Suppr超能文献

基兰德产钳:与新生儿发病率和死亡率的关联。

Kielland's forceps: association with neonatal morbidity and mortality.

作者信息

Chiswick M L, James D K

出版信息

Br Med J. 1979 Jan 6;1(6155):7-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6155.7.

Abstract

The incidence of certain neonatal complications associated with the use of Kielland's forceps was analyzed retrospectively in liveborn singleton babies delivered at this hospital between January and December 1976. The neonatal mortality rate attributable to use of the forceps was 34.9 per 1000. The incidences of delayed onset of respiration (17.4%), birth trauma (15.1%), and abnormal neurological behaviour--namely, apathy or irritability or both--(23.3%) significantly exceeded those in a matched group of babies born spontaneously. Fetal asphyxia played a major part in the aetiology of neonatal complications. Babies on whom Kielland's forceps were used, however, had a significantly greater incidence of abnormal neurological behaviour even in the absence of fetal asphyxia (14.3%), and in all of these babies the abnormal behaviour was transient and did not necessitate admission to the special-care baby unit. Neither maternal height nor the infant's birth weight or occipitofrontal head circumference influenced the occurrence of neonatal complications. The results also suggest that neither the speed of cervical dilatation nor the timing of engagement of the fetal head is of help in predicting the occurrence of neonatal complications after the use of Kielland's forceps.

摘要

回顾性分析了1976年1月至12月在本院出生的单胎活产儿中,与使用基兰德产钳相关的某些新生儿并发症的发生率。因使用产钳导致的新生儿死亡率为每1000例中有34.9例。呼吸延迟发作(17.4%)、产伤(15.1%)以及异常神经行为(即冷漠或易怒或两者皆有)(23.3%)的发生率显著高于匹配的自然分娩婴儿组。胎儿窒息在新生儿并发症的病因中起主要作用。然而,即使在没有胎儿窒息的情况下,使用基兰德产钳的婴儿出现异常神经行为的发生率也显著更高(14.3%),并且所有这些婴儿的异常行为都是短暂的,无需入住特殊护理婴儿病房。母亲身高、婴儿出生体重或枕额头围均不影响新生儿并发症的发生。结果还表明,宫颈扩张速度和胎头入盆时间对预测使用基兰德产钳后新生儿并发症的发生均无帮助。

相似文献

2
Should we abandon Kielland's forceps?我们应该摒弃基兰德产钳吗?
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Jul 30;287(6388):315-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6388.315.
3
Kielland's forceps or ventouse--a comparison.基兰德产钳与负压吸引器的比较
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988 May;95(5):483-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb12801.x.
8
A continuing use for Kielland's forceps?基兰德产钳仍在持续使用吗?
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984 Sep;91(9):894-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1984.tb03704.x.
10
Kielland's forceps. From controversy to consensus?基兰德产钳。从争议到共识?
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 Jan;94(1):8-12. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12511. Epub 2014 Oct 20.

本文引用的文献

1
PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF NEUROLOGICAL SIGNS IN THE NEWBORN.新生儿神经系统体征的预后价值
Proc R Soc Med. 1965 Jan;58(1):3-4. doi: 10.1177/003591576505800102.
3
Trial and failed forceps.试用产钳但失败了。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1962 Jun 1;83:1491-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)35995-6.
4
Spinal cord damage in a newborn infant.新生儿脊髓损伤。
Arch Dis Child. 1974 Jan;49(1):70-1. doi: 10.1136/adc.49.1.70.
5
Spinal cord injury of the fetus during delivery with Kielland's forceps.分娩时使用基兰德产钳导致胎儿脊髓损伤。
J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1974 Feb;81(2):168-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1974.tb00439.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验