Suppr超能文献

急性慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重期使用左氧氟沙星进行为期2天与C反应蛋白指导的抗菌治疗:一项随机对照试验。

2-Day versus C-reactive protein guided antibiotherapy with levofloxacin in acute COPD exacerbation: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Mohamed Amine Msolli, Selma Messous, Adel Sekma, Khaoula Bel Haj Ali, Mohamed Hassene Khalil, Imen Trabelsi, Ahmed Abdelghani, Nadia Ben Brahim, Yosra Ben Dhaya, Rabie Razgallah, Mohamed Habib Grissa, Kaouthar Beltaief, Mehdi Methamem, Asma Belguith, Wahid Bouida, Riadh Boukef, Hamdi Boubaker, Semir Nouira

机构信息

Emergency Department, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia.

Research Laboratory LR12SP18, Monastir University, Monastir, Tunisia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 May 20;16(5):e0251716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251716. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Duration of antibiotic treatment in acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) is most commonly based on expert opinion. Biomarker guided strategy is increasingly recommended to limit unnecessary antibiotic use. We performed a randomized controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of 2-day versus C-reactive protein (CRP)-guided treatment with levofloxacin in patients with AECOPD.

METHODS

Patients with AECOPD were randomized to receive oral levofloxacin daily for 7 days unless the serum CRP level decreased by at least 50% from the baseline value or levofloxacin for two days; thereafter, oral placebo tablet was prescribed according to the CRP. The primary outcome measure was cure rate, and secondary outcome included need for additional antibiotics, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, exacerbation rates and exacerbation free interval (EFI) within one-year follow-up.

RESULTS

In intention to treat (ITT) analysis, cure rate was 76.1% (n = 118) and 79.3% (n = 123) respectively in 2-day and CRP-guided groups. In per protocol (PP) analysis, cure rate was 73% (n = 92) and 70.4% (n = 88) respectively in 2-day and CRP-guided groups. The difference between the two groups was not significant. The need for additional antibiotics and ICU admission rates were not significantly different between the two groups. One-year exacerbation rate was 27% (n = 42) in 2-day group versus 30.3% (n = 47) in CRP-guided group (p = 0.53); the EFI was 125 days (interquartile range, 100-151) versus 100 days (interquartile range, 78-123) in 2-day and CRP-guided groups respectively (p = 0.45). No difference in adverse effects was detected.

CONCLUSION

Levofloxacin once daily for 2 days had similar efficacy compared to CRP-guided in AECOPD. This short course treatment decreased antibiotic consumption which would improve patient compliance and reduce adverse effects.

摘要

引言

慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期(AECOPD)的抗生素治疗时长通常基于专家意见。越来越多的人推荐采用生物标志物指导策略以限制不必要的抗生素使用。我们开展了一项随机对照研究,以评估在AECOPD患者中,2天疗程的左氧氟沙星治疗与C反应蛋白(CRP)指导下的左氧氟沙星治疗的疗效。

方法

AECOPD患者被随机分组,除非血清CRP水平较基线值降低至少50%,否则一组患者每日口服左氧氟沙星7天,另一组患者口服左氧氟沙星2天;此后,根据CRP情况给予口服安慰剂片。主要结局指标为治愈率,次要结局包括是否需要额外使用抗生素、入住重症监护病房(ICU)、加重率以及1年随访期内的无加重间期(EFI)。

结果

在意向性分析(ITT)中,2天疗程组和CRP指导组的治愈率分别为76.1%(n = 118)和79.3%(n = 123)。在符合方案分析(PP)中,2天疗程组和CRP指导组的治愈率分别为73%(n = 92)和70.4%(n = 88)。两组之间的差异不显著。两组之间额外使用抗生素的需求和入住ICU的比率没有显著差异。2天疗程组的1年加重率为27%(n = 42),而CRP指导组为30.3%(n = 47)(p = 0.53);2天疗程组和CRP指导组的EFI分别为125天(四分位间距,100 - 151)和100天(四分位间距,78 - 123)(p = 0.45)。未检测到不良反应存在差异。

结论

在AECOPD中,每日1次、为期2天的左氧氟沙星治疗与CRP指导下的治疗疗效相似。这种短疗程治疗减少了抗生素的使用量,这将提高患者的依从性并减少不良反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cd4/8136675/9015f5a261a6/pone.0251716.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验