Suppr超能文献

基兰德产钳与负压吸引器的比较

Kielland's forceps or ventouse--a comparison.

作者信息

Herabutya Y, O-Prasertsawat P, Boonrangsimant P

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988 May;95(5):483-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb12801.x.

Abstract

A retrospective study over a 3-year period compared maternal and neonatal outcomes after birth by Kielland's forceps with those by ventouse when there was deep transverse arrest of head. Of the 259 women, 117 were delivered with Kielland's forceps and 142 were delivered with the ventouse. Of the Kielland's forceps deliveries, 15% were performed by a specialist, compared with 41% of the vacuum extractions. There were no differences in maternal morbidity overall, but when groups of operators were compared maternal complications were more frequent in the forceps group with the less experienced operators. There was little early neonatal morbidity (as judged by Apgar score, intubation, admission to the special care baby unit, jaundice and abnormal neurological behaviour) but cephalhaematoma occurred significantly more often in babies born by the ventouse than by Kielland's forceps. There were no perinatal deaths.

摘要

一项为期3年的回顾性研究,比较了在胎头深横位阻滞时,使用基兰德产钳分娩与使用胎头吸引器分娩后的母婴结局。在259名女性中,117名使用基兰德产钳分娩,142名使用胎头吸引器分娩。在使用基兰德产钳分娩的产妇中,15%由专科医生操作,而使用真空吸引器分娩的这一比例为41%。总体而言,两组产妇的发病率没有差异,但比较不同操作人员分组时,经验较少的操作人员使用产钳分娩的产妇并发症更常见。早期新生儿发病率较低(根据阿氏评分、插管、入住特殊护理婴儿病房、黄疸和异常神经行为判断),但使用胎头吸引器分娩的婴儿发生头皮血肿的几率明显高于使用基兰德产钳分娩的婴儿。没有围产期死亡病例。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验