• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

深度学习自动化预测全髋关节置换术后早期股骨假体周围骨折的术前影像学参数。

Deep-Learning Automation of Preoperative Radiographic Parameters Associated With Early Periprosthetic Femur Fracture After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

机构信息

Weill Cornell College of Medicine, New York, New York; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2024 May;39(5):1191-1198.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.11.021. Epub 2023 Nov 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2023.11.021
PMID:38007206
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The radiographic assessment of bone morphology impacts implant selection and fixation type in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and is important to minimize the risk of periprosthetic femur fracture (PFF). We utilized a deep-learning algorithm to automate femoral radiographic parameters and determined which automated parameters were associated with early PFF.

METHODS

Radiographs from a publicly available database and from patients undergoing primary cementless THA at a high-volume institution (2016 to 2020) were obtained. A U-Net algorithm was trained to segment femoral landmarks for bone morphology parameter automation. Automated parameters were compared against that of a fellowship-trained surgeon and compared in an independent cohort of 100 patients who underwent THA (50 with early PFF and 50 controls matched by femoral component, age, sex, body mass index, and surgical approach).

RESULTS

On the independent cohort, the algorithm generated 1,710 unique measurements for 95 images (5% lesser trochanter identification failure) in 22 minutes. Medullary canal width, femoral cortex width, canal flare index, morphological cortical index, canal bone ratio, and canal calcar ratio had good-to-excellent correlation with surgeon measurements (Pearson's correlation coefficient: 0.76 to 0.96). Canal calcar ratios (0.43 ± 0.08 versus 0.40 ± 0.07) and canal bone ratios (0.39 ± 0.06 versus 0.36 ± 0.06) were higher (P < .05) in the PFF cohort when comparing the automated parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Deep-learning automated parameters demonstrated differences in patients who had and did not have early PFF after cementless primary THA. This algorithm has the potential to complement and improve patient-specific PFF risk-prediction tools.

摘要

背景

在全髋关节置换术(THA)中,骨骼形态的放射学评估会影响植入物的选择和固定类型,对于降低假体周围股骨骨折(PFF)的风险非常重要。我们利用深度学习算法实现了股骨放射学参数的自动化,并确定了哪些自动化参数与早期 PFF 相关。

方法

从一个公开数据库和一个高容量机构(2016 年至 2020 年)接受初次非骨水泥 THA 的患者中获取放射照片。使用 U-Net 算法对股骨标志进行分割,实现骨骼形态参数的自动化。将自动化参数与一名经过 fellowship培训的外科医生的参数进行比较,并在 100 名接受 THA 的患者(50 例早期 PFF 和 50 例匹配股骨组件、年龄、性别、体重指数和手术入路的对照)的独立队列中进行比较。

结果

在独立队列中,该算法在 22 分钟内为 95 张图像生成了 1710 个独特的测量值(5%的小转子识别失败)。髓腔宽度、股骨皮质宽度、管腔扩张指数、形态皮质指数、管腔骨比和管腔骺骨比与外科医生的测量值具有良好到极好的相关性(Pearson 相关系数:0.76 至 0.96)。在比较自动化参数时,PFF 组的管腔骺骨比(0.43±0.08 比 0.40±0.07)和管腔骨比(0.39±0.06 比 0.36±0.06)更高(P<0.05)。

结论

在初次非骨水泥 THA 后出现和未出现早期 PFF 的患者中,深度学习自动化参数存在差异。该算法有可能补充和改进针对假体周围股骨骨折的特定患者风险预测工具。

相似文献

1
Deep-Learning Automation of Preoperative Radiographic Parameters Associated With Early Periprosthetic Femur Fracture After Total Hip Arthroplasty.深度学习自动化预测全髋关节置换术后早期股骨假体周围骨折的术前影像学参数。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 May;39(5):1191-1198.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.11.021. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
2
Femoral Component Undersizing and Alignment are Risk Factors for Early Periprosthetic Femur Fracture.股骨部件尺寸不足和对线不良是早期假体股骨骨折的危险因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jul;37(7S):S604-S610. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.015. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
3
Does Femoral Morphology Predict the Risk of Periprosthetic Fracture After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty?股骨形态是否能预测非骨水泥全髋关节置换术后假体周围骨折的风险?
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6S):S359-S363. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.048. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
4
Risk Factors for Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty.非骨水泥全髋关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折的危险因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Oct;39(10):2547-2554. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.06.005. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
5
Increased risk of periprosthetic femur fractures associated with a unique cementless stem design.与一种独特的非骨水泥型股骨柄设计相关的假体周围股骨骨折风险增加。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):2045-53. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4077-9. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
6
Early Periprosthetic Femur Fractures After Primary Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty: High Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Subsequent Reoperation.初次非骨水泥全髋关节置换术后早期股骨假体周围骨折:假体周围关节感染和后续再手术的高风险。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Apr;39(4):1083-1087.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.10.037. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
7
Is Surgical Approach for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Associated With Timing, Incidence, and Characteristics of Periprosthetic Femur Fractures?初次全髋关节置换术的手术入路与假体周围股骨骨折的时间、发生率及特征有关吗?
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Sep;36(9):3305-3311. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.04.026. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
8
Periprosthetic Femur Fracture Risk: Influenced by Stem Choice, Not Surgical Approach.人工关节周围股骨骨折风险:受柄选择影响,与手术入路无关。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jul;36(7S):S363-S366. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.012. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
9
Higher Annual Total Hip Arthroplasty Volume Decreases the Risk of Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femur Fractures.较高的全髋关节置换术年手术量可降低术中股骨假体周围骨折的风险。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Jan;39(1):138-144. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.07.014. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
10
Rectangular Taper Stem Designs Are Associated With a Higher Risk for Periprosthstic Femoral Fractures After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty.矩形锥形柄设计与非骨水泥全髋关节置换术后假体周围股骨骨折的风险增加相关。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Nov;38(11):2379-2385. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.05.052. Epub 2023 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Utility of Radiographic Parameter in Assessing Bone Density and Subsequent Fractures in Patients With Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture.影像学参数在评估骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者骨密度及后续骨折中的应用
Neurospine. 2024 Sep;21(3):966-972. doi: 10.14245/ns.2448310.155. Epub 2024 Sep 30.