Suppr超能文献

基兰德产钳仍在持续使用吗?

A continuing use for Kielland's forceps?

作者信息

Traub A I, Morrow R J, Ritchie J W, Dornan K J

出版信息

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984 Sep;91(9):894-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1984.tb03704.x.

Abstract

A retrospective study over a 5-year period compared neonatal outcomes after birth by Kielland's forceps with those after caesarean section in the second stage of labour. The 253 babies born by these two modes of delivery showed no difference in Apgar score, the need for active resuscitation, incidence of jaundice or abnormal neurological behaviour. The neonatal outcome was no worse in the small number of patients where Kielland's forceps delivery was attempted but failed. This study offers support for the continuing role of Kielland's forceps in modern obstetrical practice.

摘要

一项为期5年的回顾性研究比较了使用基兰德产钳分娩后的新生儿结局与第二产程剖宫产术后的新生儿结局。通过这两种分娩方式出生的253名婴儿在阿氏评分、积极复苏的需求、黄疸发生率或神经行为异常方面没有差异。在少数尝试使用基兰德产钳分娩但失败的患者中,新生儿结局也并不更差。这项研究为基兰德产钳在现代产科实践中的持续作用提供了支持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验