5%,头孢呋辛组为2.5%。7例患者(1.2%)发生尿路感染;头孢唑林组为1.4%,头孢呋辛组为1.1%。(摘要截取自250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验