Department of Biology, Lund University, 22362, Lund, Sweden.
Department of Medical Education, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
Microbiome. 2021 May 20;9(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01076-z.
Recent advances in metagenomic technology and computational prediction may inadvertently weaken an individual's reasonable expectation of privacy. Through cross-kingdom genetic and metagenomic forensics, we can already predict at least a dozen human phenotypes with varying degrees of accuracy. There is also growing potential to detect a "molecular echo" of an individual's microbiome from cells deposited on public surfaces. At present, host genetic data from somatic or germ cells provide more reliable information than microbiome samples. However, the emerging ability to infer personal details from different microscopic biological materials left behind on surfaces requires in-depth ethical and legal scrutiny. There is potential to identify and track individuals, along with new, surreptitious means of genetic discrimination. This commentary underscores the need to update legal and policy frameworks for genetic privacy with additional considerations for the information that could be acquired from microbiome-derived data. The article also aims to stimulate ubiquitous discourse to ensure the protection of genetic rights and liberties in the post-genomic era. Video abstract.
元基因组技术和计算预测的最新进展可能会无意中削弱个人对隐私的合理期望。通过跨王国遗传和元基因组取证,我们已经可以在不同程度上预测至少十几种人类表型。还有越来越大的潜力可以从细胞在公共表面上的沉积中检测到个人微生物组的“分子回声”。目前,来自体细胞或生殖细胞的宿主遗传数据比微生物组样本提供了更可靠的信息。但是,从表面上遗留的不同微观生物材料推断个人细节的新兴能力需要深入的伦理和法律审查。有可能识别和跟踪个人,以及新的、秘密的遗传歧视手段。本评论强调了需要更新遗传隐私的法律和政策框架,并对从微生物组衍生数据中获取的信息进行额外考虑。这篇文章还旨在激发普遍的讨论,以确保在后基因组时代保护遗传权利和自由。视频摘要。