Bingham Debra, Hammersla Margaret, Belcher Anne, Ruccio Lucy Rose, Bindon Susan, Buckley Kathleen, Martin Jeff, Idzik Shannon
University of Maryland School of Nursing
Institute for Perinatal Quality Improvement
J Dr Nurs Pract. 2021 May 20. doi: 10.1891/JDNP-D-20-00036.
Quality improvement (QI) projects comprise the majority of University of Maryland School of Nursing (UMSON) Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) projects.
An online survey was completed by 51% ( = 38) of faculty, who teach or mentor DNP students, and was analyzed using quantitative and descriptive methods.
Faculty were somewhat or not familiar with developing a QI charter 68.4%, human error theory and error proofing 63.2%, driver diagrams 60.5%, characteristics of high-reliability organizations 60.5%, and Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) guidelines 55.3%. The faculty were most interested in learning more about ( = 97 responses) were human error theory and error proofing (28.9%), SQUIRE guidelines (26.3%), statistical process control (21.1%), and implementation strategies and tactics (21.1%). The most commonly identified challenges included identifying QI projects (24%), project time constraints (16%), keeping up-to-date on QI concepts, methods, and tools (12%), and balancing professional workload (10%).
Gaps in self-reported QI knowledge indicate there is a need for further development of DNP and PhD prepared faculty at the UMSON.
质量改进(QI)项目占马里兰大学护理学院(UMSON)护理实践博士(DNP)项目的大部分。
对教授或指导DNP学生的51%(n = 38)的教员进行了在线调查,并采用定量和描述性方法进行分析。
教员对制定QI章程(68.4%)、人为错误理论和防错(63.2%)、驱动图(60.5%)、高可靠性组织的特征(60.5%)以及卓越质量改进报告标准(SQUIRE)指南(55.3%)有些熟悉或不熟悉。教员最感兴趣了解更多的方面(n = 97份回复)是人为错误理论和防错(28.9%)、SQUIRE指南(26.3%)、统计过程控制(21.1%)以及实施策略和战术(21.1%)。最常提到的挑战包括确定QI项目(24%)、项目时间限制(16%)、跟上QI概念、方法和工具的最新发展(12%)以及平衡专业工作量(10%)。
自我报告的QI知识差距表明,UMSON需要进一步培养具有DNP和博士学位的教员。