• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妇产科医疗事故索赔:美国与英国的比较

Medical malpractice claims in obstetrics and gynaecology: comparisons between the United States and Britain.

作者信息

Quam L, Dingwall R, Fenn P

机构信息

Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, Wolfson College, Oxford.

出版信息

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988 May;95(5):454-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb12796.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb12796.x
PMID:3401431
Abstract

Obstetricians and gynaecologists have been particularly affected by the increase in the cost and number of medical malpractice claims in Britain. US obstetricians and gynaecologists have experienced a disproportionately higher rate of claim than other practitioners in that country. This article reviews the US experience of obstetrics and gynaecology malpractice claims and questions the validity of showing comparisons between the US and UK. However, even if British malpractice claims do not reach the level of American claims, the effects of claims on the National Health Service, recruitment to obstetrics and gynaecology, and clinical practice are significant.

摘要

在英国,医疗事故索赔的成本和数量不断增加,这对产科医生和妇科医生的影响尤为显著。在美国,产科医生和妇科医生面临索赔的比例高于该国其他从业者。本文回顾了美国产科和妇科医疗事故索赔的情况,并对英美两国进行比较的有效性提出质疑。然而,即使英国的医疗事故索赔未达到美国的水平,索赔对国民医疗服务体系、产科和妇科的人员招聘以及临床实践的影响也是巨大的。

相似文献

1
Medical malpractice claims in obstetrics and gynaecology: comparisons between the United States and Britain.妇产科医疗事故索赔:美国与英国的比较
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988 May;95(5):454-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb12796.x.
2
Trends in malpractice claims for obstetric and gynecologic procedures, 2005 through 2014.2005年至2014年妇产科手术医疗事故索赔趋势。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;217(3):340.e1-340.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.037. Epub 2017 May 23.
3
Overview of professional liability.职业责任概述。
Clin Perinatol. 2007 Jun;34(2):227-32, v. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2007.03.002.
4
Obstetric and gynecologic malpractice claims in Saudi Arabia: Incidence and cause.沙特阿拉伯的妇产科医疗事故索赔:发生率与原因
J Forensic Leg Med. 2016 May;40:8-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Feb 21.
5
Closed liability claims analysis and the medical record.封闭责任索赔分析与病历
Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Aug;80(2):313-6.
6
Professional liability claims and Central Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists members: myth versus reality.医疗职业责任索赔与美国妇产科医师协会成员:神话与现实
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jun;192(6):1820-6; discussion 1826-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.058.
7
Variation in the growth and incidence of medical malpractice claims.医疗事故索赔的增长情况及发生率的变化。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1984 Fall;9(3):475-88. doi: 10.1215/03616878-9-3-475.
8
Medical malpractice litigation: do the British have a better remedy?
Am J Law Med. 1986;11(4):433-63.
9
Medical records figure prominently in malpractice cases. A closed liability claims analysis.医疗记录在医疗事故案件中占据显著地位。一项封闭式责任索赔分析。
Colo Med. 1992 Nov;89(11):398-401.
10
The malpractice premium costs of obstetrics.产科医疗事故保险费用
Inquiry. 1997 Spring;34(1):62-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Medical malpractice in Iran: A systematic review.伊朗的医疗事故:一项系统综述。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019 Oct 14;33:110. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.33.110. eCollection 2019.
2
Obstetric accidents: a review of 64 cases.产科意外:64例病例回顾
BMJ. 1990 May 26;300(6736):1365-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6736.1365.