• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注意捕获改变了特征感知。

Attentional capture alters feature perception.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Nov;45(11):1443-1454. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000681. Epub 2019 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1037/xhp0000681
PMID:31464467
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6996971/
Abstract

We live in a dynamic, distracting world. When distracting information captures attention, what are the consequences for perception? Previous literature has focused on effects such as reaction time (RT) slowing, accuracy decrements, and oculomotor capture by distractors. In the current study, we asked whether attentional capture by distractors can also more fundamentally alter target feature representations, and if so, whether participants are aware of such errors. Using a continuous report task and novel confidence range report paradigm, we discovered 2 types of feature-binding errors when a distractor was presented along with the target: First, when attention is strongly captured by the distractor, participants commit swapping errors (misreporting the color at the distractor location instead of the target color), which remarkably seem to occur without awareness. Second, when participants successfully resist capture, they tend to exhibit repulsion (perceptual distortion away from the color at the distractor location). Thus, we found that capture not only induces a spatial shift of attention, it also alters feature perception in striking ways. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

我们生活在一个充满动态和干扰的世界中。当干扰信息吸引注意力时,对感知会产生什么影响?先前的文献主要关注反应时间(RT)减慢、准确性下降以及被干扰物吸引的眼动捕获等效应。在当前的研究中,我们想知道干扰物的注意力捕获是否也可以更根本地改变目标特征表示,如果是这样,参与者是否意识到这些错误。我们使用连续报告任务和新颖的置信范围报告范式,当目标旁边出现干扰物时,我们发现了 2 种特征绑定错误:首先,当注意力被干扰物强烈捕获时,参与者会犯交换错误(错误报告干扰物位置的颜色而不是目标颜色),这些错误显然是在无意识的情况下发生的。其次,当参与者成功抵抗捕获时,他们往往会表现出排斥(远离干扰物位置的颜色的感知扭曲)。因此,我们发现,捕获不仅会引起注意力的空间转移,还会以惊人的方式改变特征感知。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Attentional capture alters feature perception.注意捕获改变了特征感知。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Nov;45(11):1443-1454. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000681. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
2
Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.干扰项基于特征的统计规律调节注意捕获。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Mar;45(3):419-433. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000613.
3
Distractor intrusions are the result of delayed attentional engagement: A new temporal variability account of attentional selectivity in dynamic visual tasks.干扰项侵入是注意力延迟参与的结果:动态视觉任务中注意力选择性的一种新的时间变异性解释。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Jan;150(1):23-41. doi: 10.1037/xge0000789. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
4
How feature relationships influence attention and awareness: Evidence from eye movements and EEG.特征关系如何影响注意力和意识:来自眼动和脑电图的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Dec;44(12):1865-1883. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000574. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
5
Statistical regularities induce spatial as well as feature-specific suppression.统计规律会引起空间和特征特异性的抑制。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Oct;45(10):1291-1303. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000660. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
6
Overt attentional capture by reward-related stimuli overcomes inhibitory suppression.奖励相关刺激引起的过度注意捕获克服了抑制性抑制。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 May;46(5):489-501. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000728. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
7
Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach.顶内沟和颞顶联合区在由干扰物特征引起的注意捕获中的不同作用:一种个体差异研究方法。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Jul;74:50-62. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.029. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
8
Capture by Context Elements, Not Attentional Suppression of Distractors, Explains the P with Small Search Displays.上下文元素捕获而非注意抑制干扰物,解释了小搜索显示中的 P。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Jun;32(6):1170-1183. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01535. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
9
The attentional template is shifted and asymmetrically sharpened by distractor context.注意力模板会因干扰物背景而发生偏移并被不对称地锐化。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Mar;45(3):336-353. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000609. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
10
Memory-driven capture during focused visual attention.记忆驱动的聚焦视觉注意捕获。
Psychol Res. 2024 Jun;88(4):1389-1398. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-01933-0. Epub 2024 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Signal suppression 2.0: An updated account of attentional capture and suppression.信号抑制2.0:注意捕获与抑制的最新阐述
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jul 29. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02736-z.
2
Allocation of spatial attention in human visual cortex as a function of endogenous cue validity.人类视觉皮层中空间注意力的分配作为内源性线索有效性的函数。
Cortex. 2025 Apr;185:4-19. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2025.01.002. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
3
Going through the motions: Biasing of dynamic attentional templates.走过场:动态注意力模板的偏差

本文引用的文献

1
Humans incorporate trial-to-trial working memory uncertainty into rewarded decisions.人类将试次间工作记忆不确定性纳入到奖励决策中。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Apr 14;117(15):8391-8397. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1918143117. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
2
Object-Feature Binding Survives Dynamic Shifts of Spatial Attention.客体-特征绑定能在空间注意的动态转移中存活。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Mar;30(3):343-361. doi: 10.1177/0956797618818481. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
3
Distinguishing among potential mechanisms of singleton suppression.区分单胎抑制的潜在机制。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Nov 7. doi: 10.1037/xge0001665.
4
The influence of emotional feedback material type on attentional capture at different presentation times.不同呈现时间下情绪反馈材料类型对注意捕获的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 16;19(9):e0310022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310022. eCollection 2024.
5
Repulsion bias is insensitive to spatial attention, yet expands during active working memory maintenance.排斥偏见对空间注意力不敏感,但在主动工作记忆维持期间会扩大。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jul;86(5):1653-1667. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02910-w. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
6
Suppression of a salient distractor protects the processing of target features.抑制显著的干扰物可保护目标特征的加工。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Feb;31(1):223-233. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02339-6. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
7
There Is no Theory-Free Measure of "Swaps" in Visual Working Memory Experiments.在视觉工作记忆实验中,不存在对“交换”的无理论测量方法。
Comput Brain Behav. 2023 Jun;6(2):159-171. doi: 10.1007/s42113-022-00150-5. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
8
Dynamic neural reconstructions of attended object location and features using EEG.使用 EEG 进行注意物体位置和特征的动态神经重建。
J Neurophysiol. 2023 Jul 1;130(1):139-154. doi: 10.1152/jn.00180.2022. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
9
Probabilistic visual attentional guidance triggers "feature avoidance" response errors.概率视觉注意引导会引发“特征回避”反应错误。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2023 Jun;49(6):802-820. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001095. Epub 2023 May 4.
10
Feature-based attention warps the perception of visual features.基于特征的注意力扭曲了视觉特征的感知。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 20;13(1):6487. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33488-2.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Apr;44(4):626-644. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000484. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
4
Interactions between visual working memory representations.视觉工作记忆表征之间的相互作用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Nov;79(8):2376-2395. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1404-8.
5
Accounting for stimulus-specific variation in precision reveals a discrete capacity limit in visual working memory.考虑到精度方面特定于刺激的变化,揭示了视觉工作记忆中的离散容量限制。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Jan;43(1):6-17. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000302.
6
Direct Evidence for Active Suppression of Salient-but-Irrelevant Sensory Inputs.主动抑制显著但无关的感觉输入的直接证据。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Nov;26(11):1740-50. doi: 10.1177/0956797615597913. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
7
A Bayesian observer model constrained by efficient coding can explain 'anti-Bayesian' percepts.贝叶斯观察者模型受有效编码约束,可以解释“反贝叶斯”知觉。
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Oct;18(10):1509-17. doi: 10.1038/nn.4105. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
8
Divided spatial attention and feature-mixing errors.空间注意力分散与特征混合错误。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Nov;77(8):2562-9. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0951-0.
9
The role of conscious perception in attentional capture and object-file updating.意识知觉在注意捕获和对象文件更新中的作用。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Jan;26(1):48-57. doi: 10.1177/0956797614556777. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
10
Feature-binding errors after eye movements and shifts of attention.眼球运动和注意力转移后的特征绑定错误。
Psychol Sci. 2014 May 1;25(5):1067-78. doi: 10.1177/0956797614522068. Epub 2014 Mar 19.