• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Visual working memory items drift apart due to active, not passive, maintenance.视觉工作记忆项目因主动而不是被动的维护而分散。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Dec;150(12):2506-2524. doi: 10.1037/xge0000890. Epub 2021 May 20.
2
An adaptive perspective on visual working memory distortions.视觉工作记忆扭曲的自适应视角。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Oct;151(10):2300-2323. doi: 10.1037/xge0001191. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
3
Are irrelevant items actively deleted from visual working memory?: No evidence from repulsion and attraction effects in dual-retrocue tasks.无关项目是否会主动从视觉工作记忆中删除?来自双重回溯任务中排斥和吸引效应的证据。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Jul;85(5):1499-1516. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02724-2. Epub 2023 May 24.
4
Guidance of attention by working memory is a matter of representational fidelity.工作记忆引导注意力是一个代表性忠实度的问题。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022 Mar;48(3):202-231. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000985. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
5
Rapid forgetting results from competition over time between items in visual working memory.快速遗忘源于视觉工作记忆中各项目随时间的竞争。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Apr;43(4):528-536. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000328. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
6
Memory Fidelity Reveals Qualitative Changes in Interactions Between Items in Visual Working Memory.记忆保真度揭示了视觉工作记忆中项目间相互作用的定性变化。
Psychol Sci. 2021 Sep;32(9):1426-1441. doi: 10.1177/0956797621997367. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
7
Breaking the cardinal rule: The impact of interitem interaction and attentional priority on the cardinal biases in orientation working memory.打破基本规则:项目间交互作用和注意优先级对定向工作记忆中基本偏差的影响
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Oct;84(7):2186-2194. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02374-2. Epub 2021 Oct 17.
8
Efficient Coding in Visual Working Memory Accounts for Stimulus-Specific Variations in Recall.视觉工作记忆中的高效编码解释了回忆中刺激特异性的变化。
J Neurosci. 2018 Aug 8;38(32):7132-7142. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1018-18.2018. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
9
Comparing visual memories to similar visual inputs risks lasting memory distortion.将视觉记忆与相似的视觉输入进行比较会有导致持久的记忆扭曲的风险。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Aug;152(8):2318-2330. doi: 10.1037/xge0001400. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
10
Prioritization sharpens working memories but does not protect them from distraction.优先化会增强工作记忆,但不能防止工作记忆受到干扰。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Apr;152(4):1158-1174. doi: 10.1037/xge0001309. Epub 2022 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Continuous goal representations: Distance in representational space affects goal switching.连续目标表征:表征空间中的距离会影响目标切换。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Jan 21. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01675-9.
2
Robust working memory in a two-dimensional continuous attractor network.二维连续吸引子网络中的稳健工作记忆
Cogn Neurodyn. 2024 Dec;18(6):3273-3289. doi: 10.1007/s11571-023-09979-3. Epub 2023 May 29.
3
Action similarity warps visual feature space in working memory.动作相似性扭曲了工作记忆中的视觉特征空间。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Dec 3;121(49):e2413433121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2413433121. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
4
Going through the motions: Biasing of dynamic attentional templates.走过场:动态注意力模板的偏差
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Nov 7. doi: 10.1037/xge0001665.
5
The perceptual and mnemonic effects of ensemble representation on individual size representation.集合表征对个体大小表征的感知和记忆效应。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Nov;86(8):2740-2760. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02963-x. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
6
Mixing and mingling in visual working memory: Inter-item competition is feature-specific during encoding and feature-general during maintenance.在视觉工作记忆中混合和交融:在编码期间,项目间竞争是特征特异性的,而在维持期间是特征普遍性的。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Aug;86(6):1846-1860. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02933-3. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
7
Memory reports are biased by all relevant contents of working memory.记忆报告受到工作记忆中所有相关内容的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 30;14(1):2507. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51595-6.
8
There Is no Theory-Free Measure of "Swaps" in Visual Working Memory Experiments.在视觉工作记忆实验中,不存在对“交换”的无理论测量方法。
Comput Brain Behav. 2023 Jun;6(2):159-171. doi: 10.1007/s42113-022-00150-5. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
9
Probabilistic visual attentional guidance triggers "feature avoidance" response errors.概率视觉注意引导会引发“特征回避”反应错误。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2023 Jun;49(6):802-820. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001095. Epub 2023 May 4.
10
Feature-based attention warps the perception of visual features.基于特征的注意力扭曲了视觉特征的感知。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 20;13(1):6487. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33488-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Statistical learning as a reference point for memory distortions: Swap and shift errors.统计学习作为记忆扭曲的参考点:交换和移位错误。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 May;83(4):1652-1672. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02236-3. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
2
Humans incorporate trial-to-trial working memory uncertainty into rewarded decisions.人类将试次间工作记忆不确定性纳入到奖励决策中。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Apr 14;117(15):8391-8397. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1918143117. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
3
Visual objects interact differently during encoding and memory maintenance.视觉对象在编码和记忆维持过程中的交互方式不同。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jun;82(3):1241-1257. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01861-x.
4
Attentional capture alters feature perception.注意捕获改变了特征感知。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Nov;45(11):1443-1454. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000681. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
5
Item-specific delay activity demonstrates concurrent storage of multiple active neural representations in working memory.特定项目的延迟活动表明,在工作记忆中可以同时存储多个活跃的神经表示。
PLoS Biol. 2019 Apr 26;17(4):e3000239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000239. eCollection 2019 Apr.
6
Object-Feature Binding Survives Dynamic Shifts of Spatial Attention.客体-特征绑定能在空间注意的动态转移中存活。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Mar;30(3):343-361. doi: 10.1177/0956797618818481. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
7
Strategic allocation of working memory resource.工作记忆资源的策略性分配。
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 1;8(1):16162. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34282-1.
8
Interactions between visual working memory representations.视觉工作记忆表征之间的相互作用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Nov;79(8):2376-2395. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1404-8.
9
The Biology of Forgetting-A Perspective.遗忘的生物学——一种视角
Neuron. 2017 Aug 2;95(3):490-503. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.05.039.
10
Hierarchical Bayesian measurement models for continuous reproduction of visual features from working memory.用于从工作记忆中持续再现视觉特征的分层贝叶斯测量模型。
J Vis. 2017 May 1;17(5):11. doi: 10.1167/17.5.11.

视觉工作记忆项目因主动而不是被动的维护而分散。

Visual working memory items drift apart due to active, not passive, maintenance.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Dec;150(12):2506-2524. doi: 10.1037/xge0000890. Epub 2021 May 20.

DOI:10.1037/xge0000890
PMID:34014755
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8605042/
Abstract

How are humans capable of maintaining detailed representations of visual items in memory? When required to make fine discriminations, we sometimes implicitly differentiate memory representations away from each other to reduce interitem confusion. However, this separation of representations can inadvertently lead memories to be recalled as biased away from other memory items, a phenomenon termed repulsion bias. Using a nonretinotopically specific working memory paradigm, we found stronger repulsion bias with longer working memory delays, but only when items were actively maintained. These results suggest that (a) repulsion bias can reflect a mnemonic phenomenon, distinct from perceptually driven observations of repulsion bias; and (b) mnemonic repulsion bias is ongoing during maintenance and dependent on attention to internally maintained memory items. These results support theories of working memory where items are represented interdependently and further reveals contexts where stronger attention to working memory items during maintenance increases repulsion bias between them. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

人类如何能够在记忆中保持视觉项目的详细表示?当需要进行精细区分时,我们有时会在潜意识中将记忆表示彼此区分开来,以减少项目间的混淆。然而,这种表示的分离可能会无意中导致记忆被召回时偏向于其他记忆项目,这种现象称为排斥偏差。使用非视网膜特定的工作记忆范式,我们发现随着工作记忆延迟时间的增加,排斥偏差会更强,但只有在项目被主动保持时才会出现这种情况。这些结果表明:(a) 排斥偏差可以反映一种记忆现象,与排斥偏差的感知驱动观察不同;(b) 记忆排斥偏差在维持过程中持续存在,并依赖于对内部维持的记忆项目的关注。这些结果支持了工作记忆的理论,即项目是相互依存表示的,进一步揭示了在维持过程中对工作记忆项目的注意力增强会增加它们之间的排斥偏差的情况。(《心理科学信息数据库》记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。