Suppr超能文献

阅读过程中眼球运动控制的空间参数的跨语言研究。

A cross-linguistic study of spatial parameters of eye-movement control during reading.

机构信息

Department of Linguistics and Languages.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022 Nov;48(11):1213-1228. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001038. Epub 2022 Sep 1.

Abstract

Current theories of oculomotor control in reading differ in their accounts of saccadic targeting. Some argue that targets for saccades are solely selected on the basis of the rapidly changing sensory input, whereas others additionally allow for the reader's experiential biases to modulate saccade lengths. We investigated this debate using cross-linguistic data on text reading in 12 alphabetic languages from the Multilingual Eye-Movement Corpus (MECO) database. These languages vary widely in their word length distributions, suggesting that expected word lengths and corresponding biases toward optimal saccade lengths may also vary across readers of these languages. Regression analyses confirmed that readers of languages with longer words (e.g., Finnish) rather than shorter words (e.g., Hebrew) landed further into the word, even when sensory aspects relevant for saccade planning (e.g., word lengths) were controlled for. In the prevalent saccade type, a one-letter difference in mean word length between languages came with one-quarter-letter of a difference in initial landing position and saccade length, and a decrease in 1.5% in refixation probability. Interpreted in the Bayesian framework, the findings highlight the relevance of global language-wide settings for accounts of spatial oculomotor control and lead to testable predictions for further cross-linguistic research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

当前阅读中的眼球运动控制理论在扫视目标的解释上存在分歧。一些人认为扫视的目标完全是基于快速变化的感觉输入来选择的,而另一些人则认为读者的经验偏见也可以调节扫视的长度。我们使用来自多语言眼动语料库(MECO)数据库的 12 种拼音文字的跨语言文本阅读数据来研究这一争议。这些语言在单词长度分布上差异很大,这表明预期的单词长度以及相应的最佳扫视长度偏差可能因这些语言的读者而异。回归分析证实,与阅读短单词(如希伯来语)的读者相比,阅读长单词(如芬兰语)的读者会将眼睛落在单词内更远的地方,即使控制了与扫视计划相关的感觉方面(如单词长度)也是如此。在常见的扫视类型中,语言之间平均单词长度相差一个字母,初始着陆位置和扫视长度相差四分之一字母,再注视概率下降 1.5%。从贝叶斯框架来解释,这些发现强调了全球语言范围设置对空间眼球运动控制解释的重要性,并为进一步的跨语言研究提供了可检验的预测。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
7
Effects of word predictability on eye movements during Arabic reading.阿拉伯语阅读中词频对眼球运动的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Jan;84(1):10-24. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02375-1. Epub 2021 Oct 10.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验