• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Translating caring competencies to remote working environments: a systematic review protocol.将关怀能力转化到远程工作环境中:系统综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 19;11(5):e048459. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048459.
2
A systematic review of online education initiatives to develop students remote caring skills and practices.一项关于在线教育计划以培养学生远程关怀技能和实践的系统评价。
Med Educ Online. 2022 Dec;27(1):2088049. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2088049.
3
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
8
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
9
Barriers and facilitators to dementia care in long-term care facilities: protocol for a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.长期护理机构中痴呆症护理的障碍和促进因素:定性系统评价和荟萃综合的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 1;13(11):e076058. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076058.
10
COVID-19-related stress among emergency physicians: a scoping review protocol on the stressors and coping strategies.COVID-19 相关压力对急诊医师的影响:压力源和应对策略的范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 3;13(3):e068085. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068085.

引用本文的文献

1
Supporting Web-Based Teaching and Learning of Virtual Care Skills and Competencies: Development of an Evidence-Informed Framework.支持基于网络的虚拟护理技能与能力教学:循证框架的开发
JMIR Nurs. 2025 Jul 3;8:e75868. doi: 10.2196/75868.
2
A systematic review of online education initiatives to develop students remote caring skills and practices.一项关于在线教育计划以培养学生远程关怀技能和实践的系统评价。
Med Educ Online. 2022 Dec;27(1):2088049. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2088049.

本文引用的文献

1
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.《PRISMA 2020声明:报告系统评价的更新指南》
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.
2
Open educational resources: expanding equity or reflecting and furthering inequities?
Educ Technol Res Dev. 2021;69(1):407-410. doi: 10.1007/s11423-020-09840-y. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
3
The unequal impact of the coronavirus pandemic: Evidence from seventeen developing countries.新冠疫情大流行的不平等影响:来自十七个发展中国家的证据。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 7;15(10):e0239797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239797. eCollection 2020.
4
Nursing education in a pandemic: Academic challenges in response to COVID-19.疫情下的护理教育:应对新冠疫情的学术挑战
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Sep;92:104471. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104471. Epub 2020 May 28.
5
Provision of e-learning programmes to replace undergraduate medical students' clinical general practice attachments during COVID-19 stand-down.在 COVID-19 停课期间提供电子学习课程以取代本科医学生的临床全科实习。
Educ Prim Care. 2020 Jul;31(4):247-254. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2020.1772123. Epub 2020 May 29.
6
COVID-19 exacerbating inequalities in the US.新冠疫情加剧美国的不平等现象。
Lancet. 2020 Apr 18;395(10232):1243-1244. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30893-X.
7
Combating COVID-19: health equity matters.抗击新冠疫情:健康公平至关重要。
Nat Med. 2020 Apr;26(4):458. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0823-6.
8
Moving knowledge into action for more effective practice, programmes and policy: protocol for a research programme on integrated knowledge translation.将知识转化为行动,以实现更有效的实践、项目和政策:综合知识转化研究计划方案。
Implement Sci. 2018 Feb 2;13(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0700-y.
9
Qualitative and mixed methods in systematic reviews.系统评价中的定性和混合方法。
Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 15;4:181. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0151-y.
10
Quality assessment of qualitative evidence for systematic review and synthesis: Is it meaningful, and if so, how should it be performed?系统评价和综合的定性证据质量评估:是否有意义,如果有,应该如何进行?
Res Synth Methods. 2015 Jun;6(2):149-54. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1128. Epub 2014 Oct 2.

将关怀能力转化到远程工作环境中:系统综述方案。

Translating caring competencies to remote working environments: a systematic review protocol.

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Health Sciences Library, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 May 19;11(5):e048459. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048459.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048459
PMID:34011602
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8137205/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Caring professions attend to the health, educational and social needs of society rather than its material needs. Caring professionals are a vital part of the world's response to COVID-19, yet the global pandemic and its aftermath have significantly changed the ways in which care is provided. The rapid pivot to remote care, where the essential caring cues and opportunities are not as readily available, has put unprecedented pressure on caring professions. There is currently a lack of clear understanding and accepted standards for teaching caring profession students how to provide care remotely. The objective of this systematic review is to identify and assess the ways in which educators can integrate online learning opportunities to help students develop effective caring practices and translate these into today's remote and virtual care environments.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This systematic review will consider diverse quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies of innovative online education initiatives and required technology for caring profession education. Articles will be retrieved from academic databases and limited to articles reporting primary data and published in English within the last 10 years. Data extraction procedures will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guideline. The methodological quality of all studies will be assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool and/or the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. Study characteristics will be tabulated and narratively synthesised to integrate and explore relationships within the data.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No ethics approval is required to conduct this review. Review findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and be used to inform and guide caring profession education policy, practice and research agendas with the goal of improving education for caring profession students, and care for the patients, clients and learners they serve.

摘要

简介

关怀职业者关注社会的健康、教育和社会需求,而不是物质需求。关怀专业人员是应对 COVID-19 的世界反应的重要组成部分,但全球大流行及其后果极大地改变了提供关怀的方式。快速转向远程关怀,基本的关怀线索和机会不再那么容易获得,这给关怀职业带来了前所未有的压力。目前,对于如何教导关怀职业学生如何远程提供关怀,缺乏明确的理解和公认的标准。本系统评价的目的是确定和评估教育者如何整合在线学习机会,帮助学生发展有效的关怀实践,并将这些实践转化为当今的远程和虚拟关怀环境。

方法和分析

本系统评价将考虑各种创新的在线教育计划和关怀职业教育所需技术的定量、定性和混合方法研究。文章将从学术数据库中检索,并限于报告主要数据且在过去 10 年内以英文发表的文章。数据提取程序将遵循系统评价和荟萃分析报告指南的首选报告项目。将使用有效公共卫生实践项目质量评估工具和/或乔安娜布里格斯研究所定性研究批判性评估清单评估所有研究的方法学质量。将对研究特征进行制表和叙述性综合,以整合和探索数据中的关系。

伦理和传播

进行此审查不需要伦理批准。审查结果将通过同行评审出版物、会议演讲传播,并用于为关怀职业教育政策、实践和研究议程提供信息和指导,目标是改善关怀职业学生的教育,以及他们所服务的患者、客户和学习者的关怀。