• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初次全髋关节置换术的手术入路与假体周围股骨骨折的时间、发生率及特征有关吗?

Is Surgical Approach for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Associated With Timing, Incidence, and Characteristics of Periprosthetic Femur Fractures?

作者信息

Lygrisse Katherine A, Gaukhman Gaukhman D, Teo Greg, Schwarzkopf Ran, Long William J, Aggarwal Vinay K

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2021 Sep;36(9):3305-3311. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.04.026. Epub 2021 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2021.04.026
PMID:34016522
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic femur fractures (PFF) involving primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) remain a significant concern. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of surgical approach during primary THA on early PFF with respect to fracture timing, incidence, radiographic parameters, and surgery-related factors.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients with PFF during or after primary THA from 2011 to 2019 was conducted at a single, urban academic institution. Of the study cohort of 11,915 patients, 79 patients with PFF were identified (0.66%). Direct anterior (DA), posterior anterior (PA), and laterally based (LA) cohorts were formed based on the surgical approach. PA and LA groups were combined to form a nonanterior (NA) cohort. Radiographic parameters, surgical factors, and fracture mechanism were analyzed.

RESULTS

The incidence of fracture across approaches was 0.70% (33/4707; DA), 0.63% (35/5600; PA), and 0.68% (11/1608; LA) (P = .97). Time from THA to fracture was significantly shorter in the DA cohort (12.5 ± 14.1 days) than the NA cohort (48.2 ± 120.6 days) (P = .05). Postoperatively identified, atraumatic PFFs were more common in the DA cohort (78.3%, 18/23) than the NA cohort (51.6%, 16/31) (P = .045). There were no differences between groups in radiographic or other clinical parameters.

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent DA THA have significantly shorter time to PFF and were more often identified postoperatively with an atraumatic mechanism than patients who underwent NA approaches. The known difficulty in femoral exposure and stem placement with the DA approach may play a role in contributing to a higher rate of intraoperative or early postoperative PFF.

摘要

背景

涉及初次全髋关节置换术(THA)的人工关节周围股骨骨折(PFF)仍然是一个重大问题。本研究的目的是评估初次THA手术入路对早期PFF在骨折时间、发生率、影像学参数和手术相关因素方面的影响。

方法

在一家城市学术机构对2011年至2019年期间初次THA术中或术后所有PFF患者进行回顾性研究。在11915例研究队列患者中,确定了79例PFF患者(0.66%)。根据手术入路形成直接前路(DA)、后外侧入路(PA)和外侧入路(LA)队列。将PA组和LA组合并形成非前路(NA)队列。分析影像学参数、手术因素和骨折机制。

结果

各入路的骨折发生率分别为0.70%(33/4707;DA)、0.63%(35/5600;PA)和0.68%(11/1608;LA)(P = .97)。DA队列中从THA到骨折的时间(12.5±14.1天)明显短于NA队列(48.2±120.6天)(P = .05)。术后发现,无创伤性PFF在DA队列中(78.3%,18/23)比NA队列中(51.6%,16/31)更常见(P = .045)。各组在影像学或其他临床参数方面无差异。

结论

与接受NA入路的患者相比,接受DA THA的患者发生PFF的时间明显更短,且术后更常被确定为无创伤机制。DA入路在股骨暴露和假体柄置入方面已知的困难可能在导致术中或术后早期PFF发生率较高方面起作用。

相似文献

1
Is Surgical Approach for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Associated With Timing, Incidence, and Characteristics of Periprosthetic Femur Fractures?初次全髋关节置换术的手术入路与假体周围股骨骨折的时间、发生率及特征有关吗?
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Sep;36(9):3305-3311. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.04.026. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
2
Periprosthetic Femur Fracture Risk: Influenced by Stem Choice, Not Surgical Approach.人工关节周围股骨骨折风险:受柄选择影响,与手术入路无关。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jul;36(7S):S363-S366. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.012. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
3
Early Periprosthetic Femur Fractures After Primary Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty: High Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Subsequent Reoperation.初次非骨水泥全髋关节置换术后早期股骨假体周围骨折:假体周围关节感染和后续再手术的高风险。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Apr;39(4):1083-1087.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.10.037. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
4
Cumulative Long-Term Incidence of Postoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Using an Uncemented Tapered Titanium Hip Stem: 26- to 32-Year Results.使用非骨水泥锥形钛合金髋关节柄的累积长期术后股骨假体周围骨折发生率:26 至 32 年的结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jan;34(1):77-81. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.038. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
5
Increased risk of periprosthetic femur fractures associated with a unique cementless stem design.与一种独特的非骨水泥型股骨柄设计相关的假体周围股骨骨折风险增加。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):2045-53. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4077-9. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
6
Higher Annual Total Hip Arthroplasty Volume Decreases the Risk of Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femur Fractures.较高的全髋关节置换术年手术量可降低术中股骨假体周围骨折的风险。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Jan;39(1):138-144. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.07.014. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
7
Deep-Learning Automation of Preoperative Radiographic Parameters Associated With Early Periprosthetic Femur Fracture After Total Hip Arthroplasty.深度学习自动化预测全髋关节置换术后早期股骨假体周围骨折的术前影像学参数。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 May;39(5):1191-1198.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.11.021. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
8
Femoral Component Undersizing and Alignment are Risk Factors for Early Periprosthetic Femur Fracture.股骨部件尺寸不足和对线不良是早期假体股骨骨折的危险因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jul;37(7S):S604-S610. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.015. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
9
Hip Arthroplasty Femoral Stem Designs and Their Association With Early Postoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures.髋关节置换股骨柄设计及其与术后早期股骨假体周围骨折的关系。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 May;38(5):849-854. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.12.020. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
10
Incidence, Classification, and Risk Factors for Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Single Stem: A Retrospective Study.髋关节置换术中单柄假体周围股骨骨折的发生率、分类及危险因素:一项回顾性研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7):1400-1411. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.031. Epub 2019 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Timing of adverse events in patients undergoing acute and elective hip arthroplasty surgery: a multicentre cohort study using the Global Trigger Tool.接受急性和择期髋关节置换术患者不良事件的时间:使用全球触发工具的多中心队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 9;13(6):e064794. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064794.