Suppr超能文献

拼写错误的普遍性会影响各种语言的阅读行为。

Prevalence of spelling errors affects reading behavior across languages.

机构信息

Department of Linguistics and Languages.

Department of Communication Disorders.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Oct;150(10):1974-1993. doi: 10.1037/xge0001038. Epub 2021 May 20.

Abstract

This cross-linguistic study investigated the impact of spelling errors on reading behavior in five languages (Chinese, English, Finnish, Greek, and Hebrew). Learning theories predict that correct and incorrect spelling alternatives (e.g., "tomorrow" and "tommorrow") provide competing cues to the sound and meaning of a word: The closer the alternatives are to each other in their frequency of occurrence, the more uncertain the reader is regarding the spelling of that word. An information-theoretic measure of entropy was used as an index of uncertainty. Based on theories of learning, we predicted that higher entropy would lead to slower recognition of words even when they are spelled correctly. This prediction was confirmed in eye-tracking sentence-reading experiments in five languages widely variable in their writing systems' phonology and morphology. Moreover, in each language, we observed a characteristic Entropy × Frequency interaction; arguably, its functional shape varied as a function of the orthographic transparency of a given written language. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

这项跨语言研究调查了拼写错误对五种语言(中文、英文、芬兰文、希腊文和希伯来文)阅读行为的影响。学习理论预测,正确和错误的拼写替代词(例如,“tomorrow”和“tommorrow”)会为单词的发音和含义提供相互竞争的线索:替代词在出现频率上越接近,读者对该单词的拼写就越不确定。信息论中的熵度量被用作不确定性的指标。基于学习理论,我们预测,即使单词拼写正确,较高的熵也会导致单词识别速度变慢。这一预测在五种语言的眼动句子阅读实验中得到了证实,这些语言的书写系统在音韵和形态上差异很大。此外,在每种语言中,我们都观察到了一个特征性的熵×频率相互作用;可以说,它的功能形状随着给定书面语言的正字法透明度的变化而变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验